Literature DB >> 24774476

Survey to investigate pet ownership and attitudes to pet care in metropolitan Chicago dog and/or cat owners.

Amber Freiwald1, Annette Litster2, Hsin-Yi Weng3.   

Abstract

The aims of this descriptive cross-sectional study were to investigate dog and cat acquisition and attitudes toward pet care among residents of the Chicago area (zip codes 60600-60660); to compare data obtained from owners of shelter-acquired pets with those of residents who acquired their pets from other sources; to compare data from dog owners with cat owners; and to compare pet health practices among the respondents of different zip code income groups. In-person surveys administered at five pet store locations collected data from 529 respondents, representing 582 dogs and 402 cats owned or continuously cared for in the past 3 years. Median household income data for represented zip codes was also obtained. Shelters were the most common source of cats (p<0.01) and were the second most common source of dogs. Cats were more likely to have been acquired as strays, while dogs were more likely to have been acquired from friends/family/neighbors, pet stores, breeders or rescue organizations and to be kept as outdoor-only pets (p<0.01). More cats were kept per household than dogs (dogs mean=1.32/household; cats mean=1.78/household; p<0.01). Pet owners were most commonly 'very likely' (5 on a 1-5/5 Likert scale) to administer all hypothetical treatments discussed, although cat owners were less likely to spend time training their pet (p=0.05). Cat owners were less likely to have taken their pet to a veterinarian for vaccinations or annual physical exams (p<0.01). Shelter-acquired cats were significantly more likely to have been taken by their owners to the veterinarian for annual exams (p=0.05) than cats obtained as strays. Owners of shelter-acquired pets were at least as willing as other respondents to administer hypothetical treatments and pay ≥$1000 for veterinary treatment. Respondents from site #3 lived in zip codes that had relatively lower median household incomes (p<0.01) and were less likely to spend ≥$1000 on their pets than those at the four other sites (p<0.01). Over 90% of pet owners from all acquisition categories expressed very high levels of attachment (≥8-10/10 on a Likert scale), except for owners of cats acquired as strays (84.9%) or from the 'other' category (75.0%). Survey respondents commonly acquired their pets from shelters and those who did were at least as willing to pay for and provide veterinary care as respondents who owned pets acquired from other sources. The data collected provides a snapshot of the attitudes of survey respondents in the Chicago area toward pet acquisition and care.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal shelter; Epidemiology; Pet care; Pet ownership

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24774476     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.03.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  13 in total

1.  Work-related injuries to animal care workers, Washington 2007-2011.

Authors:  Heather Fowler; Darrin Adams; David Bonauto; Peter Rabinowitz
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Highly Educated Men Establish Strong Emotional Links with Their Dogs: A Study with Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale (MDORS) in Committed Spanish Dog Owners.

Authors:  Paula Calvo; Jonathan Bowen; Antoni Bulbena; Adolf Tobeña; Jaume Fatjó
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Exploring Social Desirability Bias in Perceptions of Dog Adoption: All's Well that Ends Well? Or Does the Method of Adoption Matter?

Authors:  Courtney Bir; Nicole Olynk Widmar; Candace Croney
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Evaluation of the factor structure of the Canine Behavioural Assessment and Research Questionnaire (C-BARQ) in European Portuguese.

Authors:  Rute Canejo-Teixeira; Pedro Armelim Almiro; James A Serpell; Luís V Baptista; Maria M R E Niza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Risk of Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) Infection in Pet Cats in Australia is Higher in Areas of Lower Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Vivian Tran; Mark Kelman; Michael Ward; Mark Westman
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Socioeconomic, geographic and climatic risk factors for canine parvovirus infection and euthanasia in Australia.

Authors:  Mark Kelman; Vanessa R Barrs; Jacqueline M Norris; Michael P Ward
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 2.670

7.  Demography and determinants of dog and cat ownership in three towns of West Shoa zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Endrias Zewdu Gebremedhin; Edilu Jorga Sarba; Abraham Mekebib Getaneh; Getachew Kebebew Tola; Solomon Shiferaw Endale; Lencho Megersa Marami
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2020-12-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Pet Attachment and Wellbeing of Older-Aged Recreational Horseback Riders.

Authors:  Gabriele Schwarzmueller-Erber; Manfred Maier; Michael Kundi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Socioeconomic Influences on Reports of Canine Welfare Concerns to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA) in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Hao Yu Shih; Mandy B A Paterson; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 2.752

10.  Nature Relatedness of Recreational Horseback Riders and Its Association with Mood and Wellbeing.

Authors:  Gabriele Schwarzmüller-Erber; Harald Stummer; Manfred Maier; Michael Kundi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.