Elizabeth Fleet1, G Gopal Rao2, Bharat Patel3, Barry Cookson4, Andre Charlett5, Clive Bowman6, Peter Davey7. 1. Centre for Ethnicity and Infection and Microbiology Department, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK. 2. Centre for Ethnicity and Infection and Microbiology Department, North West London Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK ggopalrao@nhs.net. 3. Public Health England, Public Health Laboratory London, Division of Infection, Barts Health NHS Trust, Whitechapel, London E1 2ES, UK. 4. Division of Infection and Immunity, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. 5. Public Health England Colindale, 61 Colindale Avenue, London NW9 5HT, UK. 6. School of Health Sciences, City University London, Northampton Square, London EC1V 0HB, UK. 7. Population Health Sciences Division, Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Mackenzie Building, Kirsty Semple Way, Dundee DD2 4BF, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of 'Resident Antimicrobial Management Plan' (RAMP), a novel antimicrobial stewardship tool on systemic antibiotic use for treatment of infection in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: A pilot cluster randomized control study was conducted in 30 NHs in London. Pre-intervention, we collected point prevalence data on antimicrobial use on three occasions and total antimicrobial consumption for a 12 week period. Post-intervention data were collected in the same manner and included assessment of compliance with RAMP in the intervention group (IG). RESULTS: The number of residents included was 1628 pre-intervention [825 IG/803 control group (CG)] and 1610 post-intervention (838 IG/772 CG). The corresponding pre- and post-intervention point prevalence of systemic antibiotic prescribing for treatment of infection was 6.46% and 6.52% in the IG [estimated prevalence ratio: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.81-1.25), P = 0.94] compared with 5.27% and 5.83%, respectively, in the CG [estimated prevalence ratio: 1.11 (95% CI: 0.87-1.41), P = 0.4]. Total antibiotic consumption was 69.78 defined daily doses/1000 residents/day (DRD) pre-intervention and 66.53 DRD post-intervention in the IG compared with 49.68 and 51.92 DRD, respectively, in the CG. There was a significant decrease of 4.9% (3.25 DRD) in the IG (95% CI: 1.0%-8.6%) (P = 0.02) compared with a significant increase of 5.1% (2.24 DRD) in the CG (95% CI: 0.2%-10.2%) (P = 0.04). Main indications for antibiotics were lower respiratory tract infections (34.1%), urinary tract infections (28.5%) and skin/soft tissue infections (25.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that use of RAMP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total antibiotic consumption and has the potential to be an important antimicrobial stewardship tool for NHs.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of 'Resident Antimicrobial Management Plan' (RAMP), a novel antimicrobial stewardship tool on systemic antibiotic use for treatment of infection in nursing homes (NHs). METHODS: A pilot cluster randomized control study was conducted in 30 NHs in London. Pre-intervention, we collected point prevalence data on antimicrobial use on three occasions and total antimicrobial consumption for a 12 week period. Post-intervention data were collected in the same manner and included assessment of compliance with RAMP in the intervention group (IG). RESULTS: The number of residents included was 1628 pre-intervention [825 IG/803 control group (CG)] and 1610 post-intervention (838 IG/772 CG). The corresponding pre- and post-intervention point prevalence of systemic antibiotic prescribing for treatment of infection was 6.46% and 6.52% in the IG [estimated prevalence ratio: 1.01 (95% CI: 0.81-1.25), P = 0.94] compared with 5.27% and 5.83%, respectively, in the CG [estimated prevalence ratio: 1.11 (95% CI: 0.87-1.41), P = 0.4]. Total antibiotic consumption was 69.78 defined daily doses/1000 residents/day (DRD) pre-intervention and 66.53 DRD post-intervention in the IG compared with 49.68 and 51.92 DRD, respectively, in the CG. There was a significant decrease of 4.9% (3.25 DRD) in the IG (95% CI: 1.0%-8.6%) (P = 0.02) compared with a significant increase of 5.1% (2.24 DRD) in the CG (95% CI: 0.2%-10.2%) (P = 0.04). Main indications for antibiotics were lower respiratory tract infections (34.1%), urinary tract infections (28.5%) and skin/soft tissue infections (25.1%). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated that use of RAMP was associated with a statistically significant decrease in total antibiotic consumption and has the potential to be an important antimicrobial stewardship tool for NHs.
Authors: Keith W Hamilton; Jeffrey S Gerber; Rebekah Moehring; Deverick J Anderson; Michael S Calderwood; Jennifer H Han; Jimish M Mehta; Lori A Pollack; Theoklis Zaoutis; Arjun Srinivasan; Bernard C Camins; David N Schwartz; Ebbing Lautenbach Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2015-01-16 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Tamar F Barlam; Sara E Cosgrove; Lilian M Abbo; Conan MacDougall; Audrey N Schuetz; Edward J Septimus; Arjun Srinivasan; Timothy H Dellit; Yngve T Falck-Ytter; Neil O Fishman; Cindy W Hamilton; Timothy C Jenkins; Pamela A Lipsett; Preeti N Malani; Larissa S May; Gregory J Moran; Melinda M Neuhauser; Jason G Newland; Christopher A Ohl; Matthew H Samore; Susan K Seo; Kavita K Trivedi Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2016-04-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Robin L P Jump; Christopher J Crnich; Lona Mody; Suzanne F Bradley; Lindsay E Nicolle; Thomas T Yoshikawa Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Morgan J Katz; Ayse P Gurses; Pranita D Tamma; Sara E Cosgrove; Melissa A Miller; Robin L P Jump Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2017-11-13 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sif Helene Arnold; Jette Nygaard Jensen; Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Volkert Siersma; Lars Bjerrum; Anne Holm Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2020-05-08