Literature DB >> 24768934

Advancing the 3Rs in regulatory toxicology - Carcinogenicity testing: Scope for harmonisation and advancing the 3Rs in regulated sectors of the European Union.

Erwin Annys1, Richard Billington2, Rick Clayton3, Klaus-Dieter Bremm4, Michael Graziano5, Jo McKelvie6, Ian Ragan7, Michael Schwarz8, Jan Willem van der Laan9, Charles Wood10, Mattias Öberg11, Piet Wester12, Kevin N Woodward13.   

Abstract

Different government agencies operating in the European Union regulate different types of chemical products but all require testing for carcinogenicity to support applications for product marketing and commercialisation. A conference was held in Brussels in 2013 where representatives of the pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection industries, together with representatives of regulatory agencies, universities and other stakeholders, met under the auspices of The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) to discuss the varying requirements for carcinogenicity testing, and how these studies might be refined to improve hazard evaluation and risk assessment while implementing principles of the 3Rs (replacement, refinement and reduction in animal studies). While there are some similarities, the regulatory approaches in pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection sectors have varying degrees of flexibility in requirements for carcinogenicity testing, to an extent reflecting concerns over the magnitude and duration of human exposure, either directly as in therapeutic exposure to pharmaceuticals, or indirectly through the ingestion of residues of veterinary drugs or plant protection chemicals. The article discusses these differences and other considerations for modified carcinogenicity testing paradigms on the basis of scientific and 3Rs approaches.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carcinogenicity; Chemicals; Genotoxicity; Pharmaceuticals; Plant protection; Reduction; Refinement; Replacement; Transgenic; Veterinary drugs

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768934     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.04.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  5 in total

1.  The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA): promoting alternative methods in Europe and beyond.

Authors:  Gwenole Cozigou; Jonathan Crozier; Coenraad Hendriksen; Irene Manou; Tzutzuy Ramirez-Hernandez; Renate Weissenhorn
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 2.  Prediction of the Carcinogenic Potential of Human Pharmaceuticals Using Repeated Dose Toxicity Data and Their Pharmacological Properties.

Authors:  Jan Willem van der Laan; Wenny H W Buitenhuis; Laura Wagenaar; Ans E M F Soffers; Eugene P van Someren; Cyrille A M Krul; Ruud A Woutersen
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2016-10-14

3.  Moving forward in carcinogenicity assessment: Report of an EURL ECVAM/ESTIV workshop.

Authors:  Raffaella Corvi; Federica Madia; Kathryn Z Guyton; Peter Kasper; Ruthann Rudel; Annamaria Colacci; Jos Kleinjans; Paul Jennings
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Strategic focus on 3R principles reveals major reductions in the use of animals in pharmaceutical toxicity testing.

Authors:  Elin Törnqvist; Anita Annas; Britta Granath; Elisabeth Jalkesten; Ian Cotgreave; Mattias Öberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The transformics assay: first steps for the development of an integrated approach to investigate the malignant cell transformation in vitro.

Authors:  Maria Grazia Mascolo; Stefania Perdichizzi; Monica Vaccari; Francesca Rotondo; Cristina Zanzi; Sandro Grilli; Martin Paparella; Miriam N Jacobs; Annamaria Colacci
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 4.944

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.