Literature DB >> 24770406

A five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reduction.

Malou Hultcrantz1, Aviya Lanis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of the non-skin thinning technique as compared with the thinning technique 5 years after surgical implantation of bone-anchored hearing "devices." STUDY
DESIGN: A single-center, 5-year retrospective follow-up study was designed to evaluate the novel surgical technique without skin thinning as compared to conventional techniques. Eligible patients were consecutively operated on 5 years earlier in a test group without thinning and in two control groups with thinning. In the first control group, a flap technique was used, whereas in the second control group a dermatome technique was used and age-matched patients were selected.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients were operated on with a single-step surgery under local anesthesia. In the test group (non-skin thinning technique), 12 patients were operated on with a linear incision using an 8.5-mm abutment. In the control groups (flap and dermatome techniques, 12 patients in each group), the standard protocol with skin thinning was used with a 5.5-mm abutment.
RESULTS: Throughout the 5-year span under review, the non-skin thinning test group exhibited good preservation of tissue with decreased skin reactions and no adverse events. The time required for surgery without skin thinning was reduced to approximately 10 to 15 minutes and the cosmetic outcome after 5 years was improved. Numbness and peri-implant infections were minimal in the surrounding skin area for patients who underwent surgery without thinning.
CONCLUSION: This 5-year follow-up study demonstrates that percutaneous osseointegrated implantation without skin thinning is safe and has a better outcome than implantation with skin thinning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24770406     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  11 in total

1.  Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques.

Authors:  Martin Reznitsky; Kirsten Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.

Authors:  E H H van der Stee; R M Strijbos; S J H Bom; M K S Hol
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  The Minimally Invasive Star-Shaped Incision Technique and the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Preservation for Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Samer Salameh; Aren Bezdjian; Sam J Daniel; Hans Gxm Thomeer
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21

Review 4.  New developments in bone-conduction hearing implants: a review.

Authors:  Sabine Reinfeldt; Bo Håkansson; Hamidreza Taghavi; Måns Eeg-Olofsson
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-01-16

5.  Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique.

Authors:  Ivo J Kruyt; Herman Kok; Arjan Bosman; Rik Chrétien Nelissen; Emmanuel Antonia Maria Mylanus; Myrthe Karianne Sofie Hol
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Long-Term Outcomes of the Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery vs. Linear Incision Technique With Soft Tissue Preservation for Installation of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Tim G A Calon; Martin L Johansson; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Herbert van den Berge; Mariette Wagenaar; Edwin Eichhorn; Miranda Janssen; Sofia Jonhede; Joost van Tongeren; Marcus Holmberg; Robert Stokroos
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Ex vivo Evaluation of a New Drill System for Placement of Percutaneous Bone Conduction Devices.

Authors:  Ruben M Strijbos; Louise V Straatman; Robert J Stokroos; Martin L Johansson
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-21

8.  Laser-Modified Surface Enhances Osseointegration and Biomechanical Anchorage of Commercially Pure Titanium Implants for Bone-Anchored Hearing Systems.

Authors:  Furqan A Shah; Martin L Johansson; Omar Omar; Hanna Simonsson; Anders Palmquist; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clinical Outcome of a Wide-diameter Bone-anchored Hearing Implant and a Surgical Technique With Tissue Preservation.

Authors:  Marius S Mowinckel; Martin N Møller; Kirsten N Wielandt; Søren Foghsgaard
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tim G A Calon; Marc van Hoof; Herbert van den Berge; Arthur J G de Bruijn; Joost van Tongeren; Janny R Hof; Jan Wouter Brunings; Sofia Jonhede; Lucien J C Anteunis; Miranda Janssen; Manuela A Joore; Marcus Holmberg; Martin L Johansson; Robert J Stokroos
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.