Literature DB >> 24781947

Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects.

Luke X Chong1, Allison M McKendrick1, Shonraj B Ganeshrao2, Andrew Turpin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To introduce a perimetric algorithm (gradient-oriented automated natural neighbor approach [GOANNA]) that automatically chooses spatial test locations to improve characterization of visual field (VF) loss without increasing test times.
METHODS: Computer simulations were undertaken to assess the performance of GOANNA. GOANNA was run on a 3° grid of 150 locations, and was compared with a zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) thresholding strategy for locations in the 24-2 test pattern, with the remaining 98 locations being interpolated. Simulations were seeded using empirical data from 23 eyes with glaucoma that were measured at all 150 locations. The performance of the procedures was assessed by comparing the output thresholds to the input thresholds (accuracy and precision) and by evaluating the number of presentations required for the procedure to terminate (efficiency).
RESULTS: When collated across whole-fields, there was no significant difference in accuracy, precision, or efficiency between GOANNA and ZEST. However, GOANNA targeted presentations on scotoma borders; hence it was more precise and accurate at locations where the sensitivity gradient within the VF was high.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ZEST, GOANNA was marginally less precise in areas of the VF that had spatially uniform sensitivity, but improved accuracy and precision in regions surrounding scotoma edges. GOANNA provides a principled framework for automatic placement of additional test locations to provide spatially denser testing around the borders of VF loss. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  algorithms; computer simulation; perimetry; visual fields

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24781947     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-13761

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  The Effect of Stimulus Size on the Reliable Stimulus Range of Perimetry.

Authors:  Stuart K Gardiner; Shaban Demirel; Deborah Goren; Steven L Mansberger; William H Swanson
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.283

2.  Functional characteristics of glaucoma related arcuate defects seen on OCT en face visualisation of the retinal nerve fibre layer.

Authors:  Bright S Ashimatey; Brett J King; William H Swanson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  The value of visual field testing in the era of advanced imaging: clinical and psychophysical perspectives.

Authors:  Jack Phu; Sieu K Khuu; Michael Yapp; Nagi Assaad; Michael P Hennessy; Michael Kalloniatis
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Development of a Visual Field Simulation Model of Longitudinal Point-Wise Sensitivity Changes From a Clinical Glaucoma Cohort.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Improving Spatial Resolution and Test Times of Visual Field Testing Using ARREST.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; William H Morgan; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.283

6.  Performance of a Defect-Mapping Microperimetry Approach for Characterizing Progressive Changes in Deep Scotomas.

Authors:  Zhichao Wu; Roberta Cimetta; Emily Caruso; Robyn H Guymer
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.283

7.  Development of Visual Field Screening Procedures: A Case Study of the Octopus Perimeter.

Authors:  Andrew Turpin; Jonathan S Myers; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Incorporating Spatial Models in Visual Field Test Procedures.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Allison M McKendrick; Andrew Turpin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Sequentially optimized reconstruction strategy: A meta-strategy for perimetry testing.

Authors:  Şerife Seda Kucur; Raphael Sznitman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Assessing the GOANNA Visual Field Algorithm Using Artificial Scotoma Generation on Human Observers.

Authors:  Luke X Chong; Andrew Turpin; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.283

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.