Literature DB >> 24780289

Upper extremity kinematics and muscle activation patterns in subjects with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy.

Arjen Bergsma1, Alessio Murgia2, Edith H Cup3, Paul P Verstegen4, Kenneth Meijer5, Imelda J de Groot3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the kinematics and muscle activity of subjects with facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) and healthy control subjects during the performance of standardized upper extremity tasks.
DESIGN: Exploratory case-control study.
SETTING: A movement laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (N=19) with FSHD (n=11) and healthy control subjects (n=8) were measured.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kinematic data were recorded using a 3-dimensional motion capturing system. Muscle activities, recorded using electromyography, were obtained from 6 superficial muscles around the glenohumeral joint. Shoulder elevation and elbow flexion angles, and maximum electromyographic activity during the movements as a percentage of maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) were calculated.
RESULTS: Kinematic differences between the FSHD group and the healthy control group were found in the shoulder elevation angle during single shoulder movements and both reaching tasks. In general, subjects with FSHD had higher percentages of muscle activation. The median activity of the trapezius was close to the MVC activity during the single shoulder movements. Moreover, deltoid and pectoralis muscles were also highly active.
CONCLUSIONS: Higher activation of the trapezius in subjects with FSHD indicates a mechanism that could help relieve impaired shoulder muscles during arm elevation around shoulder height. Compared with healthy subjects, persons with FSHD activated their shoulder muscles to a greater extent during movements that required arm elevation.
Copyright © 2014 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activities of daily living; Biomechanical phenomena Electromyography; Facio-scapulo-humeral dystrophy; Muscular dystrophies; Rehabilitation; Upper extremity

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780289     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  4 in total

1.  Modifying Kinect placement to improve upper limb joint angle measurement accuracy.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Mojtaba F Fathi; Pilwon Hur; Vincent Crocher
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  A pilot study of a single intermittent arm cycling exercise programme on people affected by Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD).

Authors:  Fraser Philp; Richa Kulshrestha; Nicholas Emery; Marco Arkesteijn; Anand Pandyan; Tracey Willis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Dynamic thoracohumeral kinematics are dependent upon the etiology of the shoulder injury.

Authors:  Juan López-Pascual; Álvaro Page; Pilar Serra-Añó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: A Patients' Perspective.

Authors:  Alice Faux-Nightingale; Richa Kulshrestha; Nicholas Emery; Anand Pandyan; Tracey Willis; Fraser Philp
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-09-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.