Literature DB >> 24777752

Automated Aufbau of antibody structures from given sequences using Macromoltek's SmrtMolAntibody.

Monica Berrondo1, Susana Kaufmann, Manuel Berrondo.   

Abstract

This study was a part of the second antibody modeling assessment. The assessment is a blind study of the performance of multiple software programs used for antibody homology modeling. In the study, research groups were given sequences for 11 antibodies and asked to predict their corresponding structures. The results were measured using root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) between the submitted models and X-ray crystal structures. In 10 of 11 cases, the results using SmrtMolAntibody show good agreement between the submitted models and X-ray crystal structures. In the first stage, the average rmsd was 1.4 Å. Average rmsd values for the framework was 1.2 Å and for the H3 loop was 3.0 Å. In stage two, there was a slight improvement with an rmsd for the H3 loop of 2.9 Å.
© 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Keywords:  CDRH3; antibody modeling; homology modeling; loop modeling; modeling; protein structure prediction; structure prediction; web server

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777752     DOI: 10.1002/prot.24595

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  11 in total

1.  MoFvAb: Modeling the Fv region of antibodies.

Authors:  Alexander Bujotzek; Angelika Fuchs; Changtao Qu; Jörg Benz; Stefan Klostermann; Iris Antes; Guy Georges
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Large-scale sequence and structural comparisons of human naive and antigen-experienced antibody repertoires.

Authors:  Brandon J DeKosky; Oana I Lungu; Daechan Park; Erik L Johnson; Wissam Charab; Constantine Chrysostomou; Daisuke Kuroda; Andrew D Ellington; Gregory C Ippolito; Jeffrey J Gray; George Georgiou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Accurate Structure Prediction of CDR H3 Loops Enabled by a Novel Structure-Based C-Terminal Constraint.

Authors:  Brian D Weitzner; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 4.  How repertoire data are changing antibody science.

Authors:  Claire Marks; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Fully automated antibody structure prediction using BIOVIA tools: Validation study.

Authors:  Helen Kemmish; Marc Fasnacht; Lisa Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  ABodyBuilder: Automated antibody structure prediction with data-driven accuracy estimation.

Authors:  Jinwoo Leem; James Dunbar; Guy Georges; Jiye Shi; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 7.  Antibody H3 Structure Prediction.

Authors:  C Marks; C M Deane
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.271

8.  High-accuracy modeling of antibody structures by a search for minimum-energy recombination of backbone fragments.

Authors:  Christoffer H Norn; Gideon Lapidoth; Sarel J Fleishman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2016-10-24

9.  Geometric potentials from deep learning improve prediction of CDR H3 loop structures.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ruffolo; Carlos Guerra; Sai Pooja Mahajan; Jeremias Sulam; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Computational approaches to therapeutic antibody design: established methods and emerging trends.

Authors:  Richard A Norman; Francesco Ambrosetti; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Lucy J Colwell; Sebastian Kelm; Sandeep Kumar; Konrad Krawczyk
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 11.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.