Literature DB >> 24780023

Low energy fractures of the acetabulum.

N Papadakos1, R Pearce, M D Bircher.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular fractures due to high energy injuries are common and well documented; those secondary to low energy mechanisms are less well described. We undertook a retrospective study of the acetabular fracture referrals to our unit to evaluate the proportion of injuries resulting from a low energy mechanism.
METHODS: A total of 573 acetabular fractures were evaluated from 1 January 2005 to 31 December 2008. The plain radiography and computed tomography of those sustaining a low energy fracture were assessed and the fracture patterns classified.
RESULTS: Of the 573 acetabular fractures, 71 (12.4%) were recorded as being a result of a low energy mechanism. The male-to-female ratio was 2.4:1 and the mean patient age was 67.0 years (standard deviation: 19.1 years). There was a significantly higher number of fractures (p<0.001) involving the anterior column (with or without a posterior hemitransverse component) than in a number of previously conducted large acetabular fracture studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that low energy fractures make up a considerable proportion of acetabular fractures with a distinctly different fracture pattern distribution. With the continued predicted rise in the incidence of osteoporosis, life expectancy and an aging population, it is likely that this type of fracture will become increasingly more common, posing difficult management decisions and leading to procedures that are technically more challenging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24780023      PMCID: PMC4574414          DOI: 10.1308/003588414X13814021680157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  26 in total

1.  Fractures of the acetabulum: accuracy of reduction and clinical results in patients managed operatively within three weeks after the injury.

Authors:  J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  MRI and CT of insufficiency fractures of the pelvis and the proximal femur.

Authors:  Miguel C Cabarrus; Avanti Ambekar; Ying Lu; Thomas M Link
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Results of treatment of acetabular fractures.

Authors:  G F Pennal; J Davidson; H Garside; J Plewes
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis.

Authors:  P V Giannoudis; M R W Grotz; C Papakostidis; H Dinopoulos
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-01

5.  Stabilization of acetabular fractures in elderly patients.

Authors:  D L Helfet; J Borrelli; T DiPasquale; R Sanders
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Fractures of the acetabulum in patients aged 60 years and older: an epidemiological and radiological study.

Authors:  T A Ferguson; R Patel; M Bhandari; J M Matta
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2010-02

7.  Displaced acetabular fractures managed operatively: indicators of outcome.

Authors:  Dana C Mears; John H Velyvis; Chih-Peng Chang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Mortality in patients with pelvic fractures: results from the German pelvic injury register.

Authors:  Oliver Hauschild; Peter C Strohm; Ulf Culemann; Tim Pohlemann; Norbert P Suedkamp; Wolfgang Koestler; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2008-02

9.  Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study.

Authors:  J M Matta; D K Mehne; R Roffi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A review of 40 acetabular fractures: the importance of early surgery.

Authors:  R N Brueton
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.586

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Management and Outcomes of Bilateral Acetabular Fractures: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Vasileios K Mousafeiris; Anastasia Vasilopoulou; George D Chloros; Michalis Panteli; Peter V Giannoudis
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Radiological and Functional Assessment of Treatment Outcomes in Patients after Open Reduction with Internal Fixation (ORIF) of Acetabular Fractures.

Authors:  Emilia Dadura; Aleksandra Truszczyńska-Baszak; Dariusz Szydłowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Bilateral acetabular fractures: Mechanism, fracture patterns and associated injuries.

Authors:  Jarrad M Stevens; Sarah Shiels; Michael R Whitehouse; Anthony J Ward; Tim J Chesser; Mehool Acharya
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-11-06

4.  Does use of a quadrilateral surface plate improve outcome in elderly acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Graeme Nicol; Ethan Sanders; Allan Liew; Geoffrey Wilkin; Wade T Gofton; Steven Papp; George Grammatopoulos
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-07

5.  Acetabulum fractures in elderly: A systematic review of fracture pattern and treatment.

Authors:  Tarun Goyal; Gaganpreet Singh; Sujit Kumar Tripathy; Alexander Schuh; Lokesh A Veerappa; Ramesh Kumar Sen
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-09-12

Review 6.  Acetabular fractures in the elderly: modern challenges and the role of conservative management.

Authors:  Kunal Mohan; James M Broderick; Hasnain Raza; Brendan O'Daly; Michael Leonard
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 2.089

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.