RATIONALE: Degradation of frontocerebellar circuitry is a principal neural mechanism of alcoholism-related executive dysfunctions affecting impulse control and cognitive planning. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that alcoholic patients would demonstrate compromised dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) -cerebellar functional connectivity when adjusting their strategies to accommodate uncertain conditions and would recruit compensatory brain regions to overcome ineffective response patterns. METHODS: Twenty-six alcoholics and 26 healthy participants underwent functional MRI in two sequential runs while performing a decision-making task. The first run required a response regardless of level of ambiguity of the stimuli; the second run allowed a PASS option (i.e., no response choice), which was useful on ambiguous trials. RESULTS: Healthy controls demonstrated strong synchronous activity between the dACC and cerebellum while planning and executing a behavioral strategy. By contrast, alcoholics showed synchronous activity between the dACC and the premotor cortex, perhaps enabling successful compensation for accuracy and reaction time in certain conditions; however, a negative outcome of this strategy was rigidity in modifying response strategy to accommodate uncertain conditions. Compared with the alcoholic group, the control group had lower nonplanning impulsiveness, which correlated with using the option PASS to respond in uncertain conditions. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that compromised dACC-cerebellar functional circuitry contributes to recruitment of an alternative network-dACC-premotor cortex- to perform well under low-risk, unambiguous conditions. This compensatory network, however, was inadequate to enable the alcoholics to avert making poor choices in planning and executing an effective behavioral strategy in high-risk, uncertain conditions.
RATIONALE: Degradation of frontocerebellar circuitry is a principal neural mechanism of alcoholism-related executive dysfunctions affecting impulse control and cognitive planning. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that alcoholicpatients would demonstrate compromised dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) -cerebellar functional connectivity when adjusting their strategies to accommodate uncertain conditions and would recruit compensatory brain regions to overcome ineffective response patterns. METHODS: Twenty-six alcoholics and 26 healthy participants underwent functional MRI in two sequential runs while performing a decision-making task. The first run required a response regardless of level of ambiguity of the stimuli; the second run allowed a PASS option (i.e., no response choice), which was useful on ambiguous trials. RESULTS: Healthy controls demonstrated strong synchronous activity between the dACC and cerebellum while planning and executing a behavioral strategy. By contrast, alcoholics showed synchronous activity between the dACC and the premotor cortex, perhaps enabling successful compensation for accuracy and reaction time in certain conditions; however, a negative outcome of this strategy was rigidity in modifying response strategy to accommodate uncertain conditions. Compared with the alcoholic group, the control group had lower nonplanning impulsiveness, which correlated with using the option PASS to respond in uncertain conditions. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that compromised dACC-cerebellar functional circuitry contributes to recruitment of an alternative network-dACC-premotor cortex- to perform well under low-risk, unambiguous conditions. This compensatory network, however, was inadequate to enable the alcoholics to avert making poor choices in planning and executing an effective behavioral strategy in high-risk, uncertain conditions.
Authors: Edith V Sullivan; Antony J Harding; Roberta Pentney; Cynthia Dlugos; Peter R Martin; Mitchell H Parks; John E Desmond; S H Annabel Chen; Michelle R Pryor; Eve De Rosa; Adolf Pfefferbaum Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Ian H Harding; Nadia Solowij; Ben J Harrison; Michael Takagi; Valentina Lorenzetti; Dan I Lubman; Marc L Seal; Christos Pantelis; Murat Yücel Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Andrew C H Chen; Bernice Porjesz; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Chella Kamarajan; Yongqiang Tang; Kevin A Jones; David B Chorlian; Arthur T Stimus; Henri Begleiter Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner Journal: Neuroimage Date: 1995-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: F Gerard Moeller; Joel L Steinberg; Scott D Lane; Matthew Buzby; Alan C Swann; Khader M Hasan; Larry A Kramer; Ponnada A Narayana Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2007 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: David N Linsenbardt; Michael P Smoker; Sarine S Janetsian-Fritz; Christopher C Lapish Journal: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: T Schulte; Y-C Jung; E V Sullivan; A Pfefferbaum; M Serventi; E M Müller-Oehring Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Cristina Irimia; Matthew W Buczynski; Luis A Natividad; Sarah A Laredo; Nathaniel Avalos; Loren H Parsons Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2017-02-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Majd Abdallah; Natalie M Zahr; Manojkumar Saranathan; Nicolas Honnorat; Nicolas Farrugia; Adolf Pfefferbaum; Edith V Sullivan; Sandra Chanraud Journal: Cerebellum Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 3.847