Literature DB >> 24768500

Revision hip arthroplasty using a modular revision hip system in cases of severe bone loss.

Ivan Dzaja1, Matt C Lyons2, Richard W McCalden1, Douglas D D Naudie1, James L Howard1.   

Abstract

We sought to identify outcomes of the Restoration Modular Hip System in cases of severe femoral bone stock deficiency. We performed a retrospective review of 55 revTHAs with a mean follow-up of 32 months (24-60 months). Outcomes included the WOMAC and HHS. Preoperative bone loss was categorized as Paprosky 3A (n = 13), 3B (n = 14), and 4 (n = 17). Periprosthetic fractures were classified as Vancouver B2 (n = 6) and B3 (n = 5). 53 of 55 stems were in situ at time of final review. WOMAC improved from 46 ± 18 to 70 ± 22 and HHS improved from 47 ± 15 to 78 ± 15. Complications were identified in 9 patients, which included dislocation (3), subsidence (2), infection (2), and periprosthetic fracture (2). In cases of significant proximal femoral bone deficiency, this stem demonstrated improvement in clinical outcomes with good results at short-term follow up.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  femoral bone loss; revision hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768500     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  New fracture pattern focusing on implant fracture for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Jie-Feng Huang; Jian-Jian Shen; Jun-Jie Chen; Yang Zheng; Wen-Xi Du; Fu-Cun Liu; Pei-Jian Tong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Use of the Corail stem for revision total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of clinical outcomes and cost

Authors:  Thomas J. Wood; Mohammad Alzahrani; `Jacquelyn D. Marsh; Lyndsay E. Somerville; Edward M. Vasarhelyi; Brent A. Lanting
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Mid- to long-term results of the Cone-Conical modular system in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Abd-Allah El Ashmawy; Hazem A H Hosny; Ahmed El-Bakoury; Rathan Yarlagadda; Jonathan Keenan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with modular stems.

Authors:  Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero; Jesus Fernandez-Lombardia; Jimena Llorens de los Rios; Ivan Perez-Coto; Susana Iglesias-Fernandez
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Implant-delivered Alendronate Causes a Dose-dependent Response on Net Bone Formation Around Porous Titanium Implants in Canines.

Authors:  Jenny Ann Pura; J Dennis Bobyn; Michael Tanzer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed for Coxarthrosis Preserves Long-Term Physical Function: A 40-Year Experience.

Authors:  Philip D Wilson; Leslee Wong; Yuo-Yu Lee; Stephen Lyman; Charles N Cornell
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2019-04-22

7.  Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.

Authors:  Gihan Jayasinghe; Chris Buckle; Lucy Clare Maling; Christopher To; Chukwudubem Anibueze; Parthiban Vinayakam; Richard Slack
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-04-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.