Literature DB >> 24776225

Modeling situation awareness and crash risk.

Donald L Fisher1, David L Strayer2.   

Abstract

In this article we develop a model of the relationship between crash risk and a driver's situation awareness. We consider a driver's situation awareness to reflect the dynamic mental model of the driving environment and to be dependent upon several psychological processes including Scanning the driving environment, Predicting and anticipating hazards, Identifying potential hazards in the driving scene as they occur, Deciding on an action, and Executing an appropriate Response (SPIDER). Together, SPIDER is important for establishing and maintaining good situation awareness of the driving environment and good situation awareness is important for coordinating and scheduling the SPIDER-relevant processes necessary for safe driving. An Order-of-Processing (OP) model makes explicit the SPIDER-relevant processes and how they predict the likelihood of a crash when the driver is or is not distracted by a secondary task. For example, the OP model shows how a small decrease in the likelihood of any particular SPIDER activity being completed successfully (because of a concurrent secondary task performance) would lead to a large increase in the relative risk of a crash.

Year:  2014        PMID: 24776225      PMCID: PMC4001668     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med        ISSN: 1943-2461


  10 in total

1.  Effects of verbal and spatial-imagery tasks on eye fixations while driving.

Authors:  M A Recarte; L M Nunes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2000-03

2.  Cell phone-induced failures of visual attention during simulated driving.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Frank A Drews; William A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2003-03

3.  Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques.

Authors:  William J Horrey; Christopher D Wickens
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Passenger and cell phone conversations in simulated driving.

Authors:  Frank A Drews; Monisha Pasupathi; David L Strayer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2008-12

5.  How dangerous is looking away from the road? Algorithms predict crash risk from glance patterns in naturalistic driving.

Authors:  Yulan Liang; John D Lee; Lora Yekhshatyan
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.888

Review 6.  The view from the road: the contribution of on-road glance-monitoring technologies to understanding driver behavior.

Authors:  T Taylor; A K Pradhan; G Divekar; M Romoser; J Muttart; R Gomez; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2013-02-27

7.  Modeling drivers' visual attention allocation while interacting with in-vehicle technologies.

Authors:  William J Horrey; Christopher D Wickens; Kyle P Consalus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2006-06

8.  Towards an understanding of driver inattention: taxonomy and theory.

Authors:  Michael A Regan; David L Strayer
Journal:  Ann Adv Automot Med       Date:  2014

9.  An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability.

Authors:  Joel M Cooper; Ivana Vladisavljevic; Nathan Medeiros-Ward; Peter T Martin; David L Strayer
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload.

Authors:  Yi-Fang Tsai; Erik Viirre; Christopher Strychacz; Bradley Chase; Tzyy-Ping Jung
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  2007-05
  10 in total
  1 in total

1.  Talking to your car can drive you to distraction.

Authors:  David L Strayer; Joel M Cooper; Jonna Turrill; James R Coleman; Rachel J Hopman
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2016-11-14
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.