Jamie A O'Rourke1, Yung-Tsi Bolon2, Bruna Bucciarelli1, Carroll P Vance3. 1. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. 2. Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA. 3. United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA Department of Agronomy and Plant Genetics, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA vance004@umn.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The legume family (Leguminosae) consists of approx. 17 000 species. A few of these species, including, but not limited to, Phaseolus vulgaris, Cicer arietinum and Cajanus cajan, are important dietary components, providing protein for approx. 300 million people worldwide. Additional species, including soybean (Glycine max) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa), are important crops utilized mainly in animal feed. In addition, legumes are important contributors to biological nitrogen, forming symbiotic relationships with rhizobia to fix atmospheric N2 and providing up to 30 % of available nitrogen for the next season of crops. The application of high-throughput genomic technologies including genome sequencing projects, genome re-sequencing (DNA-seq) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) by the legume research community has provided major insights into genome evolution, genomic architecture and domestication. SCOPE AND CONCLUSIONS: This review presents an overview of the current state of legume genomics and explores the role that next-generation sequencing technologies play in advancing legume genomics. The adoption of next-generation sequencing and implementation of associated bioinformatic tools has allowed researchers to turn each species of interest into their own model organism. To illustrate the power of next-generation sequencing, an in-depth overview of the transcriptomes of both soybean and white lupin (Lupinus albus) is provided. The soybean transcriptome focuses on analysing seed development in two near-isogenic lines, examining the role of transporters, oil biosynthesis and nitrogen utilization. The white lupin transcriptome analysis examines how phosphate deficiency alters gene expression patterns, inducing the formation of cluster roots. Such studies illustrate the power of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analyses in elucidating the gene networks underlying biological processes.
BACKGROUND: The legume family (Leguminosae) consists of approx. 17 000 species. A few of these species, including, but not limited to, Phaseolus vulgaris, Cicer arietinum and Cajanus cajan, are important dietary components, providing protein for approx. 300 million people worldwide. Additional species, including soybean (Glycine max) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa), are important crops utilized mainly in animal feed. In addition, legumes are important contributors to biological nitrogen, forming symbiotic relationships with rhizobia to fix atmospheric N2 and providing up to 30 % of available nitrogen for the next season of crops. The application of high-throughput genomic technologies including genome sequencing projects, genome re-sequencing (DNA-seq) and transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) by the legume research community has provided major insights into genome evolution, genomic architecture and domestication. SCOPE AND CONCLUSIONS: This review presents an overview of the current state of legume genomics and explores the role that next-generation sequencing technologies play in advancing legume genomics. The adoption of next-generation sequencing and implementation of associated bioinformatic tools has allowed researchers to turn each species of interest into their own model organism. To illustrate the power of next-generation sequencing, an in-depth overview of the transcriptomes of both soybean and white lupin (Lupinus albus) is provided. The soybean transcriptome focuses on analysing seed development in two near-isogenic lines, examining the role of transporters, oil biosynthesis and nitrogen utilization. The white lupin transcriptome analysis examines how phosphatedeficiency alters gene expression patterns, inducing the formation of cluster roots. Such studies illustrate the power of next-generation sequencing and bioinformatic analyses in elucidating the gene networks underlying biological processes.
Authors: Maria Fedorova; Judith van de Mortel; Peter A Matsumoto; Jennifer Cho; Christopher D Town; Kathryn A VandenBosch; J Stephen Gantt; Carroll P Vance Journal: Plant Physiol Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 8.340
Authors: Oliver Thimm; Oliver Bläsing; Yves Gibon; Axel Nagel; Svenja Meyer; Peter Krüger; Joachim Selbig; Lukas A Müller; Seung Y Rhee; Mark Stitt Journal: Plant J Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 6.417
Authors: Ignaty Leshchiner; Kristen Alexa; Peter Kelsey; Ivan Adzhubei; Christina A Austin-Tse; Jeffrey D Cooney; Heidi Anderson; Matthew J King; Rolf W Stottmann; Maija K Garnaas; Seungshin Ha; Iain A Drummond; Barry H Paw; Trista E North; David R Beier; Wolfram Goessling; Shamil R Sunyaev Journal: Genome Res Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 9.043
Authors: Susanna Atwell; Yu S Huang; Bjarni J Vilhjálmsson; Glenda Willems; Matthew Horton; Yan Li; Dazhe Meng; Alexander Platt; Aaron M Tarone; Tina T Hu; Rong Jiang; N Wayan Muliyati; Xu Zhang; Muhammad Ali Amer; Ivan Baxter; Benjamin Brachi; Joanne Chory; Caroline Dean; Marilyne Debieu; Juliette de Meaux; Joseph R Ecker; Nathalie Faure; Joel M Kniskern; Jonathan D G Jones; Todd Michael; Adnane Nemri; Fabrice Roux; David E Salt; Chunlao Tang; Marco Todesco; M Brian Traw; Detlef Weigel; Paul Marjoram; Justin O Borevitz; Joy Bergelson; Magnus Nordborg Journal: Nature Date: 2010-03-24 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: S Samuel Yang; Zheng Jin Tu; Foo Cheung; Wayne Wenzhong Xu; JoAnn F S Lamb; Hans-Joachim G Jung; Carroll P Vance; John W Gronwald Journal: BMC Genomics Date: 2011-04-19 Impact factor: 3.969
Authors: Laurent Gentzbittel; Stig U Andersen; Cécile Ben; Martina Rickauer; Jens Stougaard; Nevin D Young Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2015-04-21 Impact factor: 5.753
Authors: Sudhansu Dash; Jacqueline D Campbell; Ethalinda K S Cannon; Alan M Cleary; Wei Huang; Scott R Kalberer; Vijay Karingula; Alex G Rice; Jugpreet Singh; Pooja E Umale; Nathan T Weeks; Andrew P Wilkey; Andrew D Farmer; Steven B Cannon Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-11-05 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Juhi Chaudhary; Gunvant B Patil; Humira Sonah; Rupesh K Deshmukh; Tri D Vuong; Babu Valliyodan; Henry T Nguyen Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 5.753