Literature DB >> 24769078

Web-based tracking methods in longitudinal studies.

Izaak L Williams1, Clifford R O'Donnell2.   

Abstract

The use of online resources to reduce the attrition of program participants in longitudinal studies is examined. Higher-risk individuals, those involved in illegal activities, and females with last name changes are typically more difficult to locate. The effectiveness of using online resources for these participants is addressed. These resources include social networking sites, people-finder search engines, telephone and address directories, judicial records, and death records. The strengths and limitations of these resources are presented and discussed. Longitudinal studies using these resources are examined to evaluate their successful follow-up rates. The results of these studies indicate that participant characteristics are more important to successful follow-up than the length of time since participation or sample size. The use of multiple online sites increased follow-up rates, especially for those who are typically difficult to locate. The variables and websites to consider are discussed, and six lessons learned are offered. The prospective use of online participant involvement is especially important for successful longitudinal evaluation and program planning.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Follow-up; Longitudinal; Online resources; Program planning; Tracking

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24769078     DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2014.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eval Program Plann        ISSN: 0149-7189


  5 in total

1.  Thirty years later: Locating and interviewing participants of the Chicago Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Suh-Ruu Ou; Christina F Mondi; Sangok Yoo; Kyungin Park; Brianne Warren; Arthur J Reynolds
Journal:  Early Child Res Q       Date:  2019-09-26

2.  A randomised controlled trial comparing opt-in and opt-out home visits for tracing lost participants in a prospective birth cohort study.

Authors:  Isabelle Bray; Sian Noble; Andy Boyd; Lindsey Brown; Pei Hayes; Joanne Malcolm; Ross Robinson; Rachel Williams; Kirsty Burston; John Macleod; Lynn Molloy; Kate Tilling
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Understanding Attrition and Bolstering Retention in a Longitudinal Panel of Older Adults: ORANJ BOWL.

Authors:  Allison R Heid; Francine P Cartwright; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Rachel Pruchno
Journal:  Innov Aging       Date:  2021-03-23

4.  Retaining a Sample of Homeless Youth.

Authors:  Cheryl Forchuk; Tony O'Regan; Mo Jeng; Amanda Wright
Journal:  J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-07-01

5.  Technological aids for improving longitudinal research on substance use disorders.

Authors:  David Farabee; Marya Schulte; Rachel Gonzales; Christine E Grella
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.