| Literature DB >> 24772420 |
Raquel Frenedoso da Silva1, Gabriela Missassi1, Cibele dos Santos Borges1, Eloísa Silva de Paula2, Maria Fernanda Hornos Carneiro2, Denise Grotto2, Fernando Barbosa Junior2, Wilma De Grava Kempinas1.
Abstract
Methylmercury, organic form of mercury, can increase the number of abnormal sperm and decrease sperm concentration and testosterone levels possibly due to the damage caused by reactive species to germ and Leydig cells. Maná-cubiu (Solanum sessiliflorum Dunal) is a native fruit from Amazon rich in iron, zinc, niacin, pectin, and citric acid, used in foods, beverages, and medicinal purposes, since it has been useful for treatment of various diseases caused by oxidative stress or nutritional deficiency. Therefore, this study evaluated the phytoremediation potential of this fruit on damages caused by exposure to MeHg on sperm quantity and quality and the histological aspect of the testis and epididymis. Wistar male rats (n = 20) were randomly allocated into four groups: Control group (received distilled water), MeHg group (140 μg/Kg), Solanum group (1% of fruit Maná-cubiu on chow), and Solanum plus MeHg group (same treatment as MeHg and Solanum group). The organs were weighted, histopathology; sperm morphology and counts were obtained. The results showed reduction in body weight gain, testis weights, reduced sperm production, and increased histopathological abnormalities in the MeHg-treated group. However, treatment with Solanum plus MeHg revealed a protective effect of this fruit on damages caused by MeHg.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24772420 PMCID: PMC3977497 DOI: 10.1155/2014/309631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1GSH quantification of control and treated animals. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test was performed. a, bMean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Figure 2Weight gain of control and treated animals. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test was performed. a, bMean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; P values <0.05 were considered significant.
Body weight and reproductive organ weights of male rats.
| Parameters | Control ( | MeHg ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absolute weights | ||||
| Final body weight (g) | 597.0 ± 5.7a | 533.5 ± 13.9b | 508.3 ± 10.0b | 550.3 ± 18.3a,b |
| Testis (mg) | 2,613 ± 87.02a | 1,955 ± 15.23b | 2,358 ± 86.92a,b | 2,224 ± 33.83a,b |
| Epididymis (mg) | 885.9 ± 30.2 | 755.5 ± 65.0 | 795.1 ± 35.8 | 779.3 ± 35.9 |
| Ventral prostate (mg) | 453.2 ± 35.4 | 434.7 ± 41.5 | 429.1 ± 55.0 | 542.3 ± 63.9 |
| Full seminal vesicle (mg) | 1,619 ± 182.3 | 1,592 ± 150.9 | 1,440 ± 66.7 | 1,500 ± 90.9 |
| Empty seminal vesicle (mg) | 630.9 ± 41.1 | 628.7 ± 71.7 | 586.5 ± 27.2 | 574.6 ± 32.8 |
| Relative weights | ||||
| Testis (mg/100 g) | 4.36 ± 0.14a,b | 3.63 ± 0.20a | 4.64 ± 1.74b | 4.05 ± 2.42a,b |
| Epididymis (mg/100 g) | 1.48 ± 0.04 | 1.40 ± 0.08 | 1.57 ± 0.09 | 1.42 ± 0.05 |
| Ventral prostate (mg/100 g) | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.84 ± 0.10 | 0.98 ± 0.05 |
| Full seminal vesicle (mg/100 g) | 2.69 ± 0.28 | 2.94 ± 0.20 | 2.85 ± 0.18 | 2.72 ± 0.14 |
| Empty seminal vesicle (mg/100 g) | 1.05 ± 0.06 | 1.16 ± 0.10 | 1.16 ± 0.07 | 1.04 ± 0.05 |
Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test was performed. a,bMean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Sperm morphology of control and treated animals.
| Parameters | Control | MeHg |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal sperm | 92.00 (91.50–93.38)a | 75.00 (66.38–82.13)b | 92.50 (86.63–94.38)a | 89.75 (84.50–95.00)a,b |
| Abnormalities of the sperm head | 6.00 (5.00–7.25)a | 19.75 (12.75–31.13)b | 6.50 (5.12–11.13)a,b | 9.25 (2.37–13.00)a,b |
| Abnormalities of the flagellum | 1.75 (0.37–2.12)a,b | 4.00 (2.37–6.50)a | 1.00 (0.50–1.75)b | 2.00 (0.37–6.50)a,b |
| Presence of cytoplasmic droplet | 15.00 (9.87–15.75) | 19.00 (14.38–24.13) | 23.00 (21.75–28.63) | 34.00 (23.38–37.00) |
N = 6/group. Values expressed as median and interquartile range (first and third). Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Dunn's test was performed. a,bMedians with the same letter do not differ statistically; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Sperm counts and transit time of male rats from control and treated groups.
| Parameters | Control | MeHg |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sperm head count (×106/testis) | 288.40 ± 8.72a | 208.00 ± 24.11b | 289.20 ± 12.08a | 267.90 ± 18.83a,b |
| Sperm head count (×106/g testis) | 117.50 ± 4.59 | 112.00 ± 9.55 | 124.20 ± 9.22 | 121.4 ± 7.13 |
| Daily sperm production (×106/testis) | 47.27 ± 1.43a | 34.09 ± 3.95b | 47.40 ± 1.98a | 43.92 ± 3.09a,b |
| Daily sperm production (×106/g testis) | 19.26 ± 0.75 | 18.35 ± 1.56 | 20.35 ± 1.51 | 19.90 ± 1.17 |
| Caput/corpus epididymis sperm count (×106/organ) | 236.70 ± 19.36a | 155.30 ± 22.05b | 195.80 ± 21.76a,b | 175.90 ± 7.83a,b |
| Caput/corpus epididymis sperm count (×106/g organ) | 521.40 ± 26.61a | 397.00 ± 34.22b | 510.80 ± 26.78a | 475.10 ± 12.61a,b |
| Transit time in the caput/corpus epididymis (days) | 4.98 ± 0.29 | 4.49 ± 0.48 | 4.15 ± 0.43 | 4.12 ± 0.40 |
| Cauda epididymis sperm count (106/organ) | 415.10 ± 25.26 | 285.50 ± 44.96 | 351.00 ± 36.33 | 339.80 ± 29.96 |
| Cauda epididymis sperm count (106/g organ) | 1295.00 ± 50.68a | 961.50 ± 59.96a | 1116.00 ± 49.41a,b | 1105.00 ± 20.14a,b |
| Transit time in the cauda epididymis (days) | 8.77 ± 0.43 | 8.11 ± 0.41 | 7.34 ± 0.37 | 8.02 ± 1.12 |
N = 6/group. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test followed by Tukey test was performed. a,bMean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Figure 3Histopathological evaluation of the testis. Values expressed as mean ± SEM. Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test followed by Dunn's test was performed. a, bMean values with the same letter do not differ statistically; P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
Figure 4Histological aspect of the testis and cauda epididymis (n = 5/group): (a, b) control group, (c, d) MeHg group, (e, f) Solanum group, and (g, h) MeHg + Solanum group. GC: germ cells; L: lumen; In: interstitial tissue; Ep: epithelium. Observe the presence of vacuoles (arrow) and degenerated seminiferous epithelium (asterisk) in the testis and empty segments (asterisk) and cell bodies in the lumen (arrow) in the epididymis. Final magnification: 200x.