Literature DB >> 24769789

Screening for prostate cancer: are digital rectal examinations being performed?

Daniel G Federman1, Patricia Pitkin, Vera Carbone, John Concato, Jeffrey D Kravetz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Prostate cancer is common and prostate cancer screening is controversial; this retrospective observational study was conducted to determine the prevalence of digital rectal examination (DRE) in those in whom a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test was performed.
METHODS: A manual review was performed of the electronic medical record for male veterans in the VA Connecticut Healthcare System without a history of known prostate cancer aged between 50 and 74 years who underwent PSA testing. MAIN OUTCOMES: Documentation of DRE (or refusal) within 12 months before or after the performance of a PSA test.
RESULTS: Less than half (47.6%) of patients underwent DRE. An additional 6.9% were offered DRE and refused. Although the provider gender was not associated with DRE, resident physicians were less likely to perform DRE than nonresidents; P = 0.01. Patients whose PSA was > 4.0 ng/mL were more likely to undergo DRE than those whose PSA was ≤ 4.0 ng/mL; P = 0.002. Those with body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m 2 were less likely to undergo DRE than those with BMI < 30 kg/m 2 ; P = 0.04.
CONCLUSIONS: Screening for prostate cancer remains controversial. We found a low rate of DRE among veterans in whom prostate cancer screening was entertained. Although the provider gender does not seem to influence DRE, resident physicians were less likely to perform DRE than other providers. Our finding that BMI > 40 kg/m 2 is associated with a lower rate of DRE than those with BMI < 30 kg/m 2 is consistent with screening for other cancers and should be explored further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769789     DOI: 10.3810/hp.2014.04.1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hosp Pract (1995)        ISSN: 2154-8331


  4 in total

1.  Is it possible to automatically assess pretreatment digital rectal examination documentation using natural language processing? A single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Selen Bozkurt; Kathleen M Kan; Michelle K Ferrari; Daniel L Rubin; Douglas W Blayney; Tina Hernandez-Boussard; James D Brooks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Knowledge of prostate cancer presentation, etiology, and screening practices among women: a mixed-methods systematic review.

Authors:  Ebenezer Wiafe; Kofi Boamah Mensah; Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah; Varsha Bangalee; Frasia Oosthuizen
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-06

3.  Evaluation of the frequency of incidental findings and their clinical significance in multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging examination.

Authors:  Emre Emekli; Elif Gündoğdu
Journal:  Pol J Radiol       Date:  2022-07-21

4.  New Paradigms for Patient-Centered Outcomes Research in Electronic Medical Records: An Example of Detecting Urinary Incontinence Following Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Suzanne Tamang; Douglas Blayney; Jim Brooks; Nigam Shah
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-05-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.