Literature DB >> 24769921

Numerical study of purely viscous non-Newtonian flow in an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Victor L Marrero, John A Tichy, Onkar Sahni, Kenneth E Jansen.   

Abstract

It is well known that blood has non-Newtonian properties, but it is generally accepted that blood behaves as a Newtonian fluid at shear rates above 100 s-1. However, in transient conditions, there are times and locations where the shear rate is well below 100 s-1, and it is reasonable to infer that non-Newtonian effects could become important. In this study, purely viscous non-Newtonian (generalized Newtonian) properties of blood are incorporated into the simulation-based framework for cardiovascular surgery planning developed by Taylor et al. (1999, "Predictive Medicine: Computational Techniques in Therapeutic Decision Making," Comput. Aided Surg., 4, pp. 231-247; 1998, "Finite Element Modeling of Blood Flow in Arteries," Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 158, pp. 155-196). Equations describing blood flow are solved in a patient-based abdominal aortic aneurysm model under steady and physiological flow conditions. Direct numerical simulation (DNS) is used, and the complex flow is found to be constantly transitioning between laminar and turbulent in both the spatial and temporal sense. It is found for the case simulated that using the non-Newtonian viscosity modifies the solution in subtle ways that yield a mesh-independent solution with fewer degrees of freedom than the Newtonian counterpart. It appears that in regions of separated flow, the lower shear rate produces higher viscosity with the non-Newtonian model, which reduces the associated resolution needs. When considering the real case of pulsatile flow, high shear layers lead to greater unsteadiness in the Newtonian case relative to the non-Newtonian case. This, in turn, results in a tendency for the non-Newtonian model to need fewer computational resources even though it has to perform additional calculations for the viscosity. It is also shown that both viscosity models predict comparable wall shear stress distribution. This work suggests that the use of a non-Newtonian viscosity models may be attractive to solve cardiovascular flows since it can provide simulation results that are presumably physically more realistic with at least comparable computational effort for a given level of accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769921     DOI: 10.1115/1.4027488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  8 in total

1.  Are Non-Newtonian Effects Important in Hemodynamic Simulations of Patients With Autogenous Fistula?

Authors:  S M Javid Mahmoudzadeh Akherat; Kevin Cassel; Michael Boghosian; Promila Dhar; Mary Hammes
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  Accounting for residence-time in blood rheology models: do we really need non-Newtonian blood flow modelling in large arteries?

Authors:  Amirhossein Arzani
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Non-Newtonian Effects on Patient-Specific Modeling of Fontan Hemodynamics.

Authors:  Zhenglun Wei; Shelly Singh-Gryzbon; Phillip M Trusty; Connor Huddleston; Yingnan Zhang; Mark A Fogel; Alessandro Veneziani; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Refining a numerical model for device-induced thrombosis and investigating the effects of non-Newtonian blood models.

Authors:  Ling Yang; Nicolas Tobin; Keefe B Manning
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Evaluation of Computational Methodologies for Accurate Prediction of Wall Shear Stress and Turbulence Parameters in a Patient-Specific Aorta.

Authors:  Emily Louise Manchester; Selene Pirola; Mohammad Yousuf Salmasi; Declan P O'Regan; Thanos Athanasiou; Xiao Yun Xu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-24

Review 6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  Hemodynamics of cerebral bridging veins connecting the superior sagittal sinus based on numerical simulation.

Authors:  Youyu Zhu; Feng Wang; Xuefei Deng
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Indications for liver surgery in benign tumours.

Authors:  Margot Fodor; Florian Primavesi; Eva Braunwarth; Benno Cardini; Thomas Resch; Reto Bale; Daniel Putzer; Benjamin Henninger; Rupert Oberhuber; Manuel Maglione; Christian Margreiter; Stefan Schneeberger; Dietmar Öfner; Stefan Stättner
Journal:  Eur Surg       Date:  2018-05-22       Impact factor: 0.953

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.