| Literature DB >> 24780930 |
Li Ye1, Chengzhi Lv2, George Man3, Shunpeng Song2, Peter M Elias3, Mao-Qiang Man4.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24780930 PMCID: PMC4199879 DOI: 10.1038/jid.2014.205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Invest Dermatol ISSN: 0022-202X Impact factor: 8.551
Characteristics of Subjects
| Stage | Gender | N | Mean Age ± SEM (year) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stable | Male | 15 | 33.07 ± 2.63 |
| Female | 10 | 38.60 ± 2.72 | |
| Progressive | Male | 10 | 36.20 ± 2.80 |
| Female | 9 | 36.33 ± 2.44 | |
| Normal | Male | 34 | 39.15 ± 0.96 |
| Female | 34 | 38.47 ± 1.36 | |
| 112 | |||
Figure 1Comparison of SC Biophysical Properties among Normal, Involved and Uninvolved Psoriatic Skin Sites
a & b depicts basal TEWL and barrier recovery rates, respectively. c & d presents skin surface pH and SC hydration, respectively. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM in comparison with normal skin, as shown by the horizontal dotted lines. GraphPad Prism 4 software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) was used for all statistical analysis. Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test was used to determine the difference between normal, and psoriasis involved and uninvolved skin, except in figure 1b where the differences between normal and progressive uninvolved skin were determined with unpaired T test. P<0.05 was considered to a statistically significant difference. Significant differences are shown in the figures and numbers of subjects are detailed in Table 1.