Literature DB >> 24769148

Microbial assessment of an upward and downward dehiding technique in a commercial beef processing plant.

Thomas G Kennedy1, Efstathios S Giotis2, Aideen I McKevitt3.   

Abstract

Preventing microbial contamination during dehiding is challenging, and skinning methods are of critical importance for the hygienic status of beef carcasses. Two skinning methods are usually employed: upward hide pulling (UHP) and downward hide pulling (DHP). This study has compared the microbiological contamination of carcasses using both systems in a beef processing plant in the process of changing its dehiding method from UHP to DHP. 100 cm(2) areas from eight carcass sites (ham, chuck, rump, bung, flank, brisket, shin and neck) were sampled on 36 skinned carcasses dehided by each technique. Total viable counts (TVCs) and Enterobacteriaceae counts for each site were determined. No significant differences were observed in total (pooled-samples) carcass contamination regardless of the method used. However, significant differences (p<0.05) in TVCs were observed at the flank, shin, brisket and neck. These differences can be attributed to possible deficiencies in the implementation of the HACCP pre-requisite programmes, and are not necessarily associated with the skinning method per se.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beef carcass; Food safety; Microbial contamination; Upward and downward hide puller

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769148     DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.03.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Meat Sci        ISSN: 0309-1740            Impact factor:   5.209


  1 in total

1.  A Comparison of 16S rRNA Profiles Through Slaughter in Australian Export Beef Abattoirs.

Authors:  Sanga Kang; Joshua Ravensdale; Ranil Coorey; Gary A Dykes; Robert Barlow
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 5.640

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.