Literature DB >> 24776558

Evidence-based medicine: The cleft lip nasal deformity.

Cathy Henry1, Thomas Samson, Donald Mackay.   

Abstract

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: (1) Describe the components of unilateral and bilateral secondary cleft lip nasal deformity. (2) Discuss current methods of assessing the deformity and outcomes. (3) Discuss primary treatment options including the use of preoperative orthopedics, nasal molding techniques, and the primary cleft rhinoplasty. (4) Design a treatment plan for cleft patients that will optimize the outcome of nasal appearance and function. (5) Discuss the evidence regarding outcomes of current practices, and describe areas where more research is needed.
SUMMARY: This is the third Maintenance of Certification article on the secondary cleft lip nose deformity. In the first article, Guyuron defined the deformities and described techniques for the definitive (adult) rhinoplasty. The second article, by Zbar and Canady, presented evidence regarding the assessment, surgical treatment, and outcomes from the literature published between 1999 and 2009. In this article, the authors summarize important points from the first two articles and then concentrate on the evidence for the following topics: (1) methods currently used in evaluating the severity of the deformities; (2) methods used in evaluating outcomes of different treatments; (3) benefits of rhinoplasty performed at the time of the lip repair and evidence for the effect of rhinoplasties performed after infancy but before maturity; (4) presurgical orthopedics and nasoalveolar molding; (5) common surgical techniques used in primary cleft rhinoplasties; and (6) impact of the nasal deformity on quality of life. Overall, there is little high-level evidence regarding the outcomes of cleft nasal deformity treatment, leaving much room for future study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24776558     DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  6 in total

1.  Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Niels Christian Pausch; Carolin Unger; Poramate Pitak-Arnnop; Keskanya Subbalekha
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-04-22

Review 2.  Correlation between Nasoalveolar Molding and Surgical, Aesthetic, Functional and Socioeconomic Outcomes Following Primary Repair Surgery: a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sophie Maillard; Jean-Marc Retrouvey; Mairaj K Ahmed; Peter J Taub
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2017-09-30

3.  The effects of Y-shaped conchal cartilage transplantation on the correction of nasal deformity secondary to cleft lip and its influence on mental health.

Authors:  Ling Liu; Wei Wang; Lin Yang; Hongchuang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Validation of a Unilateral Cleft Lip Surgical Outcomes Evaluation Scale for Surgeons and Laypersons.

Authors:  Alex Campbell; Carolina Restrepo; Gaurav Deshpande; Caroline Tredway; Sarah M Bernstein; Rachel Patzer; Lisa Wendby; Bjorn Schonmeyr
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2017-09-13

5.  Preoperative analysis of upper lip in patients with upper cleft lip/palate before lip repair.

Authors:  Junyan Jing; Xiaoxuan Chen; Bing Shi; Yufeng Wang; Yongbin Mou; Yong Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04

6.  Description of total population hospital admissions for cleft lip and/or palate in Australia.

Authors:  Jonathan Y J Lo; Nicky Kilpatrick; Peter Jacoby; Linda M Slack-Smith
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.