Michael G Gaies1, Howard E Jeffries, Robert A Niebler, Sara K Pasquali, Janet E Donohue, Sunkyung Yu, Christine Gall, Tom B Rice, Ravi R Thiagarajan. 1. 1Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Division of Cardiology, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI. 2Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium Data Coordinating Center, Michigan Congenital Heart Outcomes Research and Discovery Unit, Ann Arbor, MI. 3Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA. 4Department of Pediatrics, Section of Critical Care, Children's Hospital of Wisconsin, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI. 5Virtual PICU Systems (VPS, LLC), Los Angeles, CA. 6Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To empirically derive the optimal measure of pharmacologic cardiovascular support in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with bypass and to assess the association between this score and clinical outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort. DESIGN: Prospective, multi-institutional cohort study. SETTING: Cardiac ICUs at four academic children's hospitals participating in the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium during the study period. PATIENTS: Children younger than 1 year at the time of surgery treated postoperatively in the cardiac ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-one infants undergoing surgery with bypass were enrolled consecutively from November 2011 to April 2012. Hourly doses of all vasoactive agents were recorded for the first 48 hours after cardiac ICU admission. Multiple derivations of an inotropic score were tested, and maximum vasoactive-inotropic score in the first 24 hours was further analyzed for association with clinical outcomes. The primary composite "poor outcome" variable included at least one of mortality, mechanical circulatory support, cardiac arrest, renal replacement therapy, or neurologic injury. High vasoactive-inotropic score was empirically defined as more than or equal to 20. Multivariable logistic regression was performed controlling for center and patient characteristics. Patients with high vasoactive-inotropic score had significantly greater odds of a poor outcome (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.9-14.6), mortality (odds ratio, 13.2; 95% CI, 3.7-47.6), and prolonged time to first extubation and cardiac ICU length of stay compared with patients with low vasoactive-inotropic score. Stratified analyses by age (neonate vs infant) and surgical complexity (low vs high) showed similar associations with increased morbidity and mortality for patients with high vasoactive-inotropic score. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum vasoactive-inotropic score calculated in the first 24 hours after cardiac ICU admission was strongly and significantly associated with morbidity and mortality in this multi-institutional cohort of infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Maximum vasoactive-inotropic score more than or equal to 20 predicts an increased likelihood of a poor composite clinical outcome. The findings were consistent in stratified analyses by age and surgical complexity.
OBJECTIVE: To empirically derive the optimal measure of pharmacologic cardiovascular support in infants undergoing cardiac surgery with bypass and to assess the association between this score and clinical outcomes in a multi-institutional cohort. DESIGN: Prospective, multi-institutional cohort study. SETTING: Cardiac ICUs at four academic children's hospitals participating in the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium during the study period. PATIENTS: Children younger than 1 year at the time of surgery treated postoperatively in the cardiac ICU. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Three hundred ninety-one infants undergoing surgery with bypass were enrolled consecutively from November 2011 to April 2012. Hourly doses of all vasoactive agents were recorded for the first 48 hours after cardiac ICU admission. Multiple derivations of an inotropic score were tested, and maximum vasoactive-inotropic score in the first 24 hours was further analyzed for association with clinical outcomes. The primary composite "poor outcome" variable included at least one of mortality, mechanical circulatory support, cardiac arrest, renal replacement therapy, or neurologic injury. High vasoactive-inotropic score was empirically defined as more than or equal to 20. Multivariable logistic regression was performed controlling for center and patient characteristics. Patients with high vasoactive-inotropic score had significantly greater odds of a poor outcome (odds ratio, 6.5; 95% CI, 2.9-14.6), mortality (odds ratio, 13.2; 95% CI, 3.7-47.6), and prolonged time to first extubation and cardiac ICU length of stay compared with patients with low vasoactive-inotropic score. Stratified analyses by age (neonate vs infant) and surgical complexity (low vs high) showed similar associations with increased morbidity and mortality for patients with high vasoactive-inotropic score. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum vasoactive-inotropic score calculated in the first 24 hours after cardiac ICU admission was strongly and significantly associated with morbidity and mortality in this multi-institutional cohort of infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Maximum vasoactive-inotropic score more than or equal to 20 predicts an increased likelihood of a poor composite clinical outcome. The findings were consistent in stratified analyses by age and surgical complexity.
Authors: T J Kulik; F W Moler; J M Palmisano; J R Custer; R S Mosca; E L Bove; R H Bartlett Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-11-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: J F Rhodes; A D Blaufox; H S Seiden; J D Asnes; R P Gross; J P Rhodes; R B Griepp; A F Rossi Journal: Circulation Date: 1999-11-09 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G Wernovsky; D Wypij; R A Jonas; J E Mayer; F L Hanley; P R Hickey; A Z Walsh; A C Chang; A R Castañeda; J W Newburger; D L Wessel Journal: Circulation Date: 1995-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Eric M Graham; Andrew M Atz; Kimberly E McHugh; Ryan J Butts; Nathaniel L Baker; Robert E Stroud; Scott T Reeves; Scott M Bradley; Francis X McGowan; Francis G Spinale Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2013-07-16 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Zsolt L Nagy; Mike Collins; Tracy Sharpe; Saeed Mirsadraee; Rafael R Guerrero; John Gibbs; Kevin G Watterson Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-07-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: G T O'Connor; S K Plume; E M Olmstead; J R Morton; C T Maloney; W C Nugent; F Hernandez; R Clough; B J Leavitt; L H Coffin; C A Marrin; D Wennberg; J D Birkmeyer; D C Charlesworth; D J Malenka; H B Quinton; J F Kasper Journal: JAMA Date: 1996-03-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Colleen E Gruenwald; Brian W McCrindle; Lynn Crawford-Lean; Helen Holtby; Christopher Parshuram; Patricia Massicotte; Glen Van Arsdell Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Denise C Hasson; John T Brinton; Ellen Cowherd; Danielle E Soranno; Katja M Gist Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Margaret A Gray; Eric M Graham; Andrew M Atz; Scott M Bradley; Minoo N Kavarana; Shahryar M Chowdhury Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Nahmah Kim-Campbell; Catherine Gretchen; Vladimir B Ritov; Patrick M Kochanek; Goundappa K Balasubramani; Elizabeth Kenny; Mahesh Sharma; Melita Viegas; Clifton Callaway; Valerian E Kagan; Hülya Bayír Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Eric M Graham; Reneé H Martin; Jason R Buckley; Sinai C Zyblewski; Minoo N Kavarana; Scott M Bradley; Bahaaldin Alsoufi; William T Mahle; Marc Hassid; Andrew M Atz Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2019-08-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sarah Tabbutt; Jennifer Schuette; Wenying Zhang; Jeffrey Alten; Janet Donohue; J William Gaynor; Nancy Ghanayem; Jeffrey Jacobs; Sara K Pasquali; Ravi Thiagarajan; Justin B Dimick; Mousumi Banerjee; David Cooper; Michael Gaies Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Fran Balamuth; Scott L Weiss; Julie C Fitzgerald; Katie Hayes; Sierra Centkowski; Marianne Chilutti; Robert W Grundmeier; Jane Lavelle; Elizabeth R Alpern Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Michael Gaies; David S Cooper; Sarah Tabbutt; Steven M Schwartz; Nancy Ghanayem; Nikhil K Chanani; John M Costello; Ravi R Thiagarajan; Peter C Laussen; Lara S Shekerdemian; Janet E Donohue; Gina M Willis; J William Gaynor; Jeffrey P Jacobs; Richard G Ohye; John R Charpie; Sara K Pasquali; Mark A Scheurer Journal: Cardiol Young Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 1.093
Authors: Marissa A Brunetti; J William Gaynor; Lauren B Retzloff; Jessica L Lehrich; Mousumi Banerjee; Venugopal Amula; David Bailly; Darren Klugman; Josh Koch; Javier Lasa; Sara K Pasquali; Michael Gaies Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 3.624