Literature DB >> 24771408

Early erythropoietin for preventing red blood cell transfusion in preterm and/or low birth weight infants.

Arne Ohlsson1, Sanjay M Aher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low plasma levels of erythropoietin (EPO) in preterm infants provide a rationale for the use of EPO to prevent or treat anaemia.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of early initiation of EPO or darepoetin (initiated before eight days after birth) in reducing red blood cell (RBC) transfusions in preterm and/orlow birth weight infants. SEARCH
METHODS: The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, reference lists of identified trials and reviews, Pediatric Academic Societies Annual meetings 2000 to 2013 (Abstracts2View(TM)) and clinical trials registries (clinicaltrials.gov; controlled-trials.com; and who.int/ictrp) were searched in July 2013. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised controlled trials of early (< eight days of age) initiation of EPO treatment versus placebo or no intervention in preterm and/or low birth weightinfants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The methods of the Neonatal Cochrane Review Group were used. MAIN
RESULTS: The updated review includes 27 studies enrolling 2209 infants. One study enrolling infants at a mean age of > eight days and one duplicate publication were excluded. One new study using darepoetin was identified.Early EPO reduced the risk of the 'use of one or more RBC transfusions' (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73 to 0.85; typical risk difference (RD) -0.14, 95% CI -0.18 to -0.10; I(2) = 54% for both; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 7, 95% CI 6 to 10; 16 studies, 1661 infants).The total volume of RBCs transfused per infant was reduced (typical mean difference (MD) 7 mL/kg, 95% CI -12 to - 2; I(2) = 63%; 7 studies, 581 infants). The number of RBC transfusions per infant was minimally reduced (typical MD -0.27, 95% CI -0.42 to -0.12; I(2) = 64%; 13 studies, 951 infants). The number of donors to whom the infants were exposed was significantly reduced (MD-0.54, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.20; I(2) = 0%; 3 studies, 254 infants).There was a non-significant increase in the risk of stage ≥ 3 retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) with early EPO (typical RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.87 to 2.17; I(2) = 0%; typical RD 0.03, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.06; I(2) = 29%; 7 studies, 801 infants). A post hoc analysis including all studies that reported on ROP stage ≥ 3, regardless of the age of the infant when EPO treatment was started, showed a significantly increased typical RR of 1.48 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.13; P = 0.04; I(2) = 0%) and typical RD of 0.03 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.06; P = 0.03; I(2) = 50%; 10 studies, 1303 infants) with a number needed to treat to harm (NNTH) of 33 (95% CI 17 to infinity). In an Italian study in which the authors compared the use of early intravenous EPO with subcutaneous EPO the overall incidence of stage ≥ 3 was 15%, similar to the incidence of 17% in the study by Romagnoli and co-workers.The rates for mortality and morbidities including intraventricular haemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis were not significantly changed by early EPO treatment. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months varied. AUTHORS'
CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of EPO reduces the use of RBC transfusions, the volume of RBCs transfused, and donor exposure after study entry. The small reductions are likely to be of limited clinical importance. Donor exposure is probably not avoided since all but one study included infants who had received RBC transfusions prior to trial entry. In this update there was no significant increase in the rate of ROP (stage ≥ 3) for studies that initiated EPO treatment at less than eight days of age. In a post hoc analysis including all studies that reported on ROP stage ≥ 3 regardless of age at initiation of treatment there was an increased risk of ROP. The rates for mortality and morbidities including intraventricular haemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis were not significantly changed by early EPO treatment. Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months vary in the studies published to date. Ongoing research should deal with the issue of ROP and evaluate current clinical practice that will limit donor exposure. Due to the limited benefits and the possibly increased risk of ROP, administration of EPO is not recommended. Darbepoetin requires further study. The possible neuroprotective role of EPO in neonates will be reviewed in separate Cochrane reviews.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24771408     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004863.pub4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  27 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacologic interventions for the prevention and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity.

Authors:  Kay D Beharry; Gloria B Valencia; Douglas R Lazzaro; Jacob V Aranda
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  Why do four NICUs using identical RBC transfusion guidelines have different gestational age-adjusted RBC transfusion rates?

Authors:  E Henry; R D Christensen; M J Sheffield; L D Eggert; P D Carroll; S D Minton; D K Lambert; S J Ilstrup
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 3.  Early erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in preterm or low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Arne Ohlsson; Sanjay M Aher
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-16

4.  In Reply.

Authors:  Andreas Stahl; Wolfgang Göpel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Neonatal erythropoietin mitigates impaired gait, social interaction and diffusion tensor imaging abnormalities in a rat model of prenatal brain injury.

Authors:  Shenandoah Robinson; Christopher J Corbett; Jesse L Winer; Lindsay A S Chan; Jessie R Maxwell; Christopher V Anstine; Tracylyn R Yellowhair; Nicholas A Andrews; Yirong Yang; Laurel O Sillerud; Lauren L Jantzie
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 6.  Retinopathy of prematurity: a review of risk factors and their clinical significance.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Alexander D Port; Ryan Swan; J Peter Campbell; R V Paul Chan; Michael F Chiang
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 6.048

7.  Cognitive outcomes of preterm infants randomized to darbepoetin, erythropoietin, or placebo.

Authors:  Robin K Ohls; Beena D Kamath-Rayne; Robert D Christensen; Susan E Wiedmeier; Adam Rosenberg; Janell Fuller; Conra Backstrom Lacy; Mahshid Roohi; Diane K Lambert; Jill J Burnett; Barbara Pruckler; Hannah Peceny; Daniel C Cannon; Jean R Lowe
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 7.124

8.  Erythropoiesis Stimulating Agents Demonstrate Safety and Show Promise as Neuroprotective Agents in Neonates.

Authors:  Robin K Ohls; Robert D Christensen; John A Widness; Sandra E Juul
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Minimizing blood loss and the need for transfusions in very premature infants.

Authors:  Brigitte Lemyre; Megan Sample; Thierry Lacaze-Masmonteil
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.253

10.  Clinical Outcomes Related to the Gastrointestinal Trophic Effects of Erythropoietin in Preterm Neonates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anitha Ananthan; Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian; Shripada Rao; Sanjay Patole
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.