BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mitral valve geometry is significantly altered secondary to left ventricular remodeling in non-ischemic and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathies. Since the extent of remodeling and asymmetry of dilatation of the ventricle differ significantly between individual patients, the valve geometry and tethering also differ. The study aim was to determine if mitral valve geometry has an impact on the efficacy of surgical repairs to eliminate regurgitation and restore valve closure in a validated experimental model. METHODS: Porcine mitral valves (n = 8) were studied in a pulsatile heart simulator, in which the mitral valve geometry can be precisely altered and controlled throughout the experiment. Baseline hemodynamics for each valve were measured (Control), and the valves were tethered in two distinct ways: annular dilatation with 7 mm apical papillary muscle (PM) displacement (Tether 1, symmetric), and annular dilatation with 7 mm apical, 7 mm posterior and 7 mm lateral PM displacement (Tether 2, asymmetric). Mitral annuloplasty was performed on each valve (Annular Repair), succeeded by anterior leaflet secondary chordal cutting (Sub-annular Repair). The efficacy of each repair in the setting of a given valve geometry was quantified by measuring the changes in mitral regurgitation (MR), leaflet coaptation length, tethering height and area. RESULTS: At baseline, none of the valves was regurgitant. Significant leaflet tethering was measured in Tether 2 over Tether 1, but both groups were significantly higher compared to baseline (60.9 +/- 31 mm2 for Control versus 129.7 +/- 28.4 mm2 for Tether 1 versus 186.4 +/- 36.3 mm2 for Tether 2). Consequently, the MR fraction was higher in Tether 2 group (23.0 +/- 5.7%) than in Tether 1 (10.5 +/- 5.5%). Mitral annuloplasty reduced MR in both groups, but remnant regurgitation after the repair was higher in Tether 2. After chordal cutting a similar trend was observed with trace regurgitation in Tether 1 group at 3.6 +/- 2.8%, in comparison to 18.6 +/- 4.2% in the Tether 2 group. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, the tethering geometry of the mitral valve impacts the valve hemodynamics after annuloplasty and chordal cutting. The quantitative assessment of valve geometry may help in tailoring a repair to the specific tethering pattern.
BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Mitral valve geometry is significantly altered secondary to left ventricular remodeling in non-ischemic and ischemic dilated cardiomyopathies. Since the extent of remodeling and asymmetry of dilatation of the ventricle differ significantly between individual patients, the valve geometry and tethering also differ. The study aim was to determine if mitral valve geometry has an impact on the efficacy of surgical repairs to eliminate regurgitation and restore valve closure in a validated experimental model. METHODS: Porcine mitral valves (n = 8) were studied in a pulsatile heart simulator, in which the mitral valve geometry can be precisely altered and controlled throughout the experiment. Baseline hemodynamics for each valve were measured (Control), and the valves were tethered in two distinct ways: annular dilatation with 7 mm apical papillary muscle (PM) displacement (Tether 1, symmetric), and annular dilatation with 7 mm apical, 7 mm posterior and 7 mm lateral PM displacement (Tether 2, asymmetric). Mitral annuloplasty was performed on each valve (Annular Repair), succeeded by anterior leaflet secondary chordal cutting (Sub-annular Repair). The efficacy of each repair in the setting of a given valve geometry was quantified by measuring the changes in mitral regurgitation (MR), leaflet coaptation length, tethering height and area. RESULTS: At baseline, none of the valves was regurgitant. Significant leaflet tethering was measured in Tether 2 over Tether 1, but both groups were significantly higher compared to baseline (60.9 +/- 31 mm2 for Control versus 129.7 +/- 28.4 mm2 for Tether 1 versus 186.4 +/- 36.3 mm2 for Tether 2). Consequently, the MR fraction was higher in Tether 2 group (23.0 +/- 5.7%) than in Tether 1 (10.5 +/- 5.5%). Mitral annuloplasty reduced MR in both groups, but remnant regurgitation after the repair was higher in Tether 2. After chordal cutting a similar trend was observed with trace regurgitation in Tether 1 group at 3.6 +/- 2.8%, in comparison to 18.6 +/- 4.2% in the Tether 2 group. CONCLUSION: In this experimental model, the tethering geometry of the mitral valve impacts the valve hemodynamics after annuloplasty and chordal cutting. The quantitative assessment of valve geometry may help in tailoring a repair to the specific tethering pattern.
Authors: Robert A Levine; Albert A Hagége; Daniel P Judge; Muralidhar Padala; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Elena Aikawa; Jonathan Beaudoin; Joyce Bischoff; Nabila Bouatia-Naji; Patrick Bruneval; Jonathan T Butcher; Alain Carpentier; Miguel Chaput; Adrian H Chester; Catherine Clusel; Francesca N Delling; Harry C Dietz; Christian Dina; Ronen Durst; Leticia Fernandez-Friera; Mark D Handschumacher; Morten O Jensen; Xavier P Jeunemaitre; Hervé Le Marec; Thierry Le Tourneau; Roger R Markwald; Jean Mérot; Emmanuel Messas; David P Milan; Tui Neri; Russell A Norris; David Peal; Maelle Perrocheau; Vincent Probst; Michael Pucéat; Nadia Rosenthal; Jorge Solis; Jean-Jacques Schott; Ehud Schwammenthal; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Jae-Kwan Song; Magdi H Yacoub Journal: Nat Rev Cardiol Date: 2015-10-20 Impact factor: 32.419
Authors: Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Matthew H Park; Michael J Paulsen; Mark Sellke; Rohun Kulkami; Hanjay Wang; Yuanjia Zhu; Justin M Farry; Alexandra T Bourdillon; Christine Callinan; Haley J Lucian; Camille E Hironaka; Daniela Deschamps; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2020-12-02 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Philipp E Bartko; Jonathan Beaudoin; Elena Aikawa; Joyce Bischoff; Robert A Levine Journal: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-03-13 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Christos G Mihos; Steve Xydas; Evin Yucel; Romain Capoulade; Roy F Williams; Maurice Mawad; Guillermo Garcia; Orlando Santana Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-06 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Manuel K Rausch; Alexander M Zöllner; Martin Genet; Brian Baillargeon; Wolfgang Bothe; E Kuhl Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2016-04-20 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Weiwei Shi; Bryant V McIver; Kanika Kalra; Eric L Sarin; Susan Schmarkey; Michael Duggan; Vinod H Thourani; Robert A Guyton; Muralidhar Padala Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2017-06-02 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Matthew H Park; Yuanjia Zhu; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Hanjay Wang; Mateo Marin-Cuartas; Michael J Paulsen; Y Joseph Woo Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-07-08