Literature DB >> 24773330

Assessing the chiral switch: approval and use of single-enantiomer drugs, 2001 to 2011.

Walid F Gellad1, Phillip Choi, Margaret Mizah, Chester B Good, Aaron S Kesselheim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A "chiral switch" occurs in the pharmaceutical market when a drug made up of 2 enantiomer forms is replaced with a purified single-enantiomer version, often in the context of a patent expiration. We studied the prevalence of chiral switching in the United States over the past decade, including trends in use of, and expenditures on, these products in Medicaid. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis.
METHODS: We used US Adopted Names prefixes (lev/levo/ar/es/dex/dextro) to identify all single-enantiomer drugs approved from 2001 to 2011. From publicly available US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval documents, we extracted the characteristics of the pivotal premarket trials for the single enantiomers. Specifically, we evaluated whether the single enantiomer was directly compared with the precursor racemic drug and whether there was evidence of superior efficacy. We used quarterly drug expenditure data from each state Medicaid program to chart trends in use of, and spending on, the single-enantiomer products and their racemic precursors during the study period.
RESULTS: From 2001 to 2011, the FDA approved 9 single-enantiomer products: dexlansoprazole, levoleucovorin, levocetirizine, armodafinil, arformoterol, eszopiclone, escitalopram, dexmethylphenidate, and esomeprazole. Of those 9 drugs, 3 had at least 1 pre-approval randomized trial that included the racemic precursor as a direct comparator, but there was no evidence of superiority of the single enantiomer over the racemic at comparable doses. Between 2001 and 2011, US Medicaid programs spent approximately $6.3 billion on these 9 single-enantiomer drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: Recently approved single-enantiomer drugs showed no evidence of superior efficacy over the older racemic precursors in the pivotal trials leading to their approval, and in a majority of cases, they were not directly compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24773330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  10 in total

1.  Identifying potential prescription drug product hopping.

Authors:  Vrushab Gowda; Reed F Beall; Aaron S Kesselheim; Ameet Sarpatwari
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Long-Acting β2-Agonists in Asthma: Enantioselective Safety Studies are Needed.

Authors:  Glenn A Jacobson; Sharanne Raidal; Morten Hostrup; Luigino Calzetta; Richard Wood-Baker; Mark O Farber; Clive P Page; E Haydn Walters
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  3-(((1S,3S)-3-((R)-Hydroxy(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)methyl)-4-oxocyclohexyl)methyl)pentane-2,4-dione: Design and Synthesis of New Stereopure Multi-Target Antidiabetic Agent.

Authors:  Abdul Sadiq; Mater H Mahnashi; Umer Rashid; Muhammad Saeed Jan; Mohammed Abdulrahman Alshahrani; Mohammed A Huneif
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Approvals and Timing of New Formulations of Novel Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 1995 and 2010 and Followed Through 2021.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Christopher J Morten; Angela Y Zhu; Reshma Ramachandran; Nilay D Shah; Joseph S Ross
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2022-05-20

5.  Evaluation of Trials Comparing Single-Enantiomer Drugs to Their Racemic Precursors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aaron S Long; Audrey D Zhang; Caitlin E Meyer; Alexander C Egilman; Joseph S Ross; Joshua D Wallach
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  High adherence to the 'Wise List' treatment recommendations in Stockholm: a 15-year retrospective review of a multifaceted approach promoting rational use of medicines.

Authors:  Jaran Eriksen; Lars L Gustafsson; Kristina Ateva; Pia Bastholm-Rahmner; Marie-Louise Ovesjö; Malena Jirlow; Maria Juhasz-Haverinen; Gerd Lärfars; Rickard E Malmström; Björn Wettermark; Eva Andersén-Karlsson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-02       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Chiral Switch: Between Therapeutical Benefit and Marketing Strategy.

Authors:  Gabriel Hancu; Adriana Modroiu
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-17

8.  Comparative efficacy of esomeprazole and omeprazole: Racemate to single enantiomer switch.

Authors:  Waheed Asghar; Elliot Pittman; Fakhreddin Jamali
Journal:  Daru       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Chirality of Modern Antidepressants: An Overview.

Authors:  Monica Budău; Gabriel Hancu; Aura Rusu; Melania Cârcu-Dobrin; Daniela Lucia Muntean
Journal:  Adv Pharm Bull       Date:  2017-12-31

10.  Synthesis and Enantioselective Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Analysis of New CNS-Active Sulfamoylphenyl Carbamate Derivatives.

Authors:  Reem Odi; David Bibi; Bella Shusterman; Natalia Erenburg; Chanan Shaul; Claudiu T Supuran; Alessio Nocentini; Meir Bialer
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.