Literature DB >> 24780062

The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) underestimates incident and recurrent fractures in consecutive patients with fragility fractures.

Sophie Roux1, François Cabana, Nathalie Carrier, Michèle Beaulieu, Pierre-Marc April, Marie-Claude Beaulieu, Gilles Boire.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The World Health Organization Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX) was developed to identify patients at risk of sustaining a fragility fracture (FF).
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate estimated FRAX probabilities of FF at the time of a FF and to compare them with the observed incidence of recurrent FF.
METHODS: A prospective cohort included men and women older than 50 years at the time of a FF. FRAX scores without bone mineral density [FRAX-body mass index (BMI)] were calculated prior to and after the inclusion FF. Recurrent FFs were recorded over a 4-year follow-up. Determinants associated with recurrent FF were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses.
RESULTS: FRAX-BMI scores were available in 1399 of the 1409 recruited patients. A high-risk FRAX-BMI score was present in only 42.7% patients before and 56.4% after the incident FF. Most FF patients at low or moderate risk before their initial FF were men, younger than 65 years, or without previous FF. Over a median follow-up of 3 years, recurrent FF occurred in 108 patients (2.69 per 100 patient-years). The overall sensitivity of post-FF FRAX to predict a recurrent FF was 71.3% and was specifically lower in patients younger than 65 years (13%) and without previous FF (63%) at inclusion.
CONCLUSIONS: The FRAX-BMI scores were below the Canadian threshold for treatment in more than half the patients at the time of a FF and in close to a third of patients with recurrent FF. FRAX-BMI severely underestimates the FF risk in patients younger than 65 years old and after a single FF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780062     DOI: 10.1210/jc.2013-4507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  12 in total

1.  Working to Increase Stability through Exercise (WISE): Study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of a coached exercise program to reduce serious fall-related injuries.

Authors:  Christopher Sciamanna; Noel H Ballentine; Melissa Bopp; Jennifer S Brach; Vernon M Chinchilli; Joseph T Ciccolo; Molly B Conroy; Abigail Fisher; Edward J Fox; Susan L Greenspan; M Jan De Beur Suzanne; Kalen Kearcher; Jennifer L Kraschnewski; Kathleen M McTigue; Edward McAuley; Natalia E Morone; Anuradha Paranjape; Sol Rodriguez-Colon; Andrew Rosenzweig; Joshua M Smyth; Kerry J Stewart; Heather L Stuckey
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Critical issues and current challenges in osteoporosis and fracture prevention. An overview of unmet needs.

Authors:  Willem F Lems; Hennie G Raterman
Journal:  Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 5.346

Review 3.  On challenges in clinical assessment of hip fracture risk using image-based biomechanical modelling: a critical review.

Authors:  Yunhua Luo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Osteosarcopenic obesity is associated with reduced handgrip strength, walking abilities, and balance in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  J Z Ilich; J E Inglis; O J Kelly; D L McGee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Comparison between real-world practice and application of the FRAX algorithm in the treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Francesca Zoccarato; Chiara Ceolin; Caterina Trevisan; Anna Citron; Labjona Haxhiaj; Aurelio Guarnaccia; Matteo Panozzo; Carlotta Campodall'Orto; Alessandra Coin; Sandro Giannini; Giuseppe Sergi
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.481

6.  The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.

Authors:  M S LeBoff; S L Greenspan; K L Insogna; E M Lewiecki; K G Saag; A J Singer; E S Siris
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 5.071

Review 7.  A biomechanical sorting of clinical risk factors affecting osteoporotic hip fracture.

Authors:  Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Risk Assessment Tools for Osteoporosis Screening in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Carolyn J Crandall
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 9.  Treatment recommendations based on fracture risk status are not consistently provided in osteoporosis guidelines.

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Matthew Gray; Daniel Mancuso; Taucha Inrig; Gilles Boire; Marie-Claude Beaulieu; Larry Funnell; Earl Bogoch
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.631

10.  What Do We Know about Individuals Who Are Assessed as Being at Moderate Risk for Future Fracture in Canada?

Authors:  Joanna E M Sale; Ravi Jain; Kosalan Akilan; Kevin Senior; Dorcas Beaton; Earl Bogoch; Gilles Boire; Marie-Claude Beaulieu; David Lightfoot; Larry Funnell
Journal:  Health (Irvine Calif)       Date:  2015-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.