Smooth muscle contraction is activated primarily by phosphorylation at Ser19 of the regulatory light chain subunits (LC20) of myosin II, catalysed by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase. Ca(2+)-independent contraction can be induced by inhibition of myosin light chain phosphatase, which correlates with diphosphorylation of LC20 at Ser19 and Thr18, catalysed by integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK). LC20 diphosphorylation at Ser19 and Thr18 has been detected in mammalian vascular smooth muscle tissues in response to specific contractile stimuli (e.g. endothelin-1 stimulation of rat renal afferent arterioles) and in pathophysiological situations associated with hypercontractility (e.g. cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage). Comparison of the effects of LC 20 monophosphorylation at Ser19 and diphosphorylation at Ser19 and Thr18 on contraction and relaxation of Triton-skinned rat caudal arterial smooth muscle revealed that phosphorylation at Thr18 has no effect on steady-state force induced by Ser19 phosphorylation. On the other hand, the rates of dephosphorylation and relaxation are significantly slower following diphosphorylation at Thr18 and Ser19 compared to monophosphorylation at Ser19. We propose that this diphosphorylation mechanism underlies the prolonged contractile response of particular vascular smooth muscle tissues to specific stimuli, e.g. endothelin-1 stimulation of renal afferent arterioles, and the vasospastic behavior observed in pathological conditions such as cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage and coronary arterial vasospasm. ILK and ZIPK may, therefore, be useful therapeutic targets for the treatment of such conditions.
Smooth muscle contraction is activated primarily by phosphorylation at Ser19 of the regulatory light chain subunits (LC20) of myosin II, catalysed by Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent myosin light chain kinase. Ca(2+)-independent contraction can be induced by inhibition of myosin light chain phosphatase, which correlates with diphosphorylation of LC20 at Ser19 and Thr18, catalysed by integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK). LC20 diphosphorylation at Ser19 and Thr18 has been detected in mammalian vascular smooth muscle tissues in response to specific contractile stimuli (e.g. endothelin-1 stimulation of rat renal afferent arterioles) and in pathophysiological situations associated with hypercontractility (e.g. cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage). Comparison of the effects of LC 20 monophosphorylation at Ser19 and diphosphorylation at Ser19 and Thr18 on contraction and relaxation of Triton-skinned rat caudal arterial smooth muscle revealed that phosphorylation at Thr18 has no effect on steady-state force induced by Ser19 phosphorylation. On the other hand, the rates of dephosphorylation and relaxation are significantly slower following diphosphorylation at Thr18 and Ser19 compared to monophosphorylation at Ser19. We propose that this diphosphorylation mechanism underlies the prolonged contractile response of particular vascular smooth muscle tissues to specific stimuli, e.g. endothelin-1 stimulation of renal afferent arterioles, and the vasospastic behavior observed in pathological conditions such as cerebral vasospasm following subarachnoid hemorrhage and coronary arterial vasospasm. ILK and ZIPK may, therefore, be useful therapeutic targets for the treatment of such conditions.
The central role of myosin regulatory light chain phosphorylation in the activation of smooth
muscle contraction
Vascular smooth muscle contraction is activated by an increase in cytosolic free
Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) as a result of Ca2+
entry from the extracellular space and/or Ca2+ release from intracellular stores,
primarily the sarcoplasmic reticulum (1).
Ca2+ diffuses to the contractile machinery where it binds to calmodulin (CaM)
(2). The (Ca2+)4-CaM complex
induces a conformational change in myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), which involves removal of
the autoinhibitory domain from the active site, thereby converting the kinase from an inactive
to an active state (3). MLCK is physically bound through
its N-terminus to actin filaments and, upon activation, phosphorylates nearby
myosin molecules (4). Myosin II filaments are composed
of hexameric myosin molecules, each consisting of two heavy chains and two pairs of light
chains (17-kDa essential light chains (LC17) and 20-kDa regulatory light chains
(LC20)) located in the neck region of the myosin molecule (Fig. 1). Activated MLCK phosphorylates Ser19 of LC20 and this simple
post-translational modification induces a conformational change that is transmitted to the
myosin heads, resulting in actin interaction and a marked increase in the actin-activated
MgATPase activity of myosin (5). The energy derived from
the hydrolysis of ATP then drives cross-bridge cycling and the development of force or
contraction of the muscle. Relaxation follows the removal of Ca2+ from the cytosol,
primarily by CaATPases, which pump Ca2+ out of the cell and back into the
sarcoplasmic reticulum (6). MLCK is inactivated as
Ca2+ dissociates from CaM and the autoinhibitory domain of MLCK blocks the active
site. Phosphorylated myosin is then dephosphorylated by myosin light chain phosphatase (MLCP),
a type 1 protein serine/threonine phosphatase (7).
MLCP is a trimeric phosphatase with a 38-kDa catalytic subunit (PP1cδ), a 130-kDa
regulatory subunit (MYPT1) and a 21-kDa subunit of uncertain function. MYPT1 targets the
phosphatase holoenzyme to myosin and enhances its activity. MLCP is inhibited by both
protein kinase C (PKC) and RhoA/Rho-associated kinase (ROK) pathways. Phosphorylation of the
cytosolic phosphatase inhibitory protein of 17-kDa (CPI-17) at Thr38 by PKC converts CPI-17
to a potent inhibitor of MLCP, which is achieved by direct interaction of phosphorylated
CPI-17 with PP1cδ (8). ROK is also capable of
phosphorylating CPI-17 at Thr38 (9). In addition, and
apparently of greater physiological significance, ROK phosphorylates MYPT1 to induce
inhibition of MLCP activity. ROK phosphorylates MYPT1 at Thr697 and Thr855 (rat numbering)
in vitro and both phosphorylation events result in phosphatase inhibition
(10). However, it appears that ROK predominantly
phosphorylates Thr855 in intact tissues (11).
Activation of PKC and ROK pathways, therefore, can result in decreased MLCP activity,
resulting in an increase in the ratio of MLCK: MLCP activity and an increase in force. Since
ROK and novel PKC isoforms are Ca2+-independent, this results in Ca2+
sensitization of contraction, i.e. an increase in force without an increase in
[Ca2+]i.
Myosin regulatory light chain diphosphorylation
The possibility that LC20 may also be phosphorylated at Thr18 was originally
demonstrated in vitro when it was shown that high concentrations of MLCK
phosphorylate Thr18 in addition to Ser19 (12). It is
clear, however, that MLCK does not phosphorylate Thr18 of LC20 in intact smooth
muscle tissues, and most contractile stimuli are associated with LC20
phosphorylation exclusively at Ser19, which can be attributed to MLCK (13). Interest in Thr18 phosphorylation was revived, however, when it was
shown that treatment of smooth muscle tissues with membrane-permeant phosphatase inhibitors
(such as calyculin-A) induced Ca2+-independent contractions that correlated with
diphosphorylation of LC20 at Thr18 and Ser19 (14). Two Ca2+-independent kinases (integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and
zipper-interacting protein kinase (ZIPK)) were shown to be the most likely kinases
responsible for LC20 diphosphorylation (15,16,17).
Evidence of myosin regulatory light chain diphosphorylation in intact smooth muscle
tissues
Phosphorylation of LC20 at Thr18 and Ser19 has been observed in several smooth
muscle tissues, e.g. bovine tracheal smooth muscle in response to neural stimulation or
carbachol (18, 19), rabbit thoracic aorta treated with prostaglandin-F2α (20, 21) and renal
afferent arterioles stimulated with endothelin-1 (22). LC20 diphosphorylation has frequently been associated with
pathophysiological conditions involving hypercontractility, including cerebral vasospasm
(23), coronary (24, 25) and femoral arterial vasospasm
(26), intimal hyperplasia (27) and hypertension (28).
The functional effects of diphosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains
Early studies comparing the properties of smooth muscle myosin phosphorylated at Ser19 (by
low concentrations of MLCK) and at both Thr18 and Ser19 (by high concentrations of MLCK)
indicated that the additional phosphorylation at Thr18 increased the actomyosin MgATPase
activity some two- to three-fold (12, 29,30,31). However, the velocity of movement of myosin-coated
beads along actin cables (32) or of actin filaments
over immobilized myosin in the in vitro motility assay (31) was similar whether LC20 was
phosphorylated at Ser19 alone or at both Thr18 and Ser19. We recently addressed the
hypothesis that phosphorylation at Thr18 may enhance the level of steady-state force
achieved with Ser19 phosphorylation (13). To test
this hypothesis, we used Triton-skinned rat caudal arterial smooth muscle strips. The
objective was to achieve stoichiometric phosphorylation of LC20 at Ser19, then
elicit phosphorylation at Thr18 and observe whether or not there was a further increase in
steady-state force. The challenge was to achieve stoichiometric phosphorylation at Ser19
since this cannot be done in intact tissue due to the competing actions of MLCK and MLCP,
which results in stable phosphorylation of LC20 at steady-state of ≤ 0.5 mol
Pi/mol LC20. Furthermore, this problem cannot be overcome by
inhibition of phosphatase activity since phosphatase inhibitors such as calyculin-A and
okadaic acid unmask the basal activities of ILK and ZIPK, which phosphorylate both Thr18 and
Ser19 of LC20. We took advantage of the fact that protein kinases generally,
including MLCK, can utilize adenosine 5′-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (ATPγS) as
a substrate to thiophosphorylate their protein substrates (33), but the thiophosphorylated protein (LC20 in this case) is a very
poor phosphatase substrate (34). It was necessary to
use Triton-skinned tissue for this experiment since the plasma membrane is impermeant to
ATPγS. Fig. 2 shows the experimental protocol and corresponding force measurements (Fig. 2A) and analysis of LC20
(thio)phosphorylation by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE (see below for a description of this technique,
which enables the separation of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated forms of
LC20) (Fig. 2B). At resting tension
(pCa 9), LC20 is unphosphorylated (lanes 1 and 8, Fig. 2B). A control contraction was elicited by increasing
[Ca2+] to pCa 4.5 in the presence of ATP and relaxation followed removal of
Ca2+ (Fig. 2A). When basal force was
restored, the tissue was washed several times in pCa 9 solution without ATP to remove all
ATP, following which ATPγS was added at pCa 4.5 to elicit close-to-stoichiometric
LC20 thiophosphorylation (Fig. 2B,
lanes 2 and 3). Contraction did not occur under these conditions since ATPγS is not
hydrolysed by the actin-activated myosin MgATPase and, therefore, ATPγS cannot support
cross-bridge cycling (35,36,37). Following LC20
thiophosphorylation, ATPγS was washed out by several washes with pCa 9 solution (Fig. 2A). This was accompanied by very little
dethiophosphorylation of LC20 (Fig. 2B,
lane 4). ATP was then added at pCa 9, whereupon the tissue contracted rapidly due to the
fact that LC20 was previously thiophosphorylated. Again there was very little
dethiophosphorylation during this treatment (Fig.
2B, lane 5). The level of force achieved during this treatment was comparable to
that elicited initially by addition of ATP at pCa 4.5 (Fig. 2A). Finally, the phosphatase inhibitor microcystin was added at pCa 9 in the
presence of ATP, whereupon Ser19-thiophosphorylated LC20 was phosphorylated at
Thr18 (1S1P in lanes 6 and 7 of Fig. 2B). Small
amounts of monophosphorylated (1P) and diphosphorylated (2P) LC20 were also
detected due to the presence (Fig. 2B, lane 5) of
a small amount of unphosphorylated LC20 prior to the addition of microcystin.
Fig. 2B, lane 9 shows a control Triton-skinned
tissue treated with microcystin and ATP at pCa 9 to indicate the migration of
unphosphorylated (0P), monophosphorylated (1P) and diphosphorylated (2P) LC20, as
previously established (13). The key finding from
this experiment was that phosphorylation of LC20 at Thr18 on top of
close-to-stoichiometric thiophosphorylation of LC20 at Ser19 did not elicit an
increase in force.
Fig. 4 provides a schematic representation of the renal microcirculation, which consists of
the afferent arteriole conveying blood from the interlobular artery to the glomerular
capillaries where it is filtered prior to returning to the systemic circulation via the
efferent arteriole. The afferent arteriole plays a key role in regulating glomerular inflow
resistance and must be able to respond very rapidly to sudden changes in systemic blood
pressure in order to protect the fragile glomeruli from pressure-induced damage (39). Angiotensin II (Ang II) is a renal-selective
vasoconstrictor that contributes to renal vascular resistance under normal physiological
conditions and thereby plays an important role in modulating renal hemodynamics (40). Endothelin-1 (ET-1), on the other hand, is a renal
vasoconstrictor that does not contribute to renal vascular resistance under normal
physiological conditions, but is implicated in abnormal renal vasoconstriction and reduced
glomerular filtration in pathological states such as diabetes and chronic kidney disease
(41,42,43,44,45,46,47).
Fig. 4.
Schematic diagram illustrating the anatomical relationship of the afferent
arteriole, glomerulus, and the efferent arteriole. The afferent arteriole controls the
glomerular inflow resistance. This vessel must constrict rapidly in response to
fluctuations in blood pressure to prevent pressure elevations from being transmitted
to the downstream glomerular capillaries. The efferent arteriole originates at the
glomerular capillaries and regulates glomerular outflow resistance. When renal
perfusion pressure is compromised, a sustained increase in efferent arteriolar tone
maintains adequate filtration pressure within the upstream glomerular capillaries,
thereby preserving renal function. This figure was reproduced from ref. (52) with permission.
Schematic diagram illustrating the anatomical relationship of the afferent
arteriole, glomerulus, and the efferent arteriole. The afferent arteriole controls the
glomerular inflow resistance. This vessel must constrict rapidly in response to
fluctuations in blood pressure to prevent pressure elevations from being transmitted
to the downstream glomerular capillaries. The efferent arteriole originates at the
glomerular capillaries and regulates glomerular outflow resistance. When renal
perfusion pressure is compromised, a sustained increase in efferent arteriolar tone
maintains adequate filtration pressure within the upstream glomerular capillaries,
thereby preserving renal function. This figure was reproduced from ref. (52) with permission.Based on our studies of the effects of LC20 diphosphorylation described above,
we developed a hypothesis that pathological situations of hypercontractility may result from
impaired relaxation due to diphosphorylation of LC20 at Thr18 and Ser19. We have
tested this hypothesis by studying the effects of two contractile stimuli, one physiological
(Ang II) and one pathophysiological (ET-1), on renal afferent arteriolar constriction and
LC20 phosphorylation. We compared the patterns of phosphorylation of
LC20 in the afferent arteriole to determine whether or not LC20
diphosphorylation is associated with the pathophysiological stimulus ET-1 and not the
physiological stimulus Ang II. This proved to be a challenging proposition due largely to
the very small size of the afferent arteriole: a single afferent arteriole has a diameter of
15–20 µm, contains < 100 smooth muscle cells and is ∼1/10th the size of a
human eyelash. This necessitated developing a technique to isolate individual afferent
arterioles and enhance the sensitivity of detection and quantification of LC20
phosphorylation. Perfusion of the renal artery with molten agarose followed by cooling to
solidify the agarose enabled dissection and recovery of intact afferent arterioles (48). Phos-tag SDS-PAGE (49) proved to be a suitable technique for rapid and efficient separation of
unphosphorylated and phosphorylated forms of LC20 (50). In this technique, tissue proteins are separated in Laemmli SDS gels
in which a phosphate-binding ligand (Phos-tag reagent) is immobilized in the running gel. In
the presence of Mn2+ ions, the migration of proteins containing phosphorylated
serine, threonine and/or tyrosine residues is retarded due to binding to the ligand. The
higher the stoichiometry of phosphorylation, the slower the migration rate through the gel.
The protein of interest (LC20 in this instance) is then detected by western
blotting with an antibody that recognizes all forms of the protein, phosphorylated and
unphosphorylated. The effectiveness of the separation of the various LC20 species
by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE can be clearly seen in Figs. 2B and 3C. Quantification of the different
LC20 species by densitometric scanning enables determination of the
stoichiometry of phosphorylation, and the individual phosphorylation sites can be identified
by using phosphorylation site-specific antibodies in parallel western blotting experiments.
We were able to increase the sensitivity of detection of LC20 > 4,000-fold
over existing methods (50). This was achieved by: (i)
the use of biotinylated secondary antibodies in conjunction with streptavidin-conjugated
horseradish peroxidase, combined with enhanced chemiluminescence detection of
LC20 species, (ii) fixing the LC20 on the PVDF membrane by treatment
with glutaraldehyde, and (iii) incorporating CanGetSignal® (Toyobo, Japan) into
the protocol. Utilization of a minimum number of steps in the protocol with the least
possible number of sample transfers maximized LC20 yield. The limit of detection
of LC20 was thereby increased from ∼200 fmol (4 ng) to ∼0.05 fmol (1 pg); we
estimate that a single afferent arteriole contains ∼2.5 fmol (50 pg) of LC20.Using this approach, we succeeded in quantifying LC20 phosphorylation levels in
single isolated afferent arterioles and observed that Ang II induced exclusively
monophosphorylation of LC20 whereas ET-1 induced diphosphorylation, both in a
time- and concentration-dependent manner (22).
ET-1-induced diphosphorylation was confirmed to occur at Thr18 and Ser19 using
phosphorylation site-specific antibodies. ET-1-induced LC20 diphosphorylation was
confirmed by the proximity ligation assay (51).
Furthermore, afferent arteriolar vasodilation (relaxation) occurred more slowly following
washout of ET-1 than Ang II (22). These findings are,
therefore, consistent with the hypothesis that pathophysiological signals such as ET-1 that
are associated with prolonged vasoconstrictor responses involve LC20
diphosphorylation, whereas physiological signals such as Ang II induce LC20
phosphorylation exclusively at Ser19. The additional phosphorylation at Thr18 induced by
ET-1 is, therefore, proposed to account, at least in part, for the sustained contractile
response of the afferent arteriole to ET-1 compared to Ang II.
Conclusions
LC20 is phosphorylated at Thr18 and Ser19 in a Ca2+-independent
manner by ILK and/or ZIPK, which are associated with the contractile machinery in vascular
smooth muscle. This occurs in concert with inhibition of MLCP by ROK-catalysed
phosphorylation of MYPT1, the regulatory and targeting subunit of the phosphatase.
Diphosphorylation of LC20 occurs in response to ET-1 (pathological stimulus) but
not Ang II (physiological stimulus) in renal afferent arterioles, and diphosphorylation of
LC20 is associated with decreased rates of LC20 dephosphorylation
and relaxation. ILK and ZIPK are, therefore, potential therapeutic targets for the treatment
of diseases associated with hypercontractility, such as hypertension, cerebral vasospasm
following subarachnoid hemorrhage, coronary arterial vasospasm, intimal hyperplasia, acute
renal insufficiency and chronic kidney disease.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Authors: Trinath P Das; Suman Suman; A M Sashi Papu John; Deeksha Pal; Angelena Edwards; Houda Alatassi; Murali K Ankem; Chendil Damodaran Journal: Cancer Lett Date: 2016-04-25 Impact factor: 8.679
Authors: Rhian M Touyz; Rheure Alves-Lopes; Francisco J Rios; Livia L Camargo; Aikaterini Anagnostopoulou; Anders Arner; Augusto C Montezano Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2018-03-15 Impact factor: 10.787