| Literature DB >> 24781351 |
Gisela Chelimsky1, N Patrick McCabe, Jeffrey Janata, Robert Elston, Lu Zhang, Sarah Ialacci, Thomas Chelimsky.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) is characterized by urinary urgency, frequency, nocturia, pain worse as the bladder fills and improved after emptying. These features might suggest abnormal autonomic bladder control mechanisms. We compared the structural integrity of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in IC/BPS and control subjects.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24781351 PMCID: PMC4158271 DOI: 10.1007/s10286-014-0243-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Auton Res ISSN: 0959-9851 Impact factor: 4.435
Modified Composite Autonomic Severity Score (CASS)
| Sudomotor index | Single QSART site reduced or distal sweat volume <1/3 of proximal value |
| Single QSART site <50 % of lower limit | |
| Two or more QSART sites <50 % of limit | |
| Adrenergic index | Phase IIE reduction <40 >25 mmHg MBP, or reduced phase IIL, or pulse pressure reduction to ≤50 % of baseline |
| Increased PRT time (4–5 s) | |
| Phase IIL absent or increased PRT (6–9 s) | |
| Absent phase IV | |
| Absent phase IIL and IV and increased PRT ≥10 s | |
| The prior one plus orthostatic hypotension defined as SBP reduction ≥30 mmHg; MBP ≥20 mmHg | |
| Cardio vascular HR index | HRDB or VR reduced but >50 % of minimum |
| HRDB or VR reduced but <50 % of minimum | |
| HRDB and VR reduced but <50 % of minimum |
Each subsection allows for 1 score point (i.e. a total of 3 for sudomotor, 4 for adrenergic and 3 for cardiovascular HR index)
QSART quantitative sudomotor axon reflex, MBP mean blood pressure, PRT pressure recovery time, SBP systolic blood pressure, HR heart rate response to deep breathing, VR valsalva ratio
Summary of autonomic testing findings
| IC/BPS | Healthy |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 14 | 15 | |
| Subjects with syncope | 2 | 1 | |
| Subjects with orthostatic hypotension | 0 | 0 | |
| Sudomotor index | 1.8 ± 1.3 | 1.4 ± 1.0 | >0.05 |
| Adrenergic index | 0.6 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | >0.05 |
| CV HR index | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.1 ± 0.4 | >0.05 |
| Modified CASS | 2.4 ± 1.4 | 2.0 ± 1.1 | >0.05 |
Values are mean ± SD
Summarized data from the tilt table test
| IC/BPS | Healthy | Estimate |
| 95 % CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of subjects | 12 | 13 | |||
| Baseline | |||||
| Peak HR | 72.17 ± 15.44 | 62.08 ± 7.48 | |||
| Group differencea | 10.09 | 0.057 | (−0.352, 20.53) | ||
| Post baseline | |||||
| Peak HR interval 1 | 90.50 ± 20.83 | 79.85 ± 13.28 | 0.148 | ||
| Peak HR interval 2 | 95.67 ± 24.08 | 81.38 ± 13.04 | 0.086 | ||
| Peak HR interval 3 | 98.58 ± 25.02 | 85.54 ± 13.88 | 0.104 | ||
| Group differencea | 12.99 | 0.106 | (−3.050, 29.038) | ||
| Linear slope (pooled)b | 3.16 | <0.0001 | (1.876, 4.445) | ||
| Linear slope by group interaction (non-pooled) | 1.70 | 0.186 | (−0.887, 4.278) | ||
| Quadratic curvature (pooled)b | −0.12 | 0.867 | (−1.584, 1.344) | ||
| Quadratic curvature by group interaction (non-pooled) | −1.93 | 0.181 | (−4.833, 0.968) | ||
Peak HR data presented as mean ± SD
aIC/BPS minus healthy control
bData were pooled (healthy control and IC/BPS) as there was no difference between the fitted lines for each group. This created a model for all data post baseline
Fig. 1Mean peak heart rate data at baseline (interval 0) and during the first, second, and third 10-min blocks (intervals 1, 2, and 3, respectively) of the upright tilt. a Slopes of post-baseline trends for healthy controls and subjects with IC/BPS. Data are mean peak heart rate ± SE. b Raw mean peak HR data points for each group at their respective intervals