Literature DB >> 24773146

Evaluation of fear of radiation and isolation before and after radioiodine therapy.

Friederike von Müller1, Christian Happel, Jörg Reinhardt, Wolfgang Tilman Kranert, Benjamin Bockisch, Daniel Gröner, Hanns Ackermann, Frank Grünwald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prior to undergoing radioiodine therapy (RIT), patients regularly have concerns about isolation on the ward (mandatory for RIT for at least 48 hours in Germany due to radiation protection legislation) as well as fear of the presence of radioactive substances. In this study, these fears were investigated before and after RIT.
METHODS: A questionnaire was developed for completion both before and after radioiodine therapy. Questions included: (i) "Are you afraid of a therapy with radioactive substances?" (ii) "Do you have reservations about contact with radioactive substances?" and (iii) "Are you anxious about isolation?" Possible answers were made in a qualitative representation using a scale of 1-4 (4=full agreement, 3=mostly agreement, 2=partial agreement, and 1=no agreement). Further questions included, for example, sources of information used prior to therapy. A total of 209 patients treated by single or preplanned multiple RIT were surveyed over a period of 8 months (return 109). Analysis was done in subgroups according to age, education, disease, and number of RITs.
RESULTS: Question 1, "Are you afraid of a therapy with radioactive substances?" showed a similar statistically relevant decline in each subgroup (p<0.05), except for patients with multiple RIT (p=0.81). Asked about the handling of radioactive substances and their perception about the safety in this regard, the entire collective showed a highly statistically significant (p<0.01) decrease with little variability between the groups. The question concerning fear of isolation resulted in a significant decrease (p<0.05) in all subgroups, except for patients with multiple RIT (p=0.13). Analysis of sources of information before RIT showed that older patients preferred printed material and rarely used online resources, while younger patients used the internet more frequently, in addition to printed materials. Finally, most patients would undergo radioiodine therapy again (medical indication provided), with 54% fully agreeing and only 4% not agreeing.
CONCLUSIONS: The survey demonstrates a reduction in concerns about nuclear radiation, use of unsealed radioactive materials, and isolation on the ward after RIT. Surprisingly, concerns rise again before a subsequent therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24773146     DOI: 10.1089/thy.2013.0461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thyroid        ISSN: 1050-7256            Impact factor:   6.568


  4 in total

1.  Thermal ablation of thyroid nodules: are radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound equally safe and effective methods?

Authors:  Yücel Korkusuz; Daniel Gröner; Natascha Raczynski; Oleg Relin; Yasmina Kingeter; Frank Grünwald; Christian Happel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  12-month efficacy of a single radiofrequency ablation on autonomously functioning thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Stella Bernardi; Fulvio Stacul; Andrea Michelli; Fabiola Giudici; Giulia Zuolo; Nicolò de Manzini; Chiara Dobrinja; Fabrizio Zanconati; Bruno Fabris
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  Psychological impact of 131I radioprotection measures on thyroid cancer patients.

Authors:  Elena Barbus; Claudiu Pestean; Maria Iulia Larg; Katalin Gabora; Eduard-Alexandru Bonci; Claudiu Badulescu; Andra Piciu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2018-10-30

4.  Volume reduction of benign thyroid nodules 3 months after a single treatment with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

Authors:  Huedayi Korkusuz; Niklas Fehre; Michael Sennert; Christian Happel; Frank Grünwald
Journal:  J Ther Ultrasound       Date:  2015-03-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.