Literature DB >> 24781342

The Impact of Cancer on the Clinical Outcome of Patients After Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Anand Narayan1, Kelvin Hong, Michael Streiff, Russell Shinohara, Constantine Frangakis, Josef Coresh, Hyun S Kim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are placed to prevent pulmonary embolism, however, some studies have suggested that IVC filters are associated with exacerbated risks of deep vein/IVC thrombosis in cancer patients. The purpose of this study is to determine if cancer patients develop higher than expected rates of venous thromboembolism complications after filter placement compared with noncancer patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who received filters (2002 to 2006) at Johns Hopkins was conducted. Exposures and outcomes were obtained by chart review. Relative risks (RR, 95% confidence interval [CI]) for outcomes in cancer versus noncancer patients were estimated using multistate models.
RESULTS: The cohort included 702 patients-246 with cancer and 456 without cancer. Cancer patients were older, more likely to be white and have filters placed for contraindications to anticoagulation (P<0.01). The most common cancers were lung (11.8%) and colorectal (10.6%). Cancer patients had an increase in venous thromboembolism (RR 1.9 [95% CI, 1.1, 3.2]) due to more deep venous thrombosis/IVC thrombosis (RR 1.7 [95% CI, 1.0, 3.0]). Higher pulmonary embolism rates in cancer were not statistically significant (RR 2.2 [95% CI, 0.8, 5.8]).
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients have elevated risks of thrombotic complications compared with noncancer patients; however, these risks are not higher than expected based on historical controls.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24781342      PMCID: PMC4278951          DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  22 in total

1.  Inferior vena caval filters: review of a 26-year single-center clinical experience.

Authors:  C A Athanasoulis; J A Kaufman; E F Halpern; A C Waltman; S C Geller; C M Fan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference.

Authors:  John A Kaufman; Thomas B Kinney; Michael B Streiff; Ronald F Sing; Mary C Proctor; Daniel Becker; Mark Cipolle; Anthony J Comerota; Steven F Millward; Frederick B Rogers; David Sacks; Anthony C Venbrux
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.464

3.  A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis. Prévention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave Study Group.

Authors:  H Decousus; A Leizorovicz; F Parent; Y Page; B Tardy; P Girard; S Laporte; R Faivre; B Charbonnier; F G Barral; Y Huet; G Simonneau
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-02-12       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Predictors of recurrence after deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  J A Heit; D N Mohr; M D Silverstein; T M Petterson; W M O'Fallon; L J Melton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2000-03-27

5.  Comparison of National Death Index and World Wide Web death searches.

Authors:  H D Sesso; R S Paffenbarger; I M Lee
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Need for inferior vena cava filters in cancer patients: a surrogate marker for poor outcome.

Authors:  Myra F Barginear; Martin Lesser; Meredith Lukin Akerman; Marianna Strakhan; Iuliana Shapira; Thomas Bradley; Daniel R Budman
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.389

7.  A comparison of clinical outcomes with retrievable and permanent inferior vena cava filters.

Authors:  Hyun S Kim; Mark J Young; Anand K Narayan; Kelvin Hong; Robert P Liddell; Michael B Streiff
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Inferior vena cava filters in malignant disease.

Authors:  Beth P Jarrett; Matthew J Dougherty; Keith D Calligaro
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Development and validation of a predictive model for chemotherapy-associated thrombosis.

Authors:  Alok A Khorana; Nicole M Kuderer; Eva Culakova; Gary H Lyman; Charles W Francis
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-01-23       Impact factor: 22.113

10.  Recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding complications during anticoagulant treatment in patients with cancer and venous thrombosis.

Authors:  Paolo Prandoni; Anthonie W A Lensing; Andrea Piccioli; Enrico Bernardi; Paolo Simioni; Bruno Girolami; Antonio Marchiori; Paola Sabbion; Martin H Prins; Franco Noventa; Antonio Girolami
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2002-07-12       Impact factor: 22.113

View more
  4 in total

1.  Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Indications, Outcomes, and Evidence.

Authors:  Jennifer P Montgomery; John A Kaufman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-09

Review 2.  The Role of Inferior Vena Cava Filters in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Mithil B Pandhi; Kush R Desai; Robert K Ryu; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.513

3.  Retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients with cancer are safe but are they beneficial?

Authors:  Sameh Mikhail; Lindsay Hannan; Michael J Pishvaian; Craig Kessler
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Safety and Outcomes of Permanent and Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters in the Oncology Population.

Authors:  Saba S Shaikh; Suneel D Kamath; Debashis Ghosh; Robert J Lewandowski; Brandon J McMahon
Journal:  Int J Vasc Med       Date:  2020-02-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.