Literature DB >> 24770369

Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women.

Gerd Gigerenzer1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2014        PMID： 24770369     DOI： 10.1136/bmj.g2636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Do invitations for cervical screening provide sufficient information to enable informed choice? A cross-sectional study of invitations for publicly funded cervical screening.

Authors:  Sie Karen Kolthoff; Mie Sara Hestbech; Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; John Brodersen
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Willingness to participate in mammography screening: a randomized controlled questionnaire study of responses to two patient information leaflets with different factual content.

Authors:  Elisabeth Gummersbach; Jürgen in der Schmitten; Achim Mortsiefer; Heinz-Harald Abholz; Karl Wegscheider; Michael Pentzek
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  The Modest Effects of Fact Boxes on Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Michael R Eber; Cass R Sunstein; James K Hammitt; Jennifer M Yeh
Journal:  J Risk Uncertain       Date:  2021-02-17

4.  On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism.

Authors:  Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  Rev Philos Psychol       Date:  2015

5.  The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Scarce information about breast cancer screening: An Italian websites analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Attena; Mariagrazia Cancellieri; Concetta Paola Pelullo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Repeated testing improves achievement in a blended learning approach for risk competence training of medical students: results of a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  C Spreckelsen; J Juenger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Breast cancer mortality and associated factors in São Paulo State, Brazil: an ecological analysis.

Authors:  Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz; Alessandra Cristina Guedes Pellini; Adeylson Guimarães Ribeiro; Marcello Vannucci Tedardi; Marina Jorge de Miranda; Michelle Mosna Touso; Oswaldo Santos Baquero; Patrícia Carlos Dos Santos; Francisco Chiaravalloti-Neto
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Doctor, what does my positive test mean? From Bayesian textbook tasks to personalized risk communication.

Authors:  Gorka Navarrete; Rut Correia; Miroslav Sirota; Marie Juanchich; David Huepe
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-17

10.  Can you un-ring the bell? A qualitative study of how affect influences cancer screening decisions.

Authors:  S Michelle Driedger; Gary Annable; Melissa Brouwers; Donna Turner; Ryan Maier
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 4.430
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.