INTRODUCTION: The health benefits of exercise are well established. However, the relationship between exercise volume and intensity and health benefits remains unclear, particularly the benefits of low-volume and intensity exercise. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this investigation was, therefore, to examine the dose-response relationship between exercise volume and intensity with derived health benefits including volumes and intensity of activity well below international recommendations. METHODS:Generally healthy, active participants (n = 72; age = 44 ± 13 years) were assigned randomly to control (n = 10) or one of five 13-week exercise programs: (1) 10-min brisk walking 1×/week (n = 10), (2) 10-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 10), (3) 30-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 18), (4) 60-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 10), and (5) 30-min running 3×/week (n = 14), in addition to their regular physical activity. Health measures evaluated pre- and post-training including blood pressure, body composition, fasting lipids and glucose, and maximal aerobic power (VO2max). RESULTS:Health improvements were observed among programs at least 30 min in duration, including body composition and VO2max: 30-min walking 28.8-34.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1), 60-min walking 25.1-28.9 mL kg(-1) min(-1), and 30-min running 32.4-36.4 mL kg(-1) min(-1). The greater intensity running program also demonstrated improvements in triglycerides. CONCLUSION: In healthy active individuals, a physical activity program of at least 30 min in duration for three sessions/per week is associated with consistent improvements in health status.
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The health benefits of exercise are well established. However, the relationship between exercise volume and intensity and health benefits remains unclear, particularly the benefits of low-volume and intensity exercise. PURPOSE: The primary purpose of this investigation was, therefore, to examine the dose-response relationship between exercise volume and intensity with derived health benefits including volumes and intensity of activity well below international recommendations. METHODS: Generally healthy, active participants (n = 72; age = 44 ± 13 years) were assigned randomly to control (n = 10) or one of five 13-week exercise programs: (1) 10-min brisk walking 1×/week (n = 10), (2) 10-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 10), (3) 30-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 18), (4) 60-min brisk walking 3×/week (n = 10), and (5) 30-min running 3×/week (n = 14), in addition to their regular physical activity. Health measures evaluated pre- and post-training including blood pressure, body composition, fasting lipids and glucose, and maximal aerobic power (VO2max). RESULTS: Health improvements were observed among programs at least 30 min in duration, including body composition and VO2max: 30-min walking 28.8-34.5 mL kg(-1) min(-1), 60-min walking 25.1-28.9 mL kg(-1) min(-1), and 30-min running 32.4-36.4 mL kg(-1) min(-1). The greater intensity running program also demonstrated improvements in triglycerides. CONCLUSION: In healthy active individuals, a physical activity program of at least 30 min in duration for three sessions/per week is associated with consistent improvements in health status.
Authors: Darren Er Warburton; Sarah Charlesworth; Adam Ivey; Lindsay Nettlefold; Shannon Sd Bredin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-11 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Allison E DeVan; Maria M Anton; Jill N Cook; Daria B Neidre; Miriam Y Cortez-Cooper; Hirofumi Tanaka Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2005-02-17
Authors: C E Matthews; P S Freedson; J R Hebert; E J Stanek; P A Merriam; M C Rosal; C B Ebbeling; I S Ockene Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2001-01-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Mark S Tremblay; Darren E R Warburton; Ian Janssen; Donald H Paterson; Amy E Latimer; Ryan E Rhodes; Michelle E Kho; Audrey Hicks; Allana G Leblanc; Lori Zehr; Kelly Murumets; Mary Duggan Journal: Appl Physiol Nutr Metab Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.665
Authors: William L Haskell; I-Min Lee; Russell R Pate; Kenneth E Powell; Steven N Blair; Barry A Franklin; Caroline A Macera; Gregory W Heath; Paul D Thompson; Adrian Bauman Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: H Blain; A Jaussent; M-C Picot; L Maimoun; O Coste; T Masud; J Bousquet; P L Bernard Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2017 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Adriano César Carneiro Loureiro; Gabriella Fontenele Nocrato; André Luis Lima Correia; Robson Salviano de Matos; Júlio César Chaves Nunes Filho; Elisabeth De Francesco Daher; Flávio Henrique Macedo Pinto; Ariclécio Cunha de Oliveira; Vania Marilande Ceccatto; Rodrigo Soares Fortunato; Denise Pires de Carvalho Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Alen Palackic; Oscar E Suman; Craig Porter; Andrew J Murton; Craig G Crandall; Eric Rivas Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Ling-Ling Lee; Caroline A Mulvaney; Yoko Kin Yoke Wong; Edwin Sy Chan; Michael C Watson; Hui-Hsin Lin Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-02-24
Authors: Anders Fritz Lerche; Svend Erik Mathiassen; Charlotte Lund Rasmussen; Leon Straker; Karen Søgaard; Andreas Holtermann Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Jodi D Fitzgerald; Lindsey Johnson; Don G Hire; Walter T Ambrosius; Stephen D Anton; John A Dodson; Anthony P Marsh; Mary M McDermott; Joe R Nocera; Catrine Tudor-Locke; Daniel K White; Veronica Yank; Marco Pahor; Todd M Manini; Thomas W Buford Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Eduardo Carballeira; Karla C Censi; Ana Maseda; Rocío López-López; Laura Lorenzo-López; José C Millán-Calenti Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anderson A Silva; Daniela A Lima; Gabriella F Vieira; Aline A Fernandes; Danielle A G Pereira Journal: Braz J Phys Ther Date: 2015-10-09 Impact factor: 3.377