INTRODUCTION: Existing data on perfusion imaging assumes the perihemorrhagic zone (PHZ) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to be size steady. This study investigates the size of the perihemorrhagic zone (PHZ) in patients with lobar ICH in relation to hematoma volume during the course of treatment using perfusion CT (PCT). METHODS: The present analysis is based on a previously reported cohort of 20 patients undergoing surgical evacuation for lobar SICH, with pre- and early postoperative PCT scanning. Time to peak of the residue function (T max) was measured based on the 360° cortical banding method and singular value decomposition. The size of PHZ was determined before and after treatment and correlated with hematoma volume. RESULTS: Preoperative mean hematoma volume constituted 63.0 ml (interquartile ranges (IQR) 39.7-99.4 ml), which correlated significantly (r=0.563, p=0.010) with mean PHZ size (5.67 cm, IQR 5.44-8.17 cm). Following a surgical hematoma evacuation, mean hematoma volume was reduced to 2.5 ml IQR 0.0-9.5 ml, which also resulted in a significant reduction of PHZ size to 0.45 cm(IQR 0.0-1.36 cm; p<0.001). There was no association between postoperative hematoma volume and size of the PHZ. CONCLUSION: Our findings illustrate that the extent of the PHZ cannot be generally assumed to be constant in size and that this differs significantly following hematoma reduction in patients with space occupying lobar SICH.
INTRODUCTION: Existing data on perfusion imaging assumes the perihemorrhagic zone (PHZ) in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) to be size steady. This study investigates the size of the perihemorrhagic zone (PHZ) in patients with lobar ICH in relation to hematoma volume during the course of treatment using perfusion CT (PCT). METHODS: The present analysis is based on a previously reported cohort of 20 patients undergoing surgical evacuation for lobar SICH, with pre- and early postoperative PCT scanning. Time to peak of the residue function (T max) was measured based on the 360° cortical banding method and singular value decomposition. The size of PHZ was determined before and after treatment and correlated with hematoma volume. RESULTS: Preoperative mean hematoma volume constituted 63.0 ml (interquartile ranges (IQR) 39.7-99.4 ml), which correlated significantly (r=0.563, p=0.010) with mean PHZ size (5.67 cm, IQR 5.44-8.17 cm). Following a surgical hematoma evacuation, mean hematoma volume was reduced to 2.5 ml IQR 0.0-9.5 ml, which also resulted in a significant reduction of PHZ size to 0.45 cm(IQR 0.0-1.36 cm; p<0.001). There was no association between postoperative hematoma volume and size of the PHZ. CONCLUSION: Our findings illustrate that the extent of the PHZ cannot be generally assumed to be constant in size and that this differs significantly following hematoma reduction in patients with space occupying lobar SICH.
Authors: H J Wittsack; A M Wohlschläger; E K Ritzl; R Kleiser; M Cohnen; R J Seitz; U Mödder Journal: Comput Med Imaging Graph Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.790
Authors: Jonathan Rosand; Clifford Eskey; Yuchiao Chang; R Gilberto Gonzalez; Steven M Greenberg; Walter J Koroshetz Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Ana M Pascual; Jose V López-Mut; Vicente Benlloch; Raquel Chamarro; Jose Soler; Miguel J A Láinez Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2006-09-12 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Charlotte Jj van Asch; Merel Ja Luitse; Gabriël Je Rinkel; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Ale Algra; Catharina Jm Klijn Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2010-01-05 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Christian Herweh; Eric Jüttler; Peter D Schellinger; Ernst Klotz; Ekkehart Jenetzky; Berk Orakcioglu; Klaus Sartor; Peter Schramm Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-09-27 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Craig S Anderson; Yining Huang; Hisatomi Arima; Emma Heeley; Christian Skulina; Mark W Parsons; Bin Peng; Qiang Li; Steve Su; Qing Ling Tao; Yue Chun Li; Jian Dong Jiang; Li Wen Tai; Jin Li Zhang; En Xu; Yan Cheng; Lewis B Morgenstern; John Chalmers; Ji Guang Wang Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-12-31 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Craig S Anderson; Yining Huang; Ji Guang Wang; Hisatomi Arima; Bruce Neal; Bin Peng; Emma Heeley; Christian Skulina; Mark W Parsons; Jong Sung Kim; Qing Ling Tao; Yue Chun Li; Jian Dong Jiang; Li Wen Tai; Jin Li Zhang; En Xu; Yan Cheng; Stephane Heritier; Lewis B Morgenstern; John Chalmers Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2008-04-07 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: J-M Olivot; M Mlynash; G Zaharchuk; M Straka; R Bammer; N Schwartz; M G Lansberg; M E Moseley; G W Albers Journal: Neurology Date: 2009-03-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Berk Orakcioglu; Modar M Kentar; Patrick Schiebel; Yoichi Uozumi; Andreas Unterberg; Oliver W Sakowitz Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 3.210