Literature DB >> 24769656

Posttreatment assessment of women at risk of developing high-grade cervical disease: proposal for new guidelines based on data from the Netherlands.

Margot H Uijterwaal1, Mariëlle Kocken, Johannes Berkhof, Ruud L M Bekkers, Réne H M Verheijen, Theo J M Helmerhorst, Chris J L M Meijer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Women treated for high-grade cervical disease (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or grade 3 [CIN2/3]) face a significant risk of developing post-treatment disease. Therefore, in most European countries, they are monitored by cytologic testing at 6, 12, and 24 months after treatment. Although testing for high-risk types of the human papillomavirus (hrHPV) in the follow-up seems to be a valuable supplementary method, its use is not yet fully explored.
METHODS: Besides reviewing the literature, we completed a long-term follow-up study describing the cumulative risk for CIN2/3 or cancer (CIN2+) of different hrHPV and cytology test results after treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: High-risk HPV testing improves the sensitivity to detect posttreatment CIN2/3 (relative sensitivity=1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.06-1.25), but the highest sensitivity (95%, 95% CI=91%-98%) is reached by performing cotesting (both cytology and hrHPV). The CIN2+ risk after a single negative cotesting result taken 6 months after treatments was similar to the risk after 3 consecutive negative cytologic test results (5-y CIN2+ risk being 3.0% [95% CI=1.5%-6.1%] and 2.9% [95% CI=1.2%-7.1%], respectively). Women who test negative for cotesting at both 6 and 24 months after treatment have a minimal risk of developing CIN3+ in the next 5 years (0.0%, 95% CI=0.0%-3.0%). RECOMMENDATIONS: We propose a new posttreatment surveillance protocol, consisting of combined testing with both cytology and hrHPV at 6 and 24 months after treatment. After 2 negative cotesting results, women should be retested after 5 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769656     DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis        ISSN: 1089-2591            Impact factor:   1.925


  3 in total

1.  Use of visual inspection with acetic acid, Pap smear, or high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women living with HIV/AIDS for posttreatment cervical cancer screening: same tests, different priorities.

Authors:  Elkanah Omenge Orang'o; Tao Liu; Astrid Christoffersen-Deb; Peter Itsura; John Oguda; Sierra Washington; David Chumba; Latha Pisharodi; Susan Cu-Uvin; Anne F Rositch
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2017-01-14       Impact factor: 4.177

2.  Long-term costs of introducing HPV-DNA post-treatment surveillance to national cervical cancer screening in Ireland.

Authors:  Maria Agapova; Andrea Duignan; Alan Smith; Ciaran O'Neill; Anirban Basu
Journal:  Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  HPV Vaccination in Women with Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Undergoing Excisional Treatment: Insights into Unsolved Questions.

Authors:  Carla Henere; Aureli Torné; Anna Llupià; Marta Aldea; Cristina Martí; Ariel Glickman; Adela Saco; Lorena Marimon; Carolina Manzotti; Natalia Rakislova; Jaume Ordi; Marta Del Pino
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.