Salvatore Italia1, Silke Britta Wolfenstetter, Christina Maria Teuner. 1. Department of International Health, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands, salvatore.italia@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among children/adolescents is popular. This review summarizes the international findings for prevalence and predictors of CAM use among children/adolescents. We therefore systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED; last update in 07/2013) and reference lists of existing reviews and all included studies. Publications without language restriction reporting patterns of CAM utilization among children/adolescents without chronic conditions were selected for inclusion. The prevalence rates for overall CAM use, homeopathy, and herbal drug use were extracted with a focus on country and recall period (lifetime, 1 year, current use). As predictors, we extracted socioeconomic factors, child's age, and gender. The database search and citation tracking yielded 58 eligible studies from 19 countries. There was strong variation regarding study quality. Prevalence rates for overall CAM use ranged from 10.9-87.6 % for lifetime use and from 8-48.5 % for current use. The respective percentages for homeopathy (highest in Germany, United Kingdom, and Canada) ranged from 0.8-39 % (lifetime) and from 1-14.3 % (current). Herbal drug use (highest in Germany, Turkey, and Brazil) was reported for 0.8-85.5 % (lifetime) and 2.2-8.9 % (current) of the children/adolescents. Studies provided a relatively uniform picture of the predictors of overall CAM use (higher parental income and education, older children), but only a few studies analyzed predictors for single CAM modalities. CONCLUSION: CAM use is widespread among children/adolescents. Prevalence rates vary widely regarding CAM modality, country, and reported recall period.
UNLABELLED: Utilization of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among children/adolescents is popular. This review summarizes the international findings for prevalence and predictors of CAM use among children/adolescents. We therefore systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, AMED; last update in 07/2013) and reference lists of existing reviews and all included studies. Publications without language restriction reporting patterns of CAM utilization among children/adolescents without chronic conditions were selected for inclusion. The prevalence rates for overall CAM use, homeopathy, and herbal drug use were extracted with a focus on country and recall period (lifetime, 1 year, current use). As predictors, we extracted socioeconomic factors, child's age, and gender. The database search and citation tracking yielded 58 eligible studies from 19 countries. There was strong variation regarding study quality. Prevalence rates for overall CAM use ranged from 10.9-87.6 % for lifetime use and from 8-48.5 % for current use. The respective percentages for homeopathy (highest in Germany, United Kingdom, and Canada) ranged from 0.8-39 % (lifetime) and from 1-14.3 % (current). Herbal drug use (highest in Germany, Turkey, and Brazil) was reported for 0.8-85.5 % (lifetime) and 2.2-8.9 % (current) of the children/adolescents. Studies provided a relatively uniform picture of the predictors of overall CAM use (higher parental income and education, older children), but only a few studies analyzed predictors for single CAM modalities. CONCLUSION: CAM use is widespread among children/adolescents. Prevalence rates vary widely regarding CAM modality, country, and reported recall period.
Authors: Felicity L Bishop; Philip Prescott; Yean Koon Chan; Jemma Saville; Erik von Elm; George T Lewith Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-03-22 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Salvatore Italia; Helmut Brand; Joachim Heinrich; Dietrich Berdel; Andrea von Berg; Silke Britta Wolfenstetter Journal: BMC Complement Altern Med Date: 2015-03-10 Impact factor: 3.659
Authors: Mehdi Trifa; Dmitry Tumin; Hina Walia; Kathleen L Lemanek; Joseph D Tobias; Tarun Bhalla Journal: J Pain Res Date: 2018-03-01 Impact factor: 3.133
Authors: Siti Nurkamilla Ramdzan; Hilary Pinnock; Su May Liew; Nursyuhada Sukri; Hani Salim; Nik Sherina Hanafi; Norita Hussein; Julia Suhaimi; Ping Yein Lee; Ai Theng Cheong; Azainorsuzila Mohd Ahad; Steve Cunningham; Ee Ming Khoo Journal: NPJ Prim Care Respir Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.871
Authors: Miek C Jong; Stephen L Buskin; Lydia Ilyenko; Irina Kholodova; Julia Burkart; Stephan Weber; Thomas Keller; Petra Klement Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med Date: 2016-05-16