| Literature DB >> 24768934 |
Erwin Annys1, Richard Billington2, Rick Clayton3, Klaus-Dieter Bremm4, Michael Graziano5, Jo McKelvie6, Ian Ragan7, Michael Schwarz8, Jan Willem van der Laan9, Charles Wood10, Mattias Öberg11, Piet Wester12, Kevin N Woodward13.
Abstract
Different government agencies operating in the European Union regulate different types of chemical products but all require testing for carcinogenicity to support applications for product marketing and commercialisation. A conference was held in Brussels in 2013 where representatives of the pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection industries, together with representatives of regulatory agencies, universities and other stakeholders, met under the auspices of The European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (EPAA) to discuss the varying requirements for carcinogenicity testing, and how these studies might be refined to improve hazard evaluation and risk assessment while implementing principles of the 3Rs (replacement, refinement and reduction in animal studies). While there are some similarities, the regulatory approaches in pharmaceutical, animal health, chemical and plant protection sectors have varying degrees of flexibility in requirements for carcinogenicity testing, to an extent reflecting concerns over the magnitude and duration of human exposure, either directly as in therapeutic exposure to pharmaceuticals, or indirectly through the ingestion of residues of veterinary drugs or plant protection chemicals. The article discusses these differences and other considerations for modified carcinogenicity testing paradigms on the basis of scientific and 3Rs approaches.Entities:
Keywords: Carcinogenicity; Chemicals; Genotoxicity; Pharmaceuticals; Plant protection; Reduction; Refinement; Replacement; Transgenic; Veterinary drugs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24768934 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.04.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ISSN: 0273-2300 Impact factor: 3.271