| Literature DB >> 24781809 |
W-J Ma1, B A Pannebakker2, L W Beukeboom1, T Schwander3, L van de Zande1.
Abstract
Trait decay may occur when selective pressures shift, owing to changes in environment or life style, rendering formerly adaptive traits non-functional or even maladaptive. It remains largely unknown if such decay would stem from multiple mutations with small effects or rather involve few loci with major phenotypic effects. Here, we investigate the decay of female sexual traits, and the genetic causes thereof, in a transition from haplodiploid sexual reproduction to endosymbiont-induced asexual reproduction in the parasitoid wasp Asobara japonica. We take advantage of the fact that asexual females cured of their endosymbionts produce sons instead of daughters, and that these sons can be crossed with sexual females. By combining behavioral experiments with crosses designed to introgress alleles from the asexual into the sexual genome, we found that sexual attractiveness, mating, egg fertilization and plastic adjustment of offspring sex ratio (in response to variation in local mate competition) are decayed in asexual A. japonica females. Furthermore, introgression experiments revealed that the propensity for cured asexual females to produce only sons (because of decayed sexual attractiveness, mating behavior and/or egg fertilization) is likely caused by recessive genetic effects at a single locus. Recessive effects were also found to cause decay of plastic sex-ratio adjustment under variable levels of local mate competition. Our results suggest that few recessive mutations drive decay of female sexual traits, at least in asexual species deriving from haplodiploid sexual ancestors.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24781809 PMCID: PMC4220718 DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2014.43
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heredity (Edinb) ISSN: 0018-067X Impact factor: 3.821
Summary of sample sizes and results for the different sexual traits evaluated in asexual A. japonica females
| Untreated asexual female | 40 | 0.08±0.04 | 3 | 0 | 40 | 0 | — | — | — |
| Cured asexual female | 20 | 0.55±0.11 | 11 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| 13 | 3 | 1 | |||||||
| Sexual female | 49 | 0.88±0.13 | 43 | 0.77±0.07 | 49 | 0.67±0.07 | — | — | — |
Abbreviations: Accept, proportion of females accepting to copulate; Court, proportion of females courted by sexual males; Mate, proportion successfully mated females; Prop., proportion; Repl., number of replicates.
Twenty cured females were individually paired with a single sexual male for 24 h.
Thirteen cured females were individually paired with a group of more than 50 sexual males for 24 h.
Figure 1Proportion of females producing only sons when provided with a sexual male mating partner, for different categories of sexual–asexual hybrid females, and Wolbachia-cured asexual females (100% asexual genome). Bars indicate standard errors. The x axis represents the proportion of alleles stemming from the asexual genome for each consecutive generation. Different capital letters indicate statistical difference (P<0.01), n indicates the sample size for each generation and G1-4 refers to the different introgression generations. For logistic reasons, phenotyping of the G3 generation was not possible and therefore no data are provided.
Inferring the number of loci involved in the decay of a female sexual trait in asexuals
| Expected genotypes of offspring females ( | Aa; | AaBb; Aabb; aaBb; | AaBbCc; AaBbcc; AabbCc; Aabbcc; aaBbCc; aaBbcc; aabbCc; |
| Binomial test |
Predicted proportion of sexual–asexual hybrid females (75% of the genome from the asexual strain) producing only sons for one to three unlinked loci, and the binomial test values for the comparison of each model with the observed data (0.46; 104 out of 225 females producing only sons, data from Figure 1).
Note: The predictions are based on two alleles at each locus: A and a, B and b, C and c, respectively. Capital letters denote dominant alleles, lower-case letters recessive alleles. Fixed homozygosity at each locus is assumed for the parental populations (for the dominant alleles in the sexual, the recessive alleles in the asexual population), and there is no epistasis among different loci. The predictions of recessive allele frequency from two and three-loci genetic model are significantly lower than the observed data, and higher number of loci would predict an even lower frequency.
Figure 2Offspring sex ratios produced by females with at least one daughter (that is, females producing only sons are excluded) for different categories of sexual–asexual hybrid females and Wolbachia-cured asexual females (100% asexual genome), when mated with sexual males. Bars indicate standard errors. Different capital letters indicate statistical difference (P<0.01), n indicates the sample size for each generation and F1, G2, G4 refers to the different introgression generations.
Figure 3Offspring sex ratios produced by different sexual–asexual hybrid females and Wolbachia-cured asexual females (100% asexual genome), when alone (in gray) or in groups of three (in dark). Bars indicate standard errors. Proportions labeled with stars differ significantly (P<0.01), NS indicates non-significant differences, n with two numbers indicates the sample sizes for the single females and the groups of three females per patch, respectively, and F1, G2 refers to the different introgression generations.