Literature DB >> 24768474

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating between benign and malignant vertebral lesions: role of diffusion-weighted imaging, in-phase/opposed-phase imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient.

J Martel Villagrán1, Á Bueno Horcajadas2, E Pérez Fernández2, S Martín Martín3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability of MRI to distinguish between benign and malignant vertebral lesions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 85 patients and studied a total of 213 vertebrae (both pathologic and normal). For each vertebra, we determined whether the lesion was hypointense in T1-weighted sequences and whether it was hyperintense in STIR and in diffusion-weighted sequences. We calculated the in-phase/out-of-phase quotient and the apparent diffusion coefficient for each vertebra. We combined parameters from T1-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and STIR sequences to devise a formula to distinguish benign from malignant lesions.
RESULTS: The group comprised 60 (70.6%) women and 25 (29.4%) men with a mean age of 67±13.5 years (range, 33-90 y). Of the 85 patients, 26 (30.6%) had a known primary tumor. When the lesion was hypointense on T1-weighted sequences, hyperintense on STIR and diffusion-weighted sequences, and had a signal intensity quotient greater than 0.8, the sensitivity was 97.2%, the specificity was 90%, and the diagnostic accuracy was 91.2%. If the patient had a known primary tumor, these values increased to 97.2%, 99.4%, and 99%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Benign lesions can be distinguished from malignant lesions if we combine the information from T1-weighted, STIR, and diffusion-weighted sequences together with the in-phase/out-of-phase quotient of the lesion detected in the vertebral body on MRI.
Copyright © 2013 SERAM. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apparent diffusion coefficient; Coeficiente de difusión aparente; Diffusion; Difusión; Fase/fuera de fase; Fracturas; Fractures; In phase/out of phase; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metastasis; Metástasis; Osteoporosis; Resonancia magnética; Vertebra; Vértebra

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24768474     DOI: 10.1016/j.rx.2013.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologia        ISSN: 0033-8338


  5 in total

1.  Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion tensor imaging in differentiating malignant from benign compressed vertebrae.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Fatma Mohamed Sherif
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis for differentiating solid ovarian tumors.

Authors:  Renwei Liu; Ruifeng Li; Jinzhi Fang; Kan Deng; Cuimei Chen; Jianhua Li; Zhiqing Wu; Xiaoxu Zeng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  ADC as a useful diagnostic tool for differentiating benign and malignant vertebral bone marrow lesions and compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chong Hyun Suh; Seong Jong Yun; Wook Jin; Sun Hwa Lee; So Young Park; Chang-Woo Ryu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Differential diagnosis of hemangiomas from spinal osteolytic metastases using 3.0 T MRI: comparison of T1-weighted imaging, chemical-shift imaging, diffusion-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging.

Authors:  Yan-Jie Shi; Xiao-Ting Li; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Yu-Liang Liu; Lei Tang; Ying-Shi Sun
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-24

Review 5.  Diagnostic Performance of Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Bone Malignancy: Evidence From a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Li-Peng Liu; Long-Biao Cui; Xin-Xin Zhang; Jing Cao; Ning Chang; Xing Tang; Shun Qi; Xiao-Liang Zhang; Hong Yin; Jian Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.