Literature DB >> 24778636

Gut microbiota and the paradox of cancer immunotherapy.

Theofilos Poutahidis1, Markus Kleinewietfeld2, Susan E Erdman3.   

Abstract

It is recently shown that beneficial environmental microbes stimulate integrated immune and neuroendocrine factors throughout the body, consequently modulating regulatory T-lymphocyte phenotypes, maintaining systemic immune balance, and determining the fate of preneoplastic lesions toward regression while sustaining whole body good health. Stimulated by a gut microbiota-centric systemic homeostasis hypothesis, we set out to explore the influence of the gut microbiome to explain the paradoxical roles of regulatory T-lymphocytes in cancer development and growth. This paradigm shift places cancer prevention and treatment into a new broader context of holobiont engineering to cultivate a tumor-suppressive macroenvironment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer immunotherapy; inflammation and cancer; probiotic bacteria; regulatory T-cells; tumor macroenvironment

Year:  2014        PMID: 24778636      PMCID: PMC3985000          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

The neoplastic process is characterized by overwhelming complexity. Cancer is comprised of a genetically unstable population of cells that proliferate at an extraordinarily high rate. Millions of cancer deaths each year make it obvious that the battle against cancer is asymmetric, with humankind often being the weaker element (1). To date, cancer research efforts directly confront malignancy by targeting properties of individual cancer cells. In 2000, Hanahan and Weinberg described that most of the research on origins and treatment of cancer had just contributed toward “adding further layers of complexity to a scientific literature that is already complex almost beyond measure” (2). In the same landmark paper, however, the authors were optimistic enough to predict groundbreaking upcoming advances in the conceptual rather than the technical level (2). They were proven right. One such advancement was the increased awareness for the importance of the tumor microenvironment in the etiopathogenesis of neoplasia (3, 4). We now know that initially transformed cells are much less autonomous in their growth than previously thought (5, 6). Among the microenvironment elements, immune cells and factors have emerged as fundamental players (4–6). Accumulating evidence suggests that tumor-associated inflammatory cell accumulation, whether overt or smoldering, could be viewed as a tumor-promoting event (7–9). These inflammatory responses enhance mutagenesis by oxidative DNA damage and shape the tumor stroma in favor of cancer cell survival and expansion (6, 10, 11). Will this knowledge base in the field of inflammation, immunity, and cancer lead to new, highly effective, and biologically safe cancer immunotherapy modalities? We assert that the outcome will depend upon the philosophy and the strategic goals that will dominate the bench-to-bedside research. We propose that research in this field should focus upon stimulating systemic innate immune balance and adaptive immune resiliency, making the mammalian host more powerful to resist its cancer challenger. One possible approach utilizes gut microbiota or microbial antigens to stimulate beneficial immune cells. On the other hand, existing immunotherapy aims to selectively interrupt immune factors to better recognize and exterminate cancer cells (12–17), an approach that may ultimately lead to host instability. To further explain this point of view, we will refer to the recently discovered paradoxical roles of regulatory T-cells (TREG) in cancer (10, 14).

TREG are Central in Preserving Systemic Immune Homeostasis and Good Health

FOXP3+ CD4+ CD25+/high TREG are dominant cellular elements of the professional suppressor arm of the immune system and are important for orchestrating the control of peripheral immunological tolerance (18). The transcription factor FOXP3 is a fundamental regulator of TREG function in rodents and humans, and so far the most reliable phenotypic indicator of their identity. Recent studies on human TREG subpopulations, however, revealed that low but discernible levels of FOXP3 expression could be detected in non-suppressive TREG or even in activated effector T-cells. It is probable that this finding reflects the inherent plasticity of TREG; FOXP3+ cells co-expressing effector T-cell phenotypic markers or cytokines may be in stages of a progressive, epigenetically regulated, phenotypical, and functional shift process (14, 16, 19–22), ultimately favorable for healthful recovery of the host after environmental challenges. The role of TREG is central in preserving immune system homeostasis for health and the balance of beneficial inflammatory responses during infections while minimizing collateral tissue damage. In cancer, however, roles of TREG are traditionally considered to be negative (14–16, 23).

TREG Gather Near Tumors and Favor Cancer Survival

A large body of data suggest that TREG gather near tumors and suppress the anti-tumor inflammatory response, thus favoring cancer cell survival. To this end, tumor-associated TREG are thought as a major impediment of anti-tumor vaccines (13–16, 23). Clinical and experimental data suggest that tumor-associated TREG recognize both self and neoantigens expressed by tumor cells, counteracting antigen-specific effector T-cell responses. Consequently, immunotherapy strategies based on the vaccination with tumor-associated antigens fail to evoke an effective response against cancer cells due to the activation and expansion of tumor antigen-specific TREG (14–16). This potential interplay of TREG within tumors has been reviewed in detail elsewhere (12–16), and has led to the proposal of several anti-TREG regimens for cancer immunotherapy. These regimens aim to deplete TREG, inhibit their suppressive function, prevent their homing into tumor sites, or block their differentiation/proliferation (12–16). Several of these TREG-targeting modalities have already been tested in the clinic, with mixed results (13, 16). Blocking TREG function by depleting the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) appears promising (24), due to the depletion of TREG from tumor tissues (25, 26). However, a similar regimen could lead to an opposite effect with the accumulation of TREG and CD8+ T-cells in tumors (27, 28). A phase III study of melanoma patients using a gp100 peptide vaccine with interleukin (IL)-2 administration led to equally promising results with discovery of TREG expansion in responding patients (29).

Gut Microbiota Induce Potent TREG with Systemic Anti-Neoplastic Properties

As the results of these trials are anticipated, the literature reveals contradictory evidence. Indeed, the studies associating high densities of tumor-associated cells expressing TREG markers including FOXP3 with a poor prognosis in several types of human cancers are now challenged by similar studies on the very same types of cancer showing the opposite outcome (30–34). The different CD8+:TREG ratios and the presence of FOXP3+ cell subsets of undetermined identity in the tumor microenvironment have been proposed as probable explanations (16). Indeed, data from animal models show under certain conditions of microbial priming that TREG not only protect but also alter the tumor microenvironment to induce remission of already established intestinal, mammary, and prostate cancers (35–41). The hypothesis that the composition of the different subsets of FOXP3+, which may include effector Foxp3+ cells, is intriguing (16). Indeed, it was previously shown that IFN-γ levels were increased during TREG-mediated tumor regression in mice (37). Further, feeding of probiotic microbes to mice induces systemic oxytocin secretion that shifts immunity toward IFN-γ and CD25 for improved wound healing capacity and systemic good health (42). A question subsequently arising is whether gut microbiota may be engineered to harness an anti-neoplastic FOXP3+ cell milieu (5, 10, 41).

Gut-Centric Hypothesis: Prior Exposures to Microbes Explain Beneficial Roles of TREG

Stimulated by a gut-centric systemic homeostasis hypothesis, we set out to explore and explain the paradoxical roles of TREG in cancer using several different mouse models of cancer and adoptive cell transfer methodologies (10). We found that TREG may suppress, promote, or have no effect in carcinogenesis depending upon their timing and prior exposure to gut bacterial antigens and presence of IL-10 (35–39, 41, 43, 44). Under some conditions, adoptive transfer of TREG rapidly led to apoptosis of emerging tumor cells (37, 45). Using as a model organism an opportunistic pathogen, Helicobacter hepaticus, commonly residing in the lower bowel of mice, we have shown in Rag2-deficient mice (otherwise lacking lymphocytes) that gut microbiota modulate inflammatory bowel disease and inflammation-associated colon cancer, a cancer process inhibited by properly functioning IL-10-dependent TREG (35, 36). Subsequently, by introducing H. hepaticus into the large bowel flora of mice lacking the APC tumor suppressor gene (Apc+), we found that intestinal polypogenesis was greatly enhanced by bacteria and subsequently suppressed by immune-competent TREG. Furthermore, adenomas of infected Apc+ mice progressed into adenocarcinoma, a transition atypical of polyps of aged-matched uninfected controls (38, 41). Interestingly, Apc+ mice having H. hepaticus in their gut flora were prone to develop cancer in tissues distant from intestine, such as prostate and the mammary glands (40, 41, 43, 46, 47). H. hepaticus-induced tumorigenic events were inhibited by supplementation with TREG from immune-competent wild type donor mice. A potent treatment to counteract these local and systemic H. hepaticus-induced tumorigenic events was supplementation with TREG in an IL-10-dependent manner (10, 36, 38–40, 44, 46, 48). Purified TREG exhibited greatest anti-cancer potency when taken from donor mice previously colonized with H. hepaticus. By contrast, TREG taken from donor mice without prior H. hepaticus exposure were ineffective, and in some cases actually enhanced tumorigenesis (10). Based on these results, we theorize that the tumor microenvironment is subject to systemic inflammatory events arising from environmental exposures in the gastrointestinal tract (Figure 1). This microbe-inducible pro-inflammatory condition contributes to tumor trophic signaling. Interestingly, bacterial antigen triggered IL-10-dependent activities in the GI-tract impart sustained protection from the aforementioned events, resulting in immune cell recruitment, including TREG, which, by being more potent in their anti-inflammatory roles, work locally and systemically to suppress sepsis, myeloid precursor mobilization, and inflammatory signaling important in extra-intestinal cancer evolution (10, 43). These systemic events comprise the tumor macroenvironment.
Figure 1

Gut bacteria–host crosstalk is continuous and reciprocal in the cancer macroenvironment. Beneficial microbes trigger IL-10-mediated GI-tract immune and neuronal networks that lower systemic inflammatory tone and up-regulate hypothalamic–hypophyseal targets, including oxytocin, constituting a gut–systemic immunity-endocrine-axis. In this way, microbiota stimulate CD4+ lymphocytes including regulatory T cells (TREG) that suppress, promote, or have no effect in carcinogenesis depending upon their timing and prior exposure to gut bacterial antigens and presence of interleukin (IL)-10. This places neoplastic development and growth into a new broader context of the holobiont (comprised of the mammalian host plus resident microbes) and the cancer macroenvironment, highlighting microbes that may be engineered for sustained good health.

Gut bacteria–host crosstalk is continuous and reciprocal in the cancer macroenvironment. Beneficial microbes trigger IL-10-mediated GI-tract immune and neuronal networks that lower systemic inflammatory tone and up-regulate hypothalamic–hypophyseal targets, including oxytocin, constituting a gut–systemic immunity-endocrine-axis. In this way, microbiota stimulate CD4+ lymphocytes including regulatory T cells (TREG) that suppress, promote, or have no effect in carcinogenesis depending upon their timing and prior exposure to gut bacterial antigens and presence of interleukin (IL)-10. This places neoplastic development and growth into a new broader context of the holobiont (comprised of the mammalian host plus resident microbes) and the cancer macroenvironment, highlighting microbes that may be engineered for sustained good health. The roles of intestinal microflora in promoting cancer development within the bowel have been well established (35, 49–52). Linking gut microbial flora and local and systemic effects that promote (38) or suppress (45) tumors throughout the body, expands this paradigm in a challenging manner. Recent findings show that gut flora imbalances considerably undermine the response to both immune (53, 54) and non-immune chemotherapeutic regimens, such as cisplatin and oxaliplatin (53).

A Weakened TREG Feedback Loop Unifies Autoimmune Diseases and Cancer

These gut microbe-centric findings in mice are consistent with the “hygiene hypothesis,” according to which insufficient microbial exposures earlier in life predispose to allergies, autoimmune disorders, and uncontrollable inflammation-associated pathologies later in life. We have shown that the basic principles of this hypothesis may apply not only to auto-immunity, but also to neoplastic disease as well, and that TREG play a central role in this phenomenon (10, 41, 55). The ability of TREG to decrease risk for cancer and counteract established tumors depends upon microbe-triggered IL-10, which works to maintain immune system homeostasis and reinforce a protective anti-inflammatory, anti-neoplastic TREG phenotype (41). TREG display inherent phenotypic plasticity (10). Hygienic individuals with a weakened IL-10 and TREG feedback loop are prone to a re-direction of unstable resting peripheral TREG toward a T helper (Th)-17 pro-inflammatory process. As a result “hygienic” subjects are at higher risk to develop auto-immune diseases and cancer (10). It is tempting to postulate that this may explain why only a few people go on to develop cancer, while nearly everyone bears dysplastic and early neoplastic lesions throughout their body (56). Depending on composition of gut microbiota, the immune system of mice may acquire different subclinical characteristics, even in the absence of overt inflammatory processes. The clinically silent immune system status may determine the risk of developing sporadic cancer in epithelia throughout the body. Further, we found that consuming beneficial probiotic bacteria led to the expansion of a Foxp3+ cell population in the periphery (42, 45, 57) conferring protection to diet-related and genetic predisposition to mammary cancer (45). Targeted oral challenge with such probiotic bacteria resulted in the activation of interrelated systemic inflammatory and metabolic pathways, either through blood circulation or via the vagus nerve (Figure 1). Consequently, there was an upregulation of systemic hormone levels, such as oxytocin, testosterone, and thyroxin. Oxytocin serves to sustain immune and integumentary homeostasis, biasing the immune system toward IL-10 and IFN-γ, without anergy, subsequently minimizing the deleterious systemic effects of IL-17 (57). This altered immune system and metabolic profile of mice imparted healthful phenotypes including shiny fur and youthful hair follicle cycling, accelerated skin wound healing capacity, and resistance to diet-induced obesity and senility (42, 47, 57, 58). Through tightly regulated immune activities, competent TREG permit brief beneficial host inflammatory responses to eliminate invading pathogens, and later inhibit chronic deleterious inflammatory tissue damage (43). The results of our wound healing assays further suggest that the probiotic microbe-induced enhancement of the TREG-dominated arm of the immune system did not compromise the ability of mice to respond to invading pathogens (42).

Beneficial Systemic Effects of Gut Microbes are Transplantable via Foxp3+ TREG into Naïve Hosts

Adoptive cell transfer models offer mechanistic insight as these beneficial effects were isolated to bacteria-primed TREG (42, 47, 57–59). In fact, healthful phenotypes were entirely reproducible in naive recipient mice by the adoptive transfer of highly purified TREG derived from probiotic-fed cell donors (42, 57, 59). These results suggest gut microbe-induced crosstalk with the host in a continuous and reciprocal manner. The fate of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions arising in epithelia throughout the body depends upon this macroenvironment at the whole organism level. Consequently, the tumor macroenvironment is defined as the “holobiont,” i.e., the mammalian organism plus the microbial symbionts it bears. The TREG population is a central player of the tumor macroenvironment connecting gut bacteria with reproductive fitness, youthful phenotypes, and anti-neoplastic properties.

Microbial Engineering Offers New Strategies for Public Health

Taken together, microbial engineering strategies using food-grade bacteria highlight alternative directions in cancer immunotherapy. Modulating beneficial TREG via diet is a biologically safe and efficient approach, originating from genetic programs that have been shaped during the millions of years of co-evolution of mammals with their gut bacteria symbionts. These attributes remain largely inactive in individuals with a modern lifestyle, Westernized dietary habits, and stringent hygiene practices. Awakening these latent TREG-mediated capabilities may provide an alternative avenue to reduce cancer risk at a population level for public health. The perspectives presented here should be considered as an alternative paradigm – not only for fighting cancer – but also for promoting overall good health and longevity.

Author Contributions

Theofilos Poutahidis, Markus Kleinewietfeld, and Susan E. Erdman wrote the paper.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  58 in total

Review 1.  Regulatory T cells in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Hiroyoshi Nishikawa; Shimon Sakaguchi
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 7.486

Review 2.  Infection, immunoregulation, and cancer.

Authors:  Graham A W Rook; Angus Dalgleish
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 12.988

3.  CD4+CD25+ regulatory lymphocytes induce regression of intestinal tumors in ApcMin/+ mice.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Jane J Sohn; Varada P Rao; Prashant R Nambiar; Zhongming Ge; James G Fox; David B Schauer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

4.  Intestinal inflammation targets cancer-inducing activity of the microbiota.

Authors:  Janelle C Arthur; Ernesto Perez-Chanona; Marcus Mühlbauer; Sarah Tomkovich; Joshua M Uronis; Ting-Jia Fan; Barry J Campbell; Turki Abujamel; Belgin Dogan; Arlin B Rogers; Jonathan M Rhodes; Alain Stintzi; Kenneth W Simpson; Jonathan J Hansen; Temitope O Keku; Anthony A Fodor; Christian Jobin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  The plasticity of human Treg and Th17 cells and its role in autoimmunity.

Authors:  Markus Kleinewietfeld; David A Hafler
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 11.130

Review 6.  Regulatory-T-cell inhibition versus depletion: the right choice in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Mario P Colombo; Silvia Piconese
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 60.716

Review 7.  Breast cancer: should gastrointestinal bacteria be on our radar screen?

Authors:  Varada P Rao; Theofilos Poutahidis; James G Fox; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Rapid reversal of interleukin-6-dependent epithelial invasion in a mouse model of microbially induced colon carcinoma.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Kevin M Haigis; Varada P Rao; Prashant R Nambiar; Christie L Taylor; Zhongming Ge; Koichiro Watanabe; Anne Davidson; Bruce H Horwitz; James G Fox; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 4.944

9.  Nitric oxide and TNF-alpha trigger colonic inflammation and carcinogenesis in Helicobacter hepaticus-infected, Rag2-deficient mice.

Authors:  S E Erdman; V P Rao; T Poutahidis; A B Rogers; C L Taylor; E A Jackson; Z Ge; C W Lee; D B Schauer; G N Wogan; S R Tannenbaum; J G Fox
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory lymphocytes require interleukin 10 to interrupt colon carcinogenesis in mice.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Varada P Rao; Theofilos Poutahidis; Melanie M Ihrig; Zhongming Ge; Yan Feng; Michal Tomczak; Arlin B Rogers; Bruce H Horwitz; James G Fox
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  12 in total

1.  Metastasis and the evolution of dispersal.

Authors:  Tazzio Tissot; François Massol; Beata Ujvari; Catherine Alix-Panabieres; Nicolas Loeuille; Frédéric Thomas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Gut bacteria and cancer.

Authors:  Susan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-06-04

3.  Cholera-toxin suppresses carcinogenesis in a mouse model of inflammation-driven sporadic colon cancer.

Authors:  Michael Doulberis; Katerina Angelopoulou; Eleni Kaldrymidou; Anastasia Tsingotjidou; Zaphiris Abas; Suzan E Erdman; Theofilos Poutahidis
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-12-30       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Dietary microbes modulate transgenerational cancer risk.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Bernard J Varian; Tatiana Levkovich; Jessica R Lakritz; Sheyla Mirabal; Caitlin Kwok; Yassin M Ibrahim; Sean M Kearney; Antonis Chatzigiagkos; Eric J Alm; Susan E Erdman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Old enemies meet new friends for colon cancer prevention.

Authors:  Theofilos Poutahidis; Katerina Angelopoulou; Suzan E Erdman
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 8.110

Review 6.  Human Microbiome Engineering: The Future and Beyond.

Authors:  Arunava Kali
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

Review 7.  The Concept of Hormesis in Cancer Therapy - Is Less More?

Authors:  Andy Gaya; Charles A Akle; Satvinder Mudan; John Grange
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Suppression of colorectal tumorigenesis by recombinant Bacteroides fragilis enterotoxin-2 in vivo.

Authors:  You Lv; Tao Ye; Hui-Peng Wang; Jia-Ying Zhao; Wen-Jie Chen; Xin Wang; Chen-Xia Shen; Yi-Bin Wu; Yuan-Kun Cai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Complex interactions between the microbiome and cancer immune therapy.

Authors:  Drew J Schwartz; Olivia N Rebeck; Gautam Dantas
Journal:  Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 6.250

10.  Oxaliplatin-induced changes in microbiota, TLR4+ cells and enhanced HMGB1 expression in the murine colon.

Authors:  Vanesa Stojanovska; Rachel M McQuade; Sarah Fraser; Monica Prakash; Shakuntla Gondalia; Rhian Stavely; Enzo Palombo; Vasso Apostolopoulos; Samy Sakkal; Kulmira Nurgali
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.