Literature DB >> 24777647

Comparative effectiveness of liver transplant strategies for end-stage liver disease patients on renal replacement therapy.

Yaojen Chang1, Lorenzo Gallon, Colleen Jay, Kirti Shetty, Bing Ho, Josh Levitsky, Talia Baker, Daniela Ladner, John Friedewald, Michael Abecassis, Gordon Hazen, Anton I Skaro.   

Abstract

There are complex risk-benefit tradeoffs with different transplantation strategies for end-stage liver disease patients on renal support. Using a Markov discrete-time state transition model, we compared survival for this group with 3 strategies: simultaneous liver-kidney (SLK) transplantation, liver transplantation alone (LTA) followed by immediate kidney transplantation if renal function did not recover, and LTA followed by placement on the kidney transplant wait list. Patients were followed for 30 years from the age of 50 years. The probabilities of events were synthesized from population data and clinical trials according to Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores (21-30 and >30) to estimate input parameters. Sensitivity analyses tested the impact of uncertainty on survival. Overall, the highest survival rates were seen with SLK transplantation for both MELD score groups (82.8% for MELD scores of 21-30 and 82.5% for MELD scores > 30 at 1 year), albeit at the cost of using kidneys that might not be needed. Liver transplantation followed by kidney transplantation led to higher survival rates (77.3% and 76.4%, respectively, at 1 year) than placement on the kidney transplant wait list (75.1% and 74.3%, respectively, at 1 year). When uncertainty was considered, the results indicated that the waiting time and renal recovery affected conclusions about survival after SLK transplantation and liver transplantation, respectively. The subgroups with the longest durations of pretransplant renal replacement therapy and highest MELD scores had the largest absolute increases in survival with SLK transplantation versus sequential transplantation. In conclusion, the findings demonstrate the inherent tension in choices about the use of available kidneys and suggest that performing liver transplantation and using renal transplantation only for those who fail to recover their native renal function could free up available donor kidneys. These results could inform discussions about transplantation policy.
© 2014 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24777647      PMCID: PMC4146665          DOI: 10.1002/lt.23899

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  26 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of 27 patients after combined liver-kidney transplantation.

Authors:  M Lang; U Neumann; A Kahl; T Steinmüller; U Settmacher; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  2001 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Combined liver-kidney and liver transplantation in patients with renal failure outcomes in the MELD era.

Authors:  Timothy M Schmitt; Sean C Kumer; Abdullah Al-Osaimi; Neeral Shah; Curtis K Argo; Carl Berg; Timothy L Pruett; Patrick G Northup
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 3.782

3.  State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3.

Authors:  Uwe Siebert; Oguzhan Alagoz; Ahmed M Bayoumi; Beate Jahn; Douglas K Owens; David J Cohen; Karen M Kuntz
Journal:  Value Health       Date:  2012 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.725

Review 4.  Combined liver and kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Haris Papafragkakis; Paul Martin; Enver Akalin
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.640

5.  Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation.

Authors:  J M Llovet; J Fuster; J Bruix
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 17.425

6.  Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant.

Authors:  R A Wolfe; V B Ashby; E L Milford; A O Ojo; R E Ettenger; L Y Agodoa; P J Held; F K Port
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Hepatorenal syndrome: a review.

Authors:  Gianni Testino; Carlo Ferro
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

8.  Pretransplant predictors of recovery of renal function after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Patrick G Northup; Curtis K Argo; Mihir R Bakhru; Timothy M Schmitt; Carl L Berg; Mitchell H Rosner
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Gender, renal function, and outcomes on the liver transplant waiting list: assessment of revised MELD including estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Authors:  Robert P Myers; Abdel Aziz M Shaheen; Alexander I Aspinall; Robert R Quinn; Kelly W Burak
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 25.083

10.  Vascular invasion and histopathologic grading determine outcome after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.

Authors:  S Jonas; W O Bechstein; T Steinmüller; M Herrmann; C Radke; T Berg; U Settmacher; P Neuhaus
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.425

View more
  6 in total

1.  Factors predicting kidney delayed graft function among recipients of simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Islam M Korayem; Vatche G Agopian; Keri E Lunsford; Hans A Gritsch; Jeffrey L Veale; Gerald S Lipshutz; Hasan Yersiz; Coney L Serrone; Fady M Kaldas; Douglas G Farmer; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Gabriel M Danovitch; Ronald W Busuttil; Ali Zarrinpar
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.863

2.  Differential Simultaneous Liver and Kidney Transplant Benefit Based on Severity of Liver Damage at the Time of Transplantation.

Authors:  Shahid Habib; Khalid Khan; Chiu-Hsieh Hsu; Edward Meister; Abbas Rana; Thomas Boyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology Res       Date:  2017-04-19

3.  Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Patients on Renal Replacement Therapy: Considerations for Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation Versus Safety Net.

Authors:  Alejandro Pita; Navpreet Kaur; Juliet Emamaullee; Mary Lo; Brian Nguyen; Andrew Sabour; Vincent Tristan; Mitra Nadim; Yuri Genyk; Linda Sher
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2019-09-19

4.  Early detection of acute kidney injury in the perioperative period of liver transplant with neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin.

Authors:  Camila Lima; Luciana Bertocco de Paiva Haddad; Patrícia Donado Vaz de Melo; Luiz Marcelo Malbouisson; Lilian Pires Freitas do Carmo; Luiz Augusto Carneiro D'Albuquerque; Etienne Macedo
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.388

5.  Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation Alone for Patients on Maintenance Renal Replacement Therapy in Japan: Results of a Nationwide Survey.

Authors:  Susumu Eguchi; Hiroyuki Furukawa; Shinji Uemoto; Koji Umeshita; Hajime Imamura; Akihiko Soyama; Tsuyoshi Shimamura; Shuji Isaji; Yasuhiro Ogura; Hiroto Egawa; Shigeyuki Kawachi; Mureo Kasahara; Hiroaki Nagano; Yonson Ku; Hideki Ohdan; Yoshihiko Maehara; Shuntaro Sato; Yukihiro Inomata
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2016-05-02

Review 6.  Simultaneous Liver-Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Vichin Puri; James Eason
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2015-10-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.