Literature DB >> 24769111

Potential lack of "standardized" processing techniques for production of allogeneic and xenogeneic bone blocks for application in humans.

S Ghanaati1, M Barbeck2, P Booms2, J Lorenz2, C J Kirkpatrick3, R A Sader4.   

Abstract

In the present study, the structure of two allogeneic and three xenogeneic bone blocks, which are used in dental and orthopedic surgery, were histologically analyzed. The ultimate goal was to assess whether the components postulated by the manufacturer can be identified after applying conventional histological and histochemical staining techniques. Three samples of each material, i.e. allogeneic material-1 and -2 as well as xenogeneic material-1, -2 and -3, were obtained commercially. After decalcification and standardized embedding processes, conventional histological staining was performed in order to detect inorganic matrix, cellular or organic matrix components. Allogeneic material-1 showed trabecular bone-like structures, which were free of cellular components as well as of organic matrix. The allogeneic material-2 showed trabecular bone structures, in which connective tissue and cellular remnants were embedded. Additionally, some connective tissue, which resembled fat-like tissue, was found within this material. The xenogeneic material-1 showed trabecular bone-like structures and contained organic components comparable to that demonstrated for the allogeneic material-2. The xenogeneic material-2 showed trabecular bone structures with single cells located in lacunae. The xenogeneic material-3 also showed trabecular structures. Neither cellular nor organic matrix components were found within this material. According to the data of the present study, the allogeneic material-1 and the xenogeneic material-3 were the only investigated materials for which the obtained histological data were in accordance with the manufactureŕs advertised information. The remaining three materials showed discrepancies-although the manufacturers of all five bone substitute materials stated that their blocks were free of organic/cellular remnants. These data are of great clinical and material science interest. It seems that even patented processing techniques are not always able to deliver reproducible materials. Although the manufacturers of all five bone blocks stated that their blocks were free of organic/cellular remnants, our histological analysis revealed that three out of five bone blocks did contain such remnants. Such specimens might be able to induce an immune response within the recipient.
Copyright © 2014 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allogeneic (DIZG Human Spongiosa, Puros Allograft Spongiosa®); Bone blocks; Bone tissue engineering; Xenogeneic (Tutobone®, OsteoBiol® Sp, Bio-Oss®)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769111     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  20 in total

1.  Development of a novel histological and histomorphometric evaluation protocol for a standardized description of the mid-palatal suture - An ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ines Willershausen; Christina Erbe; Sarah Al-Maawi; Anna Orlowska; Heiner Wehrbein; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 2.  Specialized Histological and Histomorphometrical Analytical Methods for Biocompatibility Testing of Biomaterials for Maxillofacial Surgery in (Pre-) Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Carolin Lindner; Annica PrÖhl; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck; Manuel Abels; Tom LÖffler; Milijana Batinic
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.155

3.  Allogeneic bone block for challenging augmentation-a clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical investigation of tissue reaction and new bone formation.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Alica Kubesch; Sarah Al-Maawi; Frank Schwarz; Robert A Sader; Markus Schlee; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical trial and in-vitro study comparing the efficacy of treating bony lesions with allografts versus synthetic or highly-processed xenogeneic bone grafts.

Authors:  Eva Johanna Kubosch; Anke Bernstein; Laura Wolf; Tobias Fretwurst; Katja Nelson; Hagen Schmal
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Variant Purification of an Allogeneic Bone Block.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Markus Schlee; Sarah Al-Maawi; Poju Chia; Robert A Sader; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2017-06

6.  Effects of BMP-2 Delivery in Calcium Phosphate Bone Graft Materials with Different Compositions on Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Jin-Chul Park; Eun-Bin Bae; Se-Eun Kim; So-Yun Kim; Kyung-Hee Choi; Jae-Won Choi; Ji-Hyeon Bae; Jae-Jun Ryu; Jung-Bo Huh
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Inclusion of a 3D-printed Hyperelastic Bone mesh improves mechanical and osteogenic performance of a mineralized collagen scaffold.

Authors:  Marley J Dewey; Andrey V Nosatov; Kiran Subedi; Ramille Shah; Adam Jakus; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 8.947

8.  In Vivo Analysis of the Biocompatibility and Bone Healing Capacity of a Novel Bone Grafting Material Combined with Hyaluronic Acid.

Authors:  Annica Pröhl; Milijana Batinic; Said Alkildani; Michael Hahn; Milena Radenkovic; Stevo Najman; Ole Jung; Mike Barbeck
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Facial Bone Reconstruction Using both Marine or Non-Marine Bone Substitutes: Evaluation of Current Outcomes in a Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Marco Cicciù; Gabriele Cervino; Alan Scott Herford; Fausto Famà; Ennio Bramanti; Luca Fiorillo; Floriana Lauritano; Sergio Sambataro; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Laino
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.118

10.  Hydrophilicity, Viscoelastic, and Physicochemical Properties Variations in Dental Bone Grafting Substitutes.

Authors:  Branko Trajkovski; Matthias Jaunich; Wolf-Dieter Müller; Florian Beuer; Gregory-George Zafiropoulos; Alireza Houshmand
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.623

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.