Literature DB >> 24769407

Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening for Internal Snapping of the Hip: Clinical Outcomes With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

Youssef F El Bitar1, Christine E Stake1, Kevin F Dunne1, Itamar B Botser1, Benjamin G Domb2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internal snapping of the hip is caused by the iliopsoas (IP) tendon sliding over the iliopectineal eminence or the femoral head. In many cases that require hip arthroscopic surgery, there is coexistent painful internal snapping. In such cases, fractional lengthening of the IP tendon has been suggested as an adjunctive procedure.
PURPOSE: To examine the outcomes and effectiveness of arthroscopic IP tendon fractional lengthening as a solution to coexistent internal hip snapping in patients undergoing hip arthroscopic surgery for a labral tear and/or femoroacetabular impingement. STUDY
DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: Between June 2010 and June 2011, data were prospectively collected for all patients with internal snapping of the hip who underwent primary arthroscopic IP tendon fractional lengthening, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. All patients were interviewed by telephone with specific questions regarding the resolution or persistence of snapping. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively using the following patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activity of Daily Living (HOS-ADL) and Sport-Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). Pain was recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS), and satisfaction was measured on a scale from 0 to 10.
RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included, with all PROs showing statistically significant improvement postoperatively (NAHS: 57.6 ± 20.6 preoperatively vs. 80.2 ± 19.2 at 2 years; HOS-ADL: 60.9 ± 21.4 preoperatively vs. 81.8 ± 20.6 at 2 years; HOS-SSS: 43.4 ± 24.6 preoperatively vs. 70.0 ± 26.7 at 2 years; and mHHS: 62.3 ± 16.4 preoperatively vs. 80.5 ± 18.3 at 2 years) (P < .001 for all). Forty-five patients (81.8%) reported good/excellent satisfaction (≥7). Overall, 45 patients (81.8%) reported resolution of painful snapping. Patients who had resolution of snapping had statistically significant superior outcomes compared with those with persistent snapping using the change in the NAHS value (25.8 ± 16.1 vs. 8.0 ± 22.5, respectively; P = .005), change in the HOS-ADL value (23.6 ± 18.0 vs. 8.5 ± 15.2, respectively; P = .017), change in the HOS-SSS value (30.7 ± 26.9 vs. 8.7 ± 23.6, respectively; P = .021), and change in the mHHS value (23.3 ± 20.1 vs. 4.4 ± 9.9, respectively; P = .005).
CONCLUSION: A majority of patients reported resolution of painful snapping and improvement in symptoms. Nonetheless, the rate of persistence of internal snapping at a minimum 2 years postoperatively was higher than that reported in previous studies.
© 2014 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  FAI; hip arthroscopic surgery; iliopsoas; impingement; internal hip snapping; labral tear; labrum

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769407     DOI: 10.1177/0363546514531037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  12 in total

1.  Arthroscopic Psoas Management: Techniques for Psoas Preservation and Psoas Tenotomy.

Authors:  Andrea M Spiker; Ryan M Degen; Christopher L Camp; Struan H Coleman
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-12-26

2.  Rehabilitation of soft tissue injuries of the hip and pelvis.

Authors:  Timothy F Tyler; Takumi Fukunaga; Joshua Gellert
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2014-11

3.  Endoscopic release of internal snapping hip: a review of literature.

Authors:  Alessio Giai Via; Attilio Basile; Mauricio Wainer; Carlos Musa; Johnny Padulo; Rodrigo Mardones
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2016-12-21

Review 4.  Snapping Hip Syndrome: A Comprehensive Update.

Authors:  Paul Walker; Emily Ellis; John Scofield; Thaksin Kongchum; William F Sherman; Alan D Kaye
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2021-06-22

Review 5.  Understanding and Treating the Snapping Hip.

Authors:  Yi-Meng Yen; Cara L Lewis; Young-Jo Kim
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.985

6.  Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening.

Authors:  David R Maldonado; Ajay C Lall; Muriel R Battaglia; Joseph R Laseter; Jeffrey W Chen; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2018-11-28

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearance of the Hip Musculature After Arthroscopic Labral-Level Iliopsoas Tenotomies.

Authors:  Brian E Walczak; Donna G Blankenbaker; Michael R Tuite; James S Keene
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-05-25

8.  Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic surgery for external snapping hip.

Authors:  Amrit Shrestha; Peng Wu; Heng'an Ge; Biao Cheng
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The Femoral Head "Divot" Sign: A Useful Arthroscopic Sign of Hip Microinstability.

Authors:  Philip J Rosinsky; Ben C Mayo; Cynthia Kyin; Jacob Shapira; David R Maldonado; Mitchell B Meghpara; Ajay C Lall; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2020-05-07

10.  Primary Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Labral Reconstruction: Is There a Difference Between an Autograft and Allograft?

Authors:  David R Maldonado; Ajay C Lall; Joseph R Laseter; Cynthia Kyin; Jeffrey W Chen; Cammille C Go; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-03-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.