Literature DB >> 24782335

Fosfomycin for the treatment of resistant gram-negative bacterial infections. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists.

Julia L Reffert1, Winter J Smith.   

Abstract

The antimicrobial agent fosfomycin was discovered in 1969, at a time when bacteria had not yet developed extended-spectrum β-lactamases or carbapenemases. Decades later, it is not uncommon for gram-negative organisms to be multidrug-resistant and even pan-resistant to available antibiotic regimens, leaving clinicians with few therapeutic alternatives. Because fosfomycin has been shown to retain activity against these virulent pathogens, there is renewed interest in its use as a therapeutic agent. Fosfomycin formulations including fosfomycin disodium and the newer tromethamine salt are less toxic than other alternatives and are attractive options for resistant gram-negative and gram-positive infections. Oral fosfomycin tromethamine is approved for urinary tract infections in the United States, and an intravenous formulation is also available outside of the United States for systemic disease. The bactericidal action of fosfomycin occurs at an earlier step in cell wall synthesis than that of β-lactam antibiotics. From an in vitro standpoint, fosfomycin generally has high activity against ESBL- and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae; multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility appears to be more dependent on the local antibiogram. Fosfomycin formulations have a large volume of distribution, penetrate biofilms, and concentrate in the urine. Both oral and intravenous fosfomycin formulations are effective for a wide range of gram-negative infections and disease severities; however, clinical studies are limited. Fosfomycin formulations are well-tolerated, and mild gastrointestinal distress is the most common adverse effect. The primary limitations of fosfomycin are the lack of established regimens for complicated infections and the lack of availability of the intravenous formulation in the United States. Further study of this promising agent seems warranted in the current climate of antibiotic resistance.
© 2014 Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ESBL; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenemase; fosfomycin; infection; resistant

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24782335     DOI: 10.1002/phar.1434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacotherapy        ISSN: 0277-0008            Impact factor:   4.705


  20 in total

1.  Perceptions and behaviours of infectious diseases physicians when managing urinary tract infections due to MDR organisms.

Authors:  Sergio E Trevino; Hilary M Babcock; Jeffrey P Henderson; Michael A Lane; Susan E Beekmann; Philip M Polgreen; Jonas Marschall
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Potential Use of Fosfomycin-Tromethamine for Treatment of Recurrent Campylobacter Species Enteritis.

Authors:  Juan Aguilar-Company; Ibai Los-Arcos; Carles Pigrau; Dolors Rodríguez-Pardo; María Nieves Larrosa; Virginia Rodríguez-Garrido; Denisse Sihuay-Diburga; Benito Almirante
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 3.  Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of critically Ill patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Neuner; Jason C Gallagher
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 5.882

4.  Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Fosfomycin in Combination with Selected Antimicrobial Comparison Agents Tested against Gram-Negative Bacterial Strains by Using Time-Kill Curves.

Authors:  Robert K Flamm; Paul R Rhomberg; Jill M Lindley; Kim Sweeney; E J Ellis-Grosse; Dee Shortridge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Utility of fosfomycin as antibacterial prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Tanya Zapolskaya; Sarah Perreault; Dayna McManus; Jeffrey E Topal
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  In Vitro Pharmacodynamics of Fosfomycin against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacter cloacae and Klebsiella aerogenes.

Authors:  Tze-Peng Lim; Jocelyn Qi-Min Teo; Audrey Wei-Ling Goh; Si-Xuan Tan; Tse-Hsien Koh; Winnie Hui-Ling Lee; Yiying Cai; Thuan-Tong Tan; Andrea Lay-Hoon Kwa
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Pharmacodynamic Attainment of the Synergism of Meropenem and Fosfomycin Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa Producing Metallo-β-Lactamase.

Authors:  James Albiero; Josmar Mazucheli; Juliana Pimenta Dos Reis Barros; Marcia Maria Dos Anjos Szczerepa; Sheila Alexandra Belini Nishiyama; Floristher Elaine Carrara-Marroni; Serubbabel Sy; Matthew Fidler; Sherwin K B Sy; Maria Cristina Bronharo Tognim
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Beyond Susceptible and Resistant, Part III: Treatment of Infections due to Gram-Negative Organisms Producing Carbapenemases.

Authors:  Navaneeth Narayanan; Linda Johnson; Conan MacDougall
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr

9.  Synergistic activity and molecular modelling of fosfomycin combinations with some antibiotics against multidrug resistant Helicobacter pylori.

Authors:  Ahmed Megahed Abouwarda; Tarek Abdelmonem Ismail; Wael Mohamed Abu El-Wafa; Ahmed Hassan Ibrahim Faraag
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.253

10.  Fosfomycin Susceptibility in Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Species and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococci Urinary Isolates.

Authors:  Linda B Ou; Lynn Nadeau
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.