| Literature DB >> 24778560 |
Farah Y Abdelmontalab1, Elmula I Fadl2, Hm Abushama1, K Kreskowski3, T Liehr3.
Abstract
Meningioma is the second most common adult central nervous system tumor. Mutations and/or deletions within the tumor suppressor gene neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) are associated with meningioma development and progression. We studied 29 meningioma samples by cytogenetic analysis and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH) using a locus-specific probe for the NF2 gene region. We detected loss of the NF2 gene in all samples except for one. In 10 of the 29 samples, karyotypic analyses confirmed the I-FISH results and revealed additional numerical and/or structural rearrangements in nine of them. Our study confirmed: i) the limited role of banding cytogenetics in assessing chromosomal rearrangements in meningioma, as this tumor is hard to be grown in cell culture; ii) we could show that two-color I-FISH is well-suited for NF2-deletion screening. Our results were in accordance with those of comparable studies, even though the frequency of 97.0% of meningiomas with NF2 deletions is exceptionally high in the studied Sudanese patients.Entities:
Keywords: Banding cytogenetics; Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH); Meningioma; NF2 Gene; Sudan; Tumor suppressor gene
Year: 2013 PMID: 24778560 PMCID: PMC4001412 DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2013-0028
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Balkan J Med Genet ISSN: 1311-0160 Impact factor: 0.519
Results obtained in 29 Sudanese Meningioma Patients.
| 1 | F-40 | 45,XX,t(6;10)(q26;q26.2),-22 | -22 (100.0) |
| 2 | F-45 | 45,XX,-22 | -22 (80.0) |
| 3 | M-26 | 44,XY,-5,-22 | -22 (90.0) |
| 4 | M-26 | 45,XY,t(5;11)(q35.2;p13),-22 | -22 (100.0) |
| 5 | M-26 | 45,XY,del(8)(q22.2q23.3),-22 | -22 (100.0) |
| 6 | M-45 | 44,XY,-14,t(6;10)(q26;q26.2),-22 | -22 (100.0) |
| 7 | M-50 | 44,XY,-14,-22 | -22 (100.0) |
| 8 | F-40 | not available | -22 (90.0) |
| 9 | F-52 | not available | -22 (70.0) |
| 10 | F-36 | not available | -22 (100.0) |
| 11 | F-45 | not available | -22 (70.0) |
| 12 | M-15 | not available | -22 (100.0) |
| 13 | M-28 | not available | -22 (90.0) |
| 14 | F-45 | not available | -22 (80.0) |
| 15 | M-18 | not available | -22 (100.0) |
| 16 | F-45 | not available | -22 (60.0) |
| 17 | M-20 | not available | -22 (90.0) |
| 18 | F-45 | not available | -22 (70.0) |
| 19 | F-55 | not available | -22 (100.0) |
| 20 | M-30 | not available | -22 (70.0) |
| 21 | M-45 | not available | -22 (80.0) |
| 22 | M-16 | not available | -22 (70.0) |
| 23 | M-40 | 45,XY,-8,del(22)(q11q13) | del(NF2) (100.0) |
| 24 | F-40 | 46,XX,del(22)(q11q13) | del(NF2) (100.0) |
| 25 | F-37 | not available | del(NF2) (100.0) |
| 26 | M-52 | not available | del(NF2) (80.0) |
| 27 | F-38 | not available | del(NF2) (90.0) |
| 28 | F-30 | not available | del(NF2) (70.0) |
| 29 | M-40 | 46,XY | normal (100.0) |
Figure 1.Typical two-color I-FISH results are depicted for three interphase nuclei of the melanoma patients. A) Two signals each in red and green were interpreted as a normal result, indicating the presence of two PROBABLY intact chromosomes 22. B) Loss of one red signal was interpreted as interstitial or terminal loss of chromosome 22q including the NF2 gene region. C) Loss of one red and one green signal were interpreted as mono-somy 22. D) Schematic depiction of the probes and their localization on chromosome 22 (#22).