| Literature DB >> 24769530 |
Hiromasa Tanaka1, Kazuya Arashiba2, Shogo Kuriyama3, Akira Sasada4, Kazunari Nakajima3, Kazunari Yoshizawa4, Yoshiaki Nishibayashi3.
Abstract
It is vital to design effectiveEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24769530 PMCID: PMC4015321 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms4737
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Preparation and reactivity of molybdenum–nitride complexes.
(a) Preparation and reactivity of 2–5. (b) An ORTEP drawing of the cationic part of 4. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity. (c) An ORTEP drawing of the cationic part of 5. Thermal ellipsoids are shown at the 50% probability level. Hydrogen atoms except for H49 are omitted for clarity.
Catalytic formation of ammonia by molybdenum complexes.*
Figure 2A possible reaction pathway by 1.
(a) Protonation of a terminal dinitrogen ligand in 1 followed by exchange of the dinitrogen ligand trans to the NNH group for OTf group. Protons and electrons are supplied by lutidinium and cobaltocene, respectively. Energy changes and activation energies (in parenthesis) for individual reaction steps were calculated at the B3LYP*/BS2 level of theory (units in kcal mol−1). NB represents that the corresponding reaction has no activation barrier. (b) A sequential protonation/reduction of IV and separation of bimetallic complexes leading to formation of ammonia and the monometallic nitride complex XI. (c) A sequential protonation/reduction of XI via the six-coordinate imide complex XIII to give the ammonia complex XV. (d) Ligand exchange of ammonia for molecular dinitrogen leading to regeneration of 1.
Figure 3The first protonation step of 1.
(a) Energy profiles for proton transfer from LutH+ to a terminal dinitrogen ligand (TE, black), the bridging dinitrogen ligand (BR, red) and the pyridine nitrogen atom in the pincer ligand (PY, blue) in 1. Relative energies are given in kcal mol−1. (b) A space-filling model of 1.
Figure 4An unacceptable reaction pathway by 1.
(a) An unacceptable reaction pathway on the protonation of the dinitrogen ligands in the mononuclear molybdenum–dinitrogen complexes VIII and XIX, generated from 1, (Path C) and an unsuitable reaction pathway via mononuclear complexes involving XX as key reactive intermediates (Path D). Energy changes and activation energies (in parenthesis) for individual reaction steps were calculated at the B3LYP*/BS2 level of theory (units in kcal mol−1). (b) Spatial distribution of the HOMO of 1. Hydrogen atoms are omitted for clarity.
Bond dissociation energies.
Differences in the NPA atomic charge (Δq).