Literature DB >> 24777661

A comparison of complications in 400 patients after native nail versus silicone nail splints for fingernail splinting after injuries.

Christian Weinand1, Erhan Demir, Rolf Lefering, Bettina Juon, Esther Voegelin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The fingertip is the most commonly injured part of the hand and is an important aesthetic part of the hand.
METHODS: In this retrospective study we analyzed data from 700 patients operated on between 1997 and 2008 for complications after nail splinting with native nail or silicone nail. Inclusion criteria were patients living in Bern/Berner Land, complete documentation, same surgical team, standard antibiotics, acute trauma, no nail bed transplantation, and no systemic diseases. Groups were analyzed for differences in age, gender, cause and extension of trauma, bony injury and extent, infection, infectious agent, and nail deformities. Statistical analysis was done using the χ (2) test, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: A total of 401 patients, with a median age of 39.5 years, were included. There were more men with injured nails. Two hundred forty native nails and 161 silicone splints were used. There were 344 compression injuries, 44 amputations, and 13 avulsion injuries. Forty-three patients had an infection, with gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) causing most infections. A total of 157 nail dystrophies were observed, split nails most often. The native nail splint group showed significantly (p < 0.015) fewer nail deformities than the silicone nail splint group; otherwise, there were no statistical differences. However, there were twice as many infections in the silicone nail group.
CONCLUSION: It seems to be advantageous to use the native nail for splinting after trauma, when possible. In case of a destroyed and unusable nail plate, a nail substitute has to be used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777661     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2583-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  11 in total

1.  A brief overview of the 1999 CDC Guideline for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Authors:  A J Mangram
Journal:  J Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.714

Review 2.  Acute nail bed injuries.

Authors:  Richard E Brown
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 1.907

3.  A dressing for repair of acute nail bed injury.

Authors:  M S Cohen; W L Hennrikus; M J Botte
Journal:  Orthop Rev       Date:  1990-10

Review 4.  External fixation of injured nail bed with the INRO surgical nail splint.

Authors:  E O Ogunro
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  A nasogastric catheter splint for a nailbed.

Authors:  Alper Bayraktar; Mesut Ozcan
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.539

6.  Nail bed secured with a syringe splint.

Authors:  Abdullah Etöz; Ahmet Kahraman; Yeşim Ozgenel
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.730

7.  Shiny-side down is best for foil splints after nailbed repairs.

Authors:  James Henderson
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  A technique of acrylic nail fixation in multilayered silicone finger prostheses.

Authors:  M E Leow; W K Ng; B P Pereira; K A Kueh; R W Pho
Journal:  Prosthet Orthot Int       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.895

9.  Antibiotic resistance genes and virulence factors in Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis from diseased farm animals: pigs, cattle and poultry.

Authors:  V Seputiene; A Bogdaite; M Ruzauskas; E Suziedeliene
Journal:  Pol J Vet Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 0.821

10.  Non-operative treatment of common finger injuries.

Authors:  Matthew E Oetgen; Seth D Dodds
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  [Management of peripheral injuries of the finger].

Authors:  A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.000

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.