| Literature DB >> 24769624 |
Masayuki Satoh1, Jun-ichi Ogawa2, Tomoko Tokita3, Noriko Nakaguchi4, Koji Nakao5, Hirotaka Kida1, Hidekazu Tomimoto6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical exercise has positive effects on cognitive function in elderly people. It is unknown, however, if combinations of non-pharmaceutical interventions can produce more benefits than single ones. This study aimed to identify if physical exercise combined with music improves cognitive function in normal elderly people more than exercise alone.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24769624 PMCID: PMC4000225 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095230
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow Diagram of ExM and Ex group.
Figure 2Flow Diagram of Cont group.
Contents of the exercise.
| stage | title | duration (min.) | content |
| 1 | warming up | 3 | preparation |
| 2 | rhythmic walking | 10 | aerobic movement by marching |
| 3 | rhythmic exercise | 5 | clapping in various rhythms |
| 4 | muscle training | 8 | training of lumbar, limbs, and truncal muscles |
| 5 | stretch | 5 | stretching joints |
| 6 | respiration and voice | 10 | training of respiratory, facial, and speech muscles |
| 7 | rhythmic step | 5 | dancing |
| 8 | singing | 10 | singing familiar songs |
| 9 | cool down | 2 | relaxation |
min.: minutes
Characteristics of the ExM, Ex, and control groups.
| number (F:M) | age (±sd) | edu (±sd) | ADL (±sd) | MMSE (±sd) | |
| ExM | 26 (24∶2) | 72.4 (3.7) | 10.3 (1.6) | 2.6 (0.9) | 27.7 (2.3) |
| Ex | 28 (24∶4) | 72.8 (4.6) | 10.8 (1.8) | 2.6 (1.0) | 27.9 (1.8) |
| Cont | 35 (28∶7) | 73.5 (5.5) | 10.0 (2.1) | 2.7 (1.1) | 27.1 (2.6) |
| | |||||
| Kruskal-Wallis analysis ( | 0.75 | 0.68 | 0.88 | 0.41 | |
ADL: activity of daily life, edu: education,
Ex: physical exercise without music, ExM: physical exercise with music.
F: female, M: male, MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination.
sd: standard deviation.
Results from the analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the extent of changes before and after intervention in the three groups.
| test | difference before and after the intervention (mean(±sd)) |
| ||||
| ExM | Ex | Cont | ||||
|
|
| 1.0 (2.3) | −0.21 (2.1) | 0.14 (2.6) | 0.18 | |
|
| score | 0.6 (3.8) | −0.65 (3.1) | 0.23 (3.5) | 0.28 | |
| time | −44 (84) | −58 (94) | −19 (87) | 0.16 | ||
|
|
| 0.86 (3.3) | 0.62 (3.7) | 0.13 (4.1) | 0.79 | |
|
| 1.4 (3.4) | 1.1 (3.4) | 1.4 (3.4) | 0.96 | ||
|
|
| 1.7 (1.8) | 0.57 (1.5) | 0.26 (1.5) |
| |
|
|
| animal | 1.1 (4.4) | 1.6 (4.5) | 0.94 (5.6) | 0.54 |
| letters | 0.6 (4.0) | 0.0 (5.5) | 0.0 (3.0) | 0.63 | ||
|
| -A | 3.2 (29.9) | 9.0 (34) | −8.1 (49) | 0.54 | |
| -B | 0.3 (46.1) | 12 (69) | −37 (99) | 0.086 | ||
|
|
| 0.11 (0.18) | 0.11 (0.27) | 0.02 (0.28) | 0.28 | |
: 1 way ANOVA,
: Kruskal-Wallis test, Cont: control group, Ex: exercise group, ExM: exercise with music group; LM: logical memory, MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination, RCPM: Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, sd: standard deviation, TMT: Trail-Making Test, VSRAD: Voxel-based Specific Regional analysis system for Alzheimer's Disease; WF: word fluency; bold letters: significant.
Results of intra-group analyses before and after the intervention.
| tests | ExM | Ex | Cont | ||||||
| before | after | before | after | before | after | ||||
|
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 27.7 (2.3) | 28.7 (1.8) | 27.9 (1.8) | 27.8 (2.1) | 27.1 (2.6) | 27.2 (2.2) | |
|
|
| 0.54 | 0.78 | ||||||
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 26.4 (5.6) | 27.4 (5.2) | 27.4 (3.3) | 26.4 (4.1) | 26.2 (4.6) | 26.4 (3.8) | ||
|
| 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.70 | ||||||
| time (seconds, mean (sd)) | 335 (98) | 287 (62) | 355 (115) | 296 (91) | 330 (134) | 311 (104) | |||
|
|
|
| 0.26 | ||||||
|
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 11.3 (3.7) | 12.1 (3.2) | 11.6 (4.7) | 12.1 (3.8) | 10.5 (4.0) | 10.6 (4.2) | |
|
| 0.25 | 0.39 | 0.94 | ||||||
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 9.8 (4.4) | 11.2 (3.6) | 10.1 (4.1) | 11.2 (4.2) | 8.5 (3.9) | 9.8 (4.6) | ||
|
| 0.075 | 0.10 |
| ||||||
|
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 12.6 (1.6) | 14.3 (1.3) | 13.5 (1.3) | 14.1 (1.2) | 13.9 (1.3) | 14.1 (1.2) | |
|
|
| 0.062 | 0.34 | ||||||
|
|
| category | score (mean (sd)) | 14.7 (3.8) | 15.7 (4.3) | 12.9 (5.0) | 14.7 (5.5) | 12.4 (4.4) | 13.4 (5.0) |
|
| 0.16 |
| 0.39 | ||||||
| letters | score (mean (sd)) | 8.9 (3.0) | 9.5 (3.3) | 9.5 (2.8) | 10.2 (5.3) | 9.8 (4.6) | 9.8 (3.7) | ||
|
| 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.93 | ||||||
|
| -A | time (seconds, mean (sd)) | 127 (44) | 130 (41) | 137 (36) | 145 (50) | 140 (60) | 133 (45) | |
|
| 0.48 | 0.31 | 0.64 | ||||||
| -B | time (seconds, mean (sd)) | 169 (61) | 169 (45) | 186 (77) | 198 (85) | 211 (123) | 174 (63) | ||
|
| 0.81 | 0.41 |
| ||||||
|
|
| score (mean (sd)) | 0.84 (0.49) | 0.95 (0.54) | 0.91 (0.50) | 1.02 (0.59) | 1.32 (0.80) | 1.34 (0.96) | |
|
|
|
| 0.87 | ||||||
Cont: control group, Ex: exercise group, ExM: exercise with music group, LM: logical memory, MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination, RCPM: Raven's Coloured Progressive Matrices, sd: standard deviation, TMT: Trail-Making Test, VSRAD: Voxel-based Specific Regional analysis system for Alzheimer's Disease, WF: word fluency, bold letters: significant.