| Literature DB >> 24774506 |
Chinyere V Ezeaka, Rosemary O Ugwu, Mariya Mukhtar-Yola, Ekanem N Ekure, Bolajoko O Olusanya1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nigeria is frequently associated with disproportionately high rates of severe neonatal jaundice (NNJ) underpinned by widespread Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency. Timely and appropriate treatment of NNJ is crucial for preventing the associated morbidity and neuro-developmental sequelae. Since mothers are likely to be the first mostly to observe the onset of severe illness in their newborns, we set out to identify the pattern and predictors of maternal care-seeking practices for NNJ in three culturally-distinct settings in Nigeria.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24774506 PMCID: PMC4032169 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-192
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res ISSN: 1472-6963 Impact factor: 2.655
Figure 1Proportion of respondents (n = 488) with or without prior knowledge of neonatal jaundice across the survey centres.
Characteristics of pregnant mothers enrolled for study at three centres (n = 431)
| Maternal age (Years) | | | | |
| < 20 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 (0.5) |
| 20 – 35 | 85 | 100 | 199 | 384 (89.1) |
| >35 | 0 | 14 | 11 | 25 (5.8) |
| Unknown | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 (4.6) |
| Marital status | | | | |
| Single | 5 | 3 | 10 | 18 (4.1) |
| Married | 77 | 133 | 198 | 408 (94.7) |
| Separated/Widow | 3 | 0 | 2 | 5 (1.2) |
| Parity | | | | |
| 0 | 3 | 58 | 24 | 85 (19.7) |
| 1 | 28 | 39 | 56 | 123 (28.5) |
| 2 or more | 54 | 39 | 130 | 223 (51.7) |
| Ethnicity | | | | |
| Hausa | 20 | 17 | 19 | 56 (13.0) |
| Ibo | 25 | 42 | 58 | 125 (29.0) |
| Yoruba | 15 | 57 | 12 | 84 (19.5) |
| Others | 25 | 20 | 121 | 166 (38.5) |
| Religion | | | | |
| Christianity | 76 | 111 | 204 | 391 (90.7) |
| Islam | 9 | 25 | 6 | 40 (9.3) |
| Education | | | | |
| Primary | 5 | 4 | 9 | 18 (4.2) |
| Secondary | 24 | 21 | 62 | 107 (24.9) |
| Technical | 10 | 9 | 24 | 43 (10.0) |
| Tertiary | 46 | 102 | 115 | 263 (61.0) |
| Education of spouse | | | | |
| Primary | 1 | 3 | 4 | 8 (1.9) |
| Secondary | 13 | 32 | 44 | 89 (20.6) |
| Technical | 10 | 5 | 17 | 32 (7.4) |
| Tertiary | 61 | 96 | 145 | 302 (70.1) |
| Occupation | | | | |
| None | 9 | 12 | 46 | 67 (15.5) |
| Student | 1 | 12 | 20 | 33 (7.7) |
| Self-employed | 37 | 41 | 74 | 152 (35.3) |
| Formal Job | 32 | 56 | 65 | 153 (35.5) |
| Unknown | 6 | 15 | 5 | 26 (6.0) |
| Residential type | | | | |
| Self-contained | 60 | 110 | 168 | 338 (78.4) |
| Shared | 15 | 26 | 40 | 81 (18.8) |
| Unknown | 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 (27.8) |
| Home ownership status | | | | |
| Owned | 26 | 20 | 62 | 108 (25.0) |
| Rented | 49 | 116 | 146 | 311 (72.2) |
| Unknown | 10 | 0 | 2 | 12 (27.8) |
Knowledge of NNJ among mothers attending routine prenatal clinics in Nigeria (n = 431)
| Heard about jaundice from | | | | |
| Friend/Neighbour | 15 (17.6) | 37 (27.2) | 46 (21.9) | 98 (22.7) |
| Health worker | 57 (67.1) | 61 (44.9) | 131 (62.4) | 249 (57.8) |
| Relations | 5 (5.9) | 16 (11.8) | 12 (5.7) | 33 (7.7) |
| Media | 1 (1.2) | 5 (3.7) | 7 (3.3) | 13 (3.0) |
| Other | 7 (8.2) | 17 (12.5) | 14 (6.7) | 38 (8.8) |
| Can recognise baby with jaundice | | | | |
| No | 17 (20.0) | 47 (34.6) | 58 (27.6) | 122 (28.3) |
| Yes | 68 (80.0) | 89 (65.4) | 152 (72.4) | 309 (71.7) |
| Where to look for in the baby | | | | |
| Eye, body or skin | 68 (80.0) | 89 (65.4) | 152 (72.4) | 309 (71.7) |
| Not stated | 17 (20.0) | 47 (34.6) | 58 (27.6) | 122 (28.3) |
| What would be seen in baby | | | | |
| Yellowish discolouration | 53 (62.4) | 75 (55.1) | 142 (67.6) | 270 (62.6) |
| Other | 13 (15.3) | 11 (8.1) | 10 (4.8) | 34 (7.9) |
| Not stated | 19 (22.4) | 50 (36.8) | 58 (27.6) | 127 (29.5) |
| Possible effects of severe jaundice in a baby | | | | |
| Poor feeding | 8 (9.4) | 28 (20.6) | 58 (27.6) | 94 (21.8) |
| Irritable | 4 (4.7) | 12 (8.8) | 11 (5.2) | 27 (6.3) |
| Abnormal cry | 15 (17.6) | 12 (8.8) | 22 (10.5) | 49 (11.4) |
| Abnormal body stretching | 6 (7.1) | 12 (8.8) | 12 (5.7) | 30 (7.0) |
| Abnormal eye movement | 9 (10.6) | 15 (11.0) | 16 (7.6) | 40 (9.3) |
| Other | 7 (8.2) | 2 (1.5) | 6 (2.9) | 15 (3.5) |
| Not stated | 36 (42.4) | 55 (40.4) | 85 (40.5) | 176 (40.7) |
| Possible dangers of jaundice | | | | |
| Death | 22 (25.9) | 71 (52.2) | 65 (31.0) | 158 (36.6) |
| Disability | 30 (35.3) | 21 (15.4) | 49 (23.3) | 100 (23.2) |
| Death/Disability | 7 (8.2) | 13 (9.6) | 36 (17.1) | 56 (13.0) |
| Other | 3 (3.5) | 3 (2.2) | 9 (4.3) | 15 (3.5) |
| Not stated | 23 (27.1) | 28 (20.6) | 51 (24.3) | 102 (23.7) |
| Possible causes of jaundice | | | | |
| Infections | 15 (17.6) | 2 (1.5) | 9 (4.3) | 26 (6.0) |
| Malaria/Fever | 23 (27.1) | 31 (22.8) | 74 (35.2) | 128 (29.7) |
| Prematurity | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 6 (2.9) | 6 (1.4) |
| ABO/Rhesus incompatibility | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 2 (1.0) | 3 (0.7) |
| Others | 18 (21.2) | 11 (8.8) | 27 (12.9) | 56 (13.0) |
| Not stated | 29 (34.1) | 91 (66.9) | 92 (43.8) | 212 (49.2) |
| Planned place of delivery | | | | |
| Same hospital | 51 (60.0) | 113 (83.1) | 158 (75.2) | 322 (74.7) |
| Other public hospital | 20 (23.5) | 20 (14.7) | 27 (12.9) | 67 (15.5) |
| Private hospital | 14 (16.5) | 3 (2.2) | 21 (10.0) | 38 (8.8) |
| Outside hospital | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 4 (1.9) | 4 (0.9) |
| Possible use of haemolytic substances | | | | |
| Dusting powder | 23 (27.1) | 47 (34.6) | 62 (29.5) | 132 (30.6) |
| Robb mentholated cream | 17 (20.0) | 9 (6.6) | 13 (6.2) | 39 (9.0) |
| Eucalyptus oil | 10 (11.8) | 28 (20.6) | 15 (7.1) | 53 (12.3) |
| Camphor on clothes | 0 (0.0) | 5 (3.7) | 12 (5.7) | 17 (3.9) |
| Not stated | 35 (41.2) | 47 (34.6) | 108 (51.4) | 190 (44.1) |
Experience and planned action by mothers on infants with jaundice (n = 431)
| Ever had baby with jaundice | | | | |
| No | 56 (65.9) | 107 (78.7) | 140 (66.7) | 303 (70.3) |
| Yes | 29 (34.1) | 29 (21.3) | 70 (33.3) | 128 (29.7) |
| Who first detected the baby with jaundice | | | | |
| Self | 12 (14.1) | 6 (4.4) | 22 (10.5) | 40 (9.3) |
| Relation/Neighbour | 3 (3.5) | 9 (6.6) | 18 (8.6) | 30 (7.0) |
| Doctor/Nurse | 14 (16.5) | 13 (9.6) | 30 (14.3) | 57 (13.2) |
| Not stated | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.2) |
| Not applicable | 56 (65.9) | 107 (78.7) | 140 (66.7) | 303 (70.3) |
| Action taken/treatment | | | | |
| Hospital admission | 23 (27.1) | 17 (12.5) | 15 (14.3) | 70 (16.2) |
| Sunlight exposure | 5 (5.9) | 5 (3.7) | 28 (13.3) | 38 (8.8) |
| Antibiotics | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.7) | 3 (0.7) |
| Breast feeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) |
| Pawpaw | 1 (1.2) | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.2) |
| Not stated | 0 (0.0) | 6 (4.4) | 8 (3.8) | 14 (3.2) |
| Not applicable | 56 (65.9) | 107 (78.7) | 140 (66.7) | 303 (70.3) |
| Final outcome | | | | |
| Baby died | 1 (1.2) | 1 (0.7) | 7 (3.3) | 9 (2.1) |
| Baby recovered fully | 28 (32.9) | 23 (16.9) | 63 (30.0) | 114 (26.5) |
| Baby survived with problems | 0 (0.0) | 3 (2.2) | 0 (0.0) | 3 (0.7) |
| Not stated | 0 (0.0) | 2 (1.5) | 0 (0.0) | 2 (0.5) |
| Not applicable | 56 (65.9) | 107 (78.7) | 140 (66.7) | 303 (70.3) |
| Possible future action | | | | |
| Go to hospital | 67 (78.8) | 91 (66.9) | 145 (69.0) | 303 (70.3) |
| Sunlight exposure | 11 (12.9) | 1 (0.7) | 39 (18.6) | 51 (11.8) |
| Antibiotics | 2 (2.4) | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | 3 (0.7) |
| Exclusive breastfeeding | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.7) | 1 (0.5) | 2 (0.5) |
| Not stated | 5 (5.9) | 43 (31.6) | 24 (11.4) | 72 (16.7) |
Logistic regression models predicting prior knowledge of NNJ, accurate recognition of NNJ, self-treatment and planned future hospital visit for NNJ treatment
| Parity | | | | |
| 0 | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| 1 | 1.76 (0.78-3.96) | 1.48 (0.80-2.76) | 1.58 (0.85-2.96) | 1.86 (0.98-3.55) |
| 2 or more | 4.05 (1.75-9.36)*** | 2.38 (1.27-4.46)** | 1.64 (0.89-3.03) | 1.63 (0.87-3.04) |
| Ethnicity | | | | |
| Hausa | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Ibo | 1.11 (0.42-2.97) | 0.94 (0.42-2.10) | 0.91(0.45-1.83) | 1.07 (0.50-2.29) |
| Yoruba | 1.44 (0.49-4.25) | 0.55 (0.24-1.24) | 1.47 (0.68-3.16) | 1.13 (0.50-2.58) |
| Others | 1.49 (0.56-3.98) | 0.75 (0.34-1.63) | 0.81 (0.41-1.62) | 0.90 (0.43-1.91) |
| Religion | | | | |
| Christianity | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Islam | 0.69 (0.23-2.07) | 1.68 (0.72-3.90) | 1.08 (0.49-2.35) | 2.04 (0.83-5.01) |
| Education | | | | |
| Non-tertiary | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Tertiary | 1.91 (1.01-3.61)* | 1.92 (1.21-3.05)** | 0.78 (0.51-1.21) | 1.20 (0.74-1.92) |
| Residential type | | | | |
| Self-contained | Reference | Not Applicable | Reference | Reference |
| Shared | 0.71 (0.35-1.41) | | 1.29 (0.76-2.19) | 0.70 (0.41-1.22) |
| Location | | | | |
| Abuja | Reference | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Lagos | 2.96 (1.10-7.97)* | 0.60 (0.30-1.23) | 1.33 (0.70-2.54) | 0.67 (0.33-1.40) |
| Port Harcourt | 1.15 (0.53-2.48) | 0.70 (0.37-1.34) | 0.74 (0.43-1.30) | 0.70 (0.36-1.35) |
| Source of information | | | | |
| Non health worker | Not applicable | Reference | Reference | Reference |
| Health worker | 1.09 (0.69-1.73) | 0.60 (0.39-0.92)* | 1.88 (1.20-2.95)** | |
| Hosmer-Lemeshow Test | p = 0.235 | p = 0.395 | p = 0.769 | p = 0.552 |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 001; AOR = adjusted odds ratio; CI = confidence interval.
Model 1: Factors predicting women who are most likely to have previously heard about neonatal jaundice.
Model 2: Factors predicting ability to recognise the possible occurrence of NNJ.
Model 3: Factors predicting self-treatment with potentially harmful substances.
Model 4: Factors predicting women who are likely to seek or advise hospital care for an infant with NNJ.