Literature DB >> 24782433

Data validation and other strategies for data entry.

Kevin A Kupzyk1, Marlene Z Cohen2.   

Abstract

Data entry can result in errors that cause analytic problems and delays in disseminating research. Invalid responses can lead to incorrect statistics and statistical conclusions. The purpose of this article is to provide researchers some basic strategies for avoiding out-of-range data entry errors and streamlining data collection. This article identifies some basic strategies using Microsoft® Excel, which is an inexpensive method of data entry that can be used when research budgets are constrained. Data files can be structured so that out-of-range values cannot be entered. When string variables are entered, researchers may be inconsistent in the way they code responses. Data validation can be accomplished through the use of restricting response options and skipping items can be avoided by using count functions to tabulate the number of valid responses. We also discuss advantages and disadvantages of several methods of data entry, including using web-based data entry and relational databases.
© The Author(s) 2014.

Keywords:  data entry; descriptive quantitative; gerontology; instrument development; methods

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24782433     DOI: 10.1177/0193945914532550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  4 in total

1.  Quality of MBSAQIP data: bad luck, or lack of QA plan?

Authors:  K Noyes; A A Myneni; S D Schwaitzberg; A B Hoffman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Medical Registry Data Collection Efficiency: A Crossover Study Comparing Web-Based Electronic Data Capture and a Standard Spreadsheet.

Authors:  Pedro Vinícius Staziaki; Phillip Kim; Harshna V Vadvala; Brian B Ghoshhajra
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 5.428

3.  Data entry quality of double data entry vs automated form processing technologies: A cohort study validation of optical mark recognition and intelligent character recognition in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Aksel Paulsen; Knut Harboe; Ingvild Dalen
Journal:  Health Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-29

4.  Patient awareness/knowledge towards oral cancer: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Neel Shimpi; Monica Jethwani; Aditi Bharatkumar; Po-Huang Chyou; Ingrid Glurich; Amit Acharya
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.757

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.