Literature DB >> 24782341

Comparative distribution and arrangement of Herbst corpuscles in the oropharynx of the ostrich (Struthio camelus) and emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae).

Martina Rachel Crole1, John Thomson Soley.   

Abstract

Herbst corpuscles are widely distributed throughout the oropharynx of the ostrich and emu in contrast to the general situation in birds. Knowledge of the comparative distribution of Herbst corpuscles in the oropharynx of these two commercially important ratite species may assist in a better understanding of their feeding habits. Tissue sections representing all parts of the oropharynx of five ostrich and five emu heads collected after slaughter were prepared for light microscopy, the Herbst corpuscles counted, and the relative percentage of corpuscles calculated for defined anatomical regions. Herbst corpuscles were more widespread in the oropharynx of the emu (where they were additionally found in the tongue and laryngeal mound) than in the ostrich but were absent from the pharyngeal folds in both species. The results further indicated that Herbst corpuscles were strategically located to aid in the handling and transport of food. In this context, the high concentration of Herbst corpuscles in the prominent median palatine and ventral ridges in the ostrich denote these structures as sensory organs, namely the palatal and interramal organs. The presence of these sensory organs, coupled with the higher relative percentage of Herbst corpuscles located on the rostral oropharyngeal floor, indicate that the part of the oropharynx caudal to the mandibular and maxillary rostra forms an important sensory region in the ostrich. Additionally, species-specific concentrations of Herbst corpuscles within the oropharynx were identified which appear to assist in the accurate positioning of the tongue and laryngeal mound for cleaning the choana (internal nares) after swallowing.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dromaius novaehollandiae; Herbst corpuscle distribution; Struthio camelus; oropharynx; sensory organ

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24782341     DOI: 10.1002/ar.22933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)        ISSN: 1932-8486            Impact factor:   2.064


  4 in total

Review 1.  Tactile sensation in birds: Physiological insights from avian mechanoreceptors.

Authors:  Luke H Ziolkowski; Elena O Gracheva; Sviatoslav N Bagriantsev
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 7.070

2.  Comparative Genomics Provides Insights into Adaptive Evolution in Tactile-Foraging Birds.

Authors:  Li Wang; Li Sun; Qiu-Hong Wan; Sheng-Guo Fang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.141

3.  Comparative morphology and soft tissue histology of the remote-touch bill-tip organ in three ibis species of differing foraging ecology.

Authors:  Carla J du Toit; Anusuya Chinsamy; Susan J Cunningham
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.921

4.  Morphofunctional study of the tongue in the domestic duck (Anas platyrhynchos f. domestica, Anatidae): LM and SEM study.

Authors:  Kinga Skieresz-Szewczyk; Hanna Jackowiak
Journal:  Zoomorphology       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 1.326

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.