OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of effective organ and tissue donors and to understand which organs and tissues were donated for transplantation. METHODS: This was a quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, retrospective study that analyzed clinical data from 305 donors between January 2006 to December 2010. The data were then analyzed using descriptive analyses, generating frequency tables, measures of position (mean, minimum and maximum) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation) for data that was social and clinical in nature. RESULTS: There was an overall predominance of white (72%) and male (55%) individuals between the ages of 41 and 60 years (44%). The primary cause of brain death was cerebrovascular accident (55%). In the patient history, 31% of the patients were classified as overweight, 27% as hypertensive and only 4.3% as having diabetes mellitus. Vasoactive drugs were used in 92.7% of the donors, and the main drug of choice was noradrenaline (81.6%). Hyperglycemia and hypernatremia were diagnosed in 78% and 71% of the donors, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant hemodynamic changes were found, and the results indicate that the use of vasoactive drugs was the main strategy used to control these changes. Furthermore, most donors presented with hyperglycemia and hypernatremia, which were frequently reported in association with brain death. The persistent nature of these findings suggests that the organ donors were inadequately maintained.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize the profile of effective organ and tissue donors and to understand which organs and tissues were donated for transplantation. METHODS: This was a quantitative, descriptive, exploratory, retrospective study that analyzed clinical data from 305 donors between January 2006 to December 2010. The data were then analyzed using descriptive analyses, generating frequency tables, measures of position (mean, minimum and maximum) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation) for data that was social and clinical in nature. RESULTS: There was an overall predominance of white (72%) and male (55%) individuals between the ages of 41 and 60 years (44%). The primary cause of brain death was cerebrovascular accident (55%). In the patient history, 31% of the patients were classified as overweight, 27% as hypertensive and only 4.3% as having diabetes mellitus. Vasoactive drugs were used in 92.7% of the donors, and the main drug of choice was noradrenaline (81.6%). Hyperglycemia and hypernatremia were diagnosed in 78% and 71% of the donors, respectively. CONCLUSION: Significant hemodynamic changes were found, and the results indicate that the use of vasoactive drugs was the main strategy used to control these changes. Furthermore, most donors presented with hyperglycemia and hypernatremia, which were frequently reported in association with brain death. The persistent nature of these findings suggests that the organ donors were inadequately maintained.
In the area of transplantation, Brazil is notable for having one of the largest public
organ and tissue transplant programs in the world, currently ranked second in kidney,
liver and cornea transplants according to absolute numbers.( Thus, despite the advances in transplantation and the
fact that Brazil has a systematic and legal protocol for diagnosing brain death
(BD),( there is still a
growing imbalance between the supply and demand for organs.(Among potential brain-dead organ donors, there are several reasons for not harvesting
the organs for donation,( of which
cardiac arrest (CA) is the second leading reason for not harvesting organs for donation
in 2012, reaching 52% in some regions.(To increase the number of brain-dead organ and tissue donors, it is vital that the
occurrence of CA be reduced by employing strategies aimed at maintaining the
physiological stability of the patient, thus achieving the maximum vitality of
potentially transplantable organs.Maintaining the potential brain-dead donor requires the dedication and technical
expertise of the team responsible for patient care because, during BD, a series of
physiological changes occur that contribute to the instability of the patient, which may
result in hypotension, diabetes insipidus, hypothermia, hypernatremia, metabolic
acidosis, pulmonary edema and disseminated intravascular coagulation,(
in addition to hyperglycemia, which can be explained by the combination of elevated
endogenous catecholamines, exogenous inotropic agents and steroids, which are further
aggravated by the administration of glycosylated substances.(These physiological changes may occur secondary to patient treatment, neurological
damage or as a result of physiological changes resulting from BD.( When these changes are present in a
potential donor, they can contribute to CA.Although organ and tissue transplantation is a safe and effective therapeutic
alternative in the treatment of various diseases, resulting in improved quality of life
and increased likelihood of survival,( there is a race against time to turn a potential donor, with all the
hemodynamic/physiological instability that BD causes, into an effective donor that can
offer recipients the highest quality organs. Thus, there is a need to know the
functional status of the organs that are removed for transplantation and to adopt
corrective strategies in response to possible changes. This study therefore aimed to
characterize the profile of effective organ and tissue donors.
METHODS
This was a quantitative, descriptive, exploratory and retrospective study.( The research was conducted at the Organ
and Tissue Procurement Service of the Hospital de Clínicas da
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), located in the city of
Campinas, São Paulo (SP), Brazil. This service is responsible for the
notification and implementation of donations in all the hospitals in the administrative
region of Campinas. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the
Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, UNICAMP (Opinion
Nº 1163/2011), which granted a waiver for the informed consent requirement.The study population consisted of patients whose data were contained in the "Information
About Multiple Organ Donor" records of the Organ and Tissue Procurement Services
(potential deceased donors who were brain dead) and who underwent surgery to remove the
organs (effective donor) with the approval of the Organ Notification, Procurement and
Distribution Center of the municipality of Ribeirão Preto.The patient records that were reviewed and analyzed were from the period between January
2006 and December 2010. They contained all the information necessary to meet the
inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol. Data collection was performed
between December 2011 and January 2012.The inclusion criteria were that the data contained in the record showed that patients
were effective donors, i.e., the extraction surgery was performed. These patients were
identified by records showing that the extracted organs were subsequently implanted or
discarded for transplantation (when sent for pathological examinations).The exclusion criteria included prospective donors who were not effective donors, i.e.,
who did not undergo surgical removal of organs, and living organ donors, understood here
as related (relatives up to the fourth degree) or unrelated (no relation) donors.The principal investigator performed the data collection on the premises of the Organ
and Tissue Procurement Services.The data on the effective donors were recovered using records on Multiple Organ Donors
prepared by the State Department of Health/State Transplant System (records available at
the Organ and Tissue Procurement Services) and then entered into a spreadsheet prepared
especially for this study. The following information was recorded: gender, age range,
race, cause of BD, comorbidities (hypertension - HTN, diabetes mellitus - DM in the
donor or in first-degree relatives - DFDR), obesity, habits (tobacco use, drug addiction
and alcoholism), mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels, amount and type of vasoactive
drugs (DVA) used, serum levels of urea, creatinine, sodium, potassium and glucose and
the organs and tissues donated.The data were transferred to the program Excel for Windows/2003 and then to the program
Statistical Analysis System (SAS) for Windows, version 8.02, for the descriptive
analyses and to calculate frequency tables, measures of position (mean, minimum and
maximum) and measures of dispersion (standard deviation) for data that were social and
clinical in nature.The reference values used in adults, which were established by the pathology laboratory
at the Hospital de Clínicas of the UNICAMP where the blood
samples were processed, were serum urea (<58mg/dL), creatinine (male up to
1.2mg/dL and female up to 0.9mg/dl), sodium (136 to 146mEq/L), potassium (3.1 to
5.4mEq/L) and glucose (60 to 100mg/dL). The discrimination criteria for being overweight
(body mass index - BMI≥25) or obese (BMI≥30) were based on the
classification defined by the World Health Organization.(
RESULTS
The Organ and Tissue Procurement Services of the Hospital de
Clínicas of the UNICAMP, from January 2006 to December 2010, provided
305 effective donors for the State Transplantation System of São Paulo.The majority of the effective donors were male (n=167, 55%) and Caucasian (n=220, 72%),
with a mean age of 41.45±14.1 years (ranging from 1.5 years to 81 years), as
shown in table 1.
Table 1
Descriptive, clinical, hemodynamic characterization and renal and electrolyte
profiles of effective donors
Variable
Result (N=305)
Age (years)
41.45±14.1
Race
Caucasian
220 (72.0)
Black
28 (9.0)
Asian
3 (0.9)
Pardo (mixed race)
54 (17.0)
Male
167 (55)
History
Overweight
95 (31.15)
HTN
82 (27.0)
DFDR
42 (14.0)
Obesity
23 (7.55)
DM
13 (4.3)
Habits
Tobacco use
60 (19.7)
Alcoholism
57 (18.7)
Drug addiction
27 (8.8)
Hemodynamics
VAG
283 (92.7)
Noradrenaline
249 (81.6)
Dose (mcg/kg/min)
0.21 (0.001-3.25)
Dopamine
73 (24.0)
Dose (mcg/kg/min)
7 (0.1-20.0)
Dobutamine
9 (3.0)
Dose (mcg/kg/min)
7.5 (4.0-10.0)
Vasopressin
2 (0.65)
Dose (U/min)
0.44 (0.4-0.48)
Renal profile
Creatinine (mg/dL)
0.93±0.11
Urea (mg/dL)
47±29.3
Electrolyte profile
Sodium (mEq/L)
160.42±16.1
Potassium (mEq/L)
3.33±1.0
Glucose (mg/dL)
162.5±86.0
HTN - hypertension; DFDR - first-degree relatives with diabetes mellitus, DM -
diabetes mellitus; VAG - vasoactive drugs. Results are expressed as number
(percentage), mean±standard deviation or median (minimum–maximum).
Descriptive, clinical, hemodynamic characterization and renal and electrolyte
profiles of effective donorsHTN - hypertension; DFDR - first-degree relatives with diabetes mellitus, DM -
diabetes mellitus; VAG - vasoactive drugs. Results are expressed as number
(percentage), mean±standard deviation or median (minimum–maximum).Figure 1 shows that 44% (n=135) of the donors
evaluated by the Organ and Tissue Procurement Services of the Hospital de
Clínicas of the UNICAMP were in the 41-60 year age group.
Figure 1
Distribution of organ and tissue donors according to age range.
Distribution of organ and tissue donors according to age range.Among the primary causes of BD in effective donors evaluated, cerebrovascular accident
(CVA) was the most predominant, responsible for more than half of all cases of BD (55%),
followed by traumatic brain injury (TBI) at 35% and "other", which accounted for a total
of 10% of the cases of BD, including central nervous system tumors, hypoxicischaemic
encephalopathy, firearm injuries and hydrocephalus.Of the history and lifestyle habits of the donors (Table 1), being overweight (31.15%) and hypertensive (27.0%) stood out. Among
the lifestyle habits, tobacco use or alcohol consumption were found in approximately 20%
of the donors.For hemodynamic maintenance, ventricular assist devices (VADs) were used in 92.7%
(n=283) of the donors, of which noradrenaline was the main drug of choice (n=249, 81.6%)
and vasopressin the secondary drug of choice (n=2, 0.65%) (Table 1). The mean MAP levels were 88.02±17.02mmHg (ranging
from 49 to 136.66mmHg).According to table 1, the renal function
evaluation of potential organ and tissue donors revealed an average creatinine level of
0.93±0.11mg/dL (ranging from 0.05 to 6.7mg/dL). For urea, the mean level was
47.0±29.3mg/dL (ranging from 10 to 221mg/dL). Values that were higher than the
accepted reference values for serum creatinine levels were observed in 159 (52.1%)
effective donors, 89 (29.2%) of whom had creatinine values >1.5mg/dL, and of
these, 77 (25.3%) were kidney donors.For the electrolyte profile, the mean serum sodium level was 160.42±16.1mEq/L
(127 to 203mEq/L), and the mean potassium level was 3.33±1.0mEq/L (1.4 to
7.8mEq/L). In 189 (62%) donors, the serum sodium levels were greater than 155mEq/L, and
of these, the liver was harvested from 162 (53.1%) donors.The average blood glucose level was 162.5±86.0mg/dL (55 to 586mg/dL), and
hyperglycemia was observed in 78.4% of the donors evaluated. In 29.2% (n=89) of the
donors, the blood glucose value was higher than 180mg/dL. Hypernatremia was observed in
77.7% (n=237) of the donors, and hypokalemia was observed in 15.0% (n=46).All the donors with expanded criteria had at least one organ harvested. Among the 14
donors more than 60 years of age, 12 were liver donors and 14 were kidney donors. Of the
donors between the ages of 50 and 59 years with prior HTN and who had a CVA as the cause
of coma (n=36), 29 of them were liver donors and 34 were kidney donors. Among the obese
donors (n=23), there were 18 liver donors, 16 kidney donors, three heart donors and
three pancreas donors.In total, 92.7% (n=283) of the donors had their kidney harvested, 87.8% (n=268) their
liver, 79.0% (n=241) their corneas, 23.3% (n=71) their pancreas, 11.5% (n=35) their
bones, 11.1% (n=34) their hearts and only 6% (n=18) their lungs.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, the major comorbidities observed in organ and tissue donors from
the Organ and Tissue Procurement Services of the Hospital de
Clínicas of the UNICAMP included being overweight and hypertensive.
For pressure stability, noradrenaline was the drug of choice, and vasopressin was used
the least often. Hyperglycemia and hypernatremia were the most frequent metabolic
disorders, representing, in part, the likely failure to maintain potential donors. The
serum creatinine levels were greater than the reference values in more than 50% of the
donors, and of those with creatinine levels >1.5mg/dL (89, 29.2%), 77 (25.3%)
were kidney donors. At least one organ was harvested in 100% of the donors who were
considered "marginal". The kidneys were harvested the most frequently compared to other
organs, such as the liver, pancreas, heart and lungs. The corneas were the tissue
harvested most frequently for transplantation.Studies performed in Brazil( and abroad( are
consistent with the present study, i.e., the age range of approximately 50% of the
donors was between 41 and 60 years.Of the primary causes of BD among organ and tissue donors, CVA was the most prevalent,
which is consistent with reports by other researchers.( In the
present study, TBI was the second leading cause, and this finding is confirmed in the
literature.( These data
indicate a change in the profile of organ donors because traumatic causes are being
supplanted by CVA as the cause of death. This change may be related to stricter traffic
regulations in Brazil, which have reduced the number of automotive accidents and
increased the life expectancy of Brazilians.Researchers have shown direct correlations between CVA and cardiovascular diseases with
obesity, hypertension, diabetes, tobacco use and alcoholism.( In recent
decades, the number of obese donors has been increasing, and complications following
renal transplantation have been correlated with being overweight and obese.(As we observed in this study for donors with these comorbidities and potentially
health-compromising social habits, the quality of the graft is expected to be worse
because of the dysfunctional organic processes that characterize these diseases.Donors with such risk factors are referred to as "marginal", "borderline" or "expanded
criteria" donors, and these donations have been legalized by laws governing
transplantation due to the small number of organs available for transplantation in
Brazil.(The use of organs from "marginal" donors may increase the chances of transplant failure.
One study reported an increase in mortality in liver transplant patients, especially in
cases in which the recipients were more seriously ill.(Due to the shortage of organs and the number of people needing a transplant, it is
extremely important that potential donors are well cared for by trained professionals,
minimizing important endocrine, metabolic and hemodynamic disturbances caused by BD.Hemodynamic maintenance is the main challenge in treating potential donors because
following the adrenergic storm, hypotension is observed, which is a common problem that
leads to decreased perfusion of various organs,( requiring the pressure parameters to be corrected fairly
quickly. Experts recommend that the achievable blood pressure goals should be a MAP
between 60 and 80mmHg and a systolic BP ranging from 90 to 100mmHg.(To ensure adequate perfusion, vasopressor and inotropic support should be provided if
the minimum BP is not reached or maintained after adequate volume expansion. Vasopressor
and/or inotropic drugs should then be given with caution because the overuse of these
drugs can lead to severe vasoconstriction followed by ischemia of the organs.( The administration (more restrictive) of fluids for fluid
replacement in maintaining the potential donor has resulted in an increased number of
successful lung transplants.(In the present study, the analysis of the mean blood pressure values (MAP
88.02±17.02 mmHg, ranging from 49 to 136.66mmHg) and VAD use in a large number of
donors (92.7%) indicates that the use of vasopressor drugs in potential donors may have
been excessive and/or indiscriminate, given that most of the MAP values in this study
were higher than those recommended in the literature.One strategy by which to improve hemodynamic maintenance in potential deceased donors
involves hormone replacement therapy, with the administration of vasopressin, thyroid
hormones and corticosteroids.( In
this study, the use of vasopressin was limited (only administered to two donors, 0.65%),
which can be explained by the fact that the donor sample consisted of organ and tissue
donors from the period between 2006 and 2010, which is well before the "Guidelines for
the Handling of Multiple Organs from Potential Adult Deceased Donors" was available to
the Brazilian scientific community.The use of managed treatment protocols for potential deceased donors helps improve the
hemodynamic and physiological maintenance of these patients by reducing the incidence of
CA before harvesting the organs, which may contribute to an increase in the supply of
organs and tissues.(In the analysis of the renal profile, the mean creatinine and urea levels, as shown in
table 1, were found to be comparable to those
reported by Weissenbacher et al.(
in a sample of 1,113 deceased kidney donors.A study indicates that changes in glucose levels, if not corrected, affect the renal
function of donors.( Olmos et
al.( reported significant
correlations between donors undergoing procedures to correct blood glucose levels and
improved renal function.Blasi-Ibañez et al.(
evaluated 458 organ donors and showed a strong correlation between blood glucose and
serum creatinine levels immediately before nephrectomy, reporting blood glucose levels
>200mg/dL in 72% of the donors at the time of organ harvesting. However, these
findings are somewhat controversial because there is only a limited number of studies
that have performed correlation analyses with these variables in brain-dead patients. In
addition, in a study conducted using intensive care patients, there was an increase in
mortality reported for patients who were maintained at normoglycemia.(In maintaining potential organ donors, experts recommend that hyperglycemia be corrected
using intravenous insulin therapy to achieve blood glucose levels of
<180mg/dL.( In an American study that compared
blood glucose levels in deceased organ donors and the use of glycemic control protocols
during the period from 2005 to 2006 (donors not receiving the glycemic control
protocols) and the period from 2009 to 2010 (donors receiving the glycemic control
protocols), the reported averages were 212±32 and 162±44mg/dL,
respectively.( The high blood
glucose values observed in the present study (162.5±86.0mg/dL, 55 to 586mg/dL)
suggest the lack of or ineffectiveness of the protocols for glycemic control in caring
for potential donors.As for hypernatremia, sodium levels >155mEq/L may contribute to edema,
dysfunction, apoptosis and cellular necrosis. These complications contribute to primary
graft failure, with the worst results evident in liver transplants.( The analysis of heart donors showed an increase in the mortality of
recipients when the serum sodium levels were <130mEq/L or
>170mEq/L.( The data
collected in this study, in which the mean serum sodium level was
160.42±16.1mEq/L (ranging from 127 to 203mEq/L), showed that disorders of this
electrolyte, coupled with other metabolic abnormalities, put at risk the quality of the
organs that were extracted from the donors at the Organ and Tissue Procurement Services
of the Hospital de Clínicas of the UNICAMP.Understanding these changes in potential donors, as well as factors that reduce the
quality of the graft supplied for transplantation such as age, tobacco use, history of
alcoholism, cause of BD, cold ischemia time (time that the organ is outside the donor's
body and under refrigeration) >12 hours and warm ischemia time (time between the
onset of the anastomosis of the vena cava and portal vein reperfusion in liver
recipients) >45 minutes,(
should help doctors anticipate major complications in transplant patients.As noted in this study, the primary harvested organ was the kidney (in 92.7% of
effective donors). This fact can be explained by certain advantages that the kidneys
have over other solid organs that are harvested: a prolonged cold ischemia time of up to
36 hours,( acceptable donor age of 75 years, provided that renal function
is preserved and the presence of two organs (some changes observed by the surgeon at the
time of the nephrectomy can lead to discarding only one kidney). Moraes et
al.( reported similar results
to those observed in this study, including that 81% of their patients were kidney donors
and only 2% were lung donors. These numbers are typical worldwide.( For tissue donations, corneas were the
primary tissue harvested (79%), which can also be explained by the advantages that this
tissue has over other tissues, including that it is not limited by age or the blood type
of the potential donor and that it can be harvest up to 24 hours later if the body of
the donor is maintained at the appropriate temperature (4°C).(Therefore, this study detected the harvest of organs and tissues from donors with
expanded criteria and identified flaws in the hemodynamic and physiological maintenance
of these patients. The limitations of the study included that it was not possible to
analyze the function of these organs following explantation (either the transplanted
organs or those sent for pathology) or to identify the actions taken by the care teams
concerning the observed changes.We suggest that correlation studies be performed to verify the function of these grafts
and the quality of life of the transplant patients and to analyze the primary changes
that led to the discarding of the graft.
CONCLUSION
When considering the clinical profile of effective donors, being overweight and
hypertensive were the most common comorbidities observed. Notably, most of the patients
had altered serum levels of glucose, sodium and creatinine. Hemodynamic instability
occurred in the majority of the subjects, and the use of noradrenaline as a vasopressor
drug was observed in almost all cases. Finally, among the "marginal" donors, 100% had at
least one organ harvested. The kidneys were the organ that was harvested the most often
for transplant, followed by the liver, pancreas, heart, lungs and corneas.
Authors: Annemarie Weissenbacher; Maximilian Jara; Hanno Ulmer; Matthias Biebl; Claudia Bösmüller; Stefan Schneeberger; Gert Mayer; Johann Pratschke; Robert Öllinger Journal: Transplantation Date: 2012-03-15 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: E Totsuka; U Fung; K Hakamada; M Tanaka; K Takahashi; M Nakai; S Morohashi; A Nishimura; Y Ishizawa; H Ono; Y Toyoki; S Narumi; M Sasaki Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: J O Medina-Pestana; E M Sampaio; T H F Santos; C M Aoqui; A L Ammirati; D Caron; M Galvao-Pereira Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Telesforo Bacchella; Flávio Henrique Ferreira Galvão; José Luiz Jesus de Almeida; Estela Regina Figueira; Andreza de Moraes; Marcel Cerqueira César Machado Journal: Sao Paulo Med J Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 1.044
Authors: J C Jeong; M G Kim; H Ro; Y J Kim; H C Park; H Y Kwon; H J Jeon; J Ha; C Ahn; J Yang Journal: Transplant Proc Date: 2012-05 Impact factor: 1.066
Authors: Annabel Blasi-Ibanez; Ryutaro Hirose; John Feiner; Chris Freise; Peter G Stock; John P Roberts; Claus U Niemann Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.892