Literature DB >> 24778044

Preoperative assessment of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients undergoing hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following cytoreductive surgery.

Enrico M Pasqual1, Serena Bertozzi, Stefano Bacchetti, Ambrogio P Londero, Stefano M M Basso, Davide A Santeufemia, Giovanni Lo Re, Franco Lumachi.   

Abstract

The present study evaluates the accuracy of computed tomographic (CT) scan and positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)/CT for the quantification of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Data were retrospectively collected for 58 patients, who were considered for CRS and HIPEC. The predictability, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy values of FDG-PET/CT and CT were tested. Preoperative CT and FDG-PET/CT failed to detect PC in 9% and 17% of cases, respectively, with a sensitivity of 91% and 82%, a specificity of 33% and 67%, an area under the curve (AUC) of 62% and 74% and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.27 (CI.95 0.07-1.09) and 0.27 (CI.95 0.11-0.62), respectively (p=0.469). Both techniques showed a high prevalence of PC extent underestimation (CT 47% and FDG-PET/CT 43% of cases). Small bowel involvement and optimal CRS had a prevalence of 60% and 76%, respectively, and both the CT and FDG-PET/CT imaging techniques were inaccurate at predicting them (AUC 53% and 52% for small bowel involvement, and 63% and 58% for optimal CRS, respectively). In conclusion both CT and FDG-PET/CT had low preoperative staging reliability for PC, and this can strongly influence the ability to implement the correct treatment strategy for patients with PC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRS; CT; HIPEC; PET; PET/CT; Peritoneal carcinomatosis; computed tomography; cytoreductive surgery; hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; positron emission tomography

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24778044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  12 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of doubling time in patients undergoing radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroaki Miyake; Koji Murono; Hiroshi Nagata; Hiroaki Nozawa; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Yasutaka Shuno; Kazuhito Sasaki; Soichiro Ishihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-02-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Preoperative Circulating Tumor DNA in Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis is an Independent Predictor of Progression-Free Survival.

Authors:  Joel M Baumgartner; Victoria M Raymond; Richard B Lanman; Lisa Tran; Kaitlyn J Kelly; Andrew M Lowy; Razelle Kurzrock
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Peritoneal Cell-Free Tumor DNA as Biomarker for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies.

Authors:  Katie M Leick; Austin G Kazarian; Maheen Rajput; Ann Tomanek-Chalkley; Ann Miller; Hannah R Shrader; Ashley McCarthy; Kristen L Coleman; Pashtoon M Kasi; Carlos H F Chan
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Outcome following incomplete surgical cytoreduction combined with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  Roisin Mary Heaney; Conor Shields; Jurgen Mulsow
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12-15

Review 5.  Peritoneal malignancy: anatomy, pathophysiology and an update on modern day imaging.

Authors:  Jack W Power; Philip J Dempsey; Andrew Yates; Helen Fenlon; Jurgen Mulsow; Conor Shields; Carmel G Cronin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 3.629

Review 6.  Surgical technology and pharmacology of hyperthermic perioperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker; Kurt Van der Speeten
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-02

Review 7.  Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases: A Systematic Review of Current and Emerging Trends in Clinical and Translational Research.

Authors:  Foteini Stefania Koumpa; Diamantis Xylas; Maciej Konopka; Dieter Galea; Kirill Veselkov; Anthony Antoniou; Akash Mehta; Reza Mirnezami
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer.

Authors:  Serena Bertozzi; Ambrogio P Londero; Carla Cedolini; Alessandro Uzzau; Luca Seriau; Sergio Bernardi; Stefano Bacchetti; Enrico Maria Pasqual; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-11-10

Review 9.  Pathophysiology of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Role of the peritoneum.

Authors:  Lieselotte Lemoine; Paul Sugarbaker; Kurt Van der Speeten
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Microscopic peritoneal carcinomatosis in gastric cancer: Prevalence, prognosis and predictive factors.

Authors:  Enrico Maria Pasqual; Serena Bertozzi; Ambrogio P Londero; Denise Brandolin; Laura Mariuzzi; Alessandro De Pellegrin; Stefano Bacchetti; Loris Zoratti; Roberto Petri; Carlo Della Bianca; Daniele Snidero; Giovanni Terrosu; Alessandro Uzzau; Andrea Risaliti; Carla Di Loreto; Stefano Pizzolitto; Maurizio Zilli; Giovanni de Manzoni
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-11-17       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.