Literature DB >> 24780877

Disrupting the intrinsic growth potential of a suture contributes to midfacial hypoplasia.

Jingtao Li1, Chelsey A Johnson2, Andrew A Smith3, Benjamin Salmon4, Bing Shi5, John Brunski3, Jill A Helms6.   

Abstract

Children with unoperated cleft palates have nearly normal growth of their faces whereas patients who have had early surgical repair often exhibit midfacial hypoplasia. Surgical repair is responsible for the underlying bone growth arrest but the mechanisms responsible for these surgical sequelae are poorly understood. We simulated the effect of cleft palate repair by raising a mucoperiosteal flap in the murine palate. Three-dimensional micro-CT reconstructions of the palate along with histomorphometric measurements, finite element (FE) modeling, immunohistochemical analyses, and quantitative RT-PCR were employed to follow the skeletal healing process. Inflammatory bone resorption was observed during the first few days after denudation, which destroyed the midpalatal suture complex. FE modeling was used to predict and map the distribution of strains and their associated stresses in the area of denudation and the magnitude and location of hydrostatic and distortional strains corresponded to sites of skeletal tissue destruction. Once re-epithelialization was complete and wound contracture subsided, the midpalatal suture complex reformed. Despite this, growth at the midpalatal suture was reduced, which led to palatal constriction and a narrowing of the dental arch. Thus the simple act of raising a flap, here mimicked by denuding the mucoperiosteum, was sufficient to cause significant destruction to the midpalatal suture complex. Although the bone and cartilage growth plates were re-established, mediolateral skeletal growth was nonetheless compromised and the injured palate never reached its full growth potential. These data strongly suggest that disruption of suture complexes, which have intrinsic growth potential, should be avoided during surgical correction of congenital anomalies.
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft palate; Growth arrest; Midpalatal; Mucoperiosteal denudation; Repair

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780877     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  6 in total

Review 1.  Full-Thickness Oral Mucoperiosteal Defects: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Brittany N Allen; Qi Wang; Yassine Filali; Kristan S Worthington; Deborah S F Kacmarynski
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 7.376

2.  Linking suckling biomechanics to the development of the palate.

Authors:  Jingtao Li; Chelsey A Johnson; Andrew A Smith; Daniel J Hunter; Gurpreet Singh; John B Brunski; Jill A Helms
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Mechanical Stress Changes the Complex Interplay Between HO-1, Inflammation and Fibrosis, During Excisional Wound Repair.

Authors:  Niels A J Cremers; Maarten Suttorp; Marlous M Gerritsen; Ronald J Wong; Coby van Run-van Breda; Gooitzen M van Dam; Katrien M Brouwer; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Carine E L Carels; Ditte M S Lundvig; Frank A D T G Wagener
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2015-12-15

4.  Pattern of Morphological Variability in Unrepaired Unilateral Clefts With and Without Cleft Palate May Suggest Intrinsic Growth Deficiency.

Authors:  Benny S Latief; Mette A R Kuijpers; Adam Stebel; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Piotr S Fudalej
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-12-11

5.  Molecular Basis for Craniofacial Phenotypes Caused by Sclerostin Deletion.

Authors:  J Chen; X Yuan; I Pilawski; X Liu; J Delgado-Calle; T Bellido; H Turkkahraman; J A Helms
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 6.116

6.  WNT-activated bone grafts repair osteonecrotic lesions in aged animals.

Authors:  B Salmon; B Liu; E Shen; T Chen; J Li; M Gillette; R C Ransom; M Ezran; C A Johnson; A B Castillo; W J Shen; F B Kraemer; A A Smith; J A Helms
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.